• lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s been a problem ever since the Industrial Revolution, which oligarchs supplanted the aristocracy while class conflict remained. There were attempts at changing the status quo, or overthrowing it and replacing with a different system, there’s so much discussion and debate, but actual success of the masses – if we must have inclusion of those oppressed regardless of race, creed or faith – has yet to be seen.

    One thing is for certain: this time peaceful and legal options are starting to be exhausted of their energy, as the moneyed enemy isn’t going to yield easily.

  • elbiter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Of course it is. And is also about oligarchs giving orders to the media they control to not call them by that name.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The US has been an Oligarchy for quite a while now.

    Amongst other things that’s why Bernie’s campaign to be the Democrat candidate was torpedoed directly by the DNC so that Hillary “I got a cool half a million to give a speech to Goldman Sach’s traders” Clinton got the nomination and then proceeded to lose to none other than old-money multi-millionaire Donald Trump.

    I mean, it’s pretty obvious even before Reagan that the Hierarchy Of Power in the US has in many things had Money as a higher power than Democratically Elected Administration - or in other words, the inverse of the order that it should be in Democracy - and that has expanded to pretty much all things since.

    The US (and several other so-called “Democratic” nations) hasn’t had Democracy for many years.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      No one is going to lend me money with a paltry $0.65 on my bank account and the prospect of a week of going to be bed on an empty stomach for dinner as collateral, though

  • Tempus Fugit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yes, now realize every establishment Democrat is also paid off by these demons too. Grassroots progressives or RIP the system, I have no other choice.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you’re playing a game by the rules your opponent not only writes, but also actively breaks, and cheats, you’re going to lose.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If one ship cost is one bilion dollars(Elon once bought a yacht for one bilion dollars) he could fund all ships for Achaemenid Empire for Battle of Salamis.

    • stinerman@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not trying to be that guy, but ActivityPub is technically owned by the W3C. I agree with the sentiment of your post regarding the free nature of AP.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The specification yes. But can they silence voices they don’t like, and amplify those they do? No? Then no problem.

        • stinerman@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          AP is just a protocol. Like HTTP. The IETF owns the HTTP protocol. Anyone is free to implement it, but they decide what HTTP is and how it evolves over time.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I don’t believe many people implementing AP listen to W3C. W3C can say they own it, but I want to see practical evidence, not just a flag.

            • stinerman@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              By that definition no one owns any open standard. Either way this was an academic argument to start with, so it’s not worth belaboring.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Seems like there are an awful lot of tankies here though

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sure but watch this

        Tankies suck! Stalin was a monster. China is an undemocratic oligarchy. Luigi Mangione should go shoot Kim Jong Un.

        See? That’s why the fediverse is better.

        • Owl@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yes that’s cool! But if we were in a community ruled by people who were to disagree with what you wrote you would be banned and censored the same. And some communities are too large and well in place for their userbase to be moved.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            20 hours ago

            If not tankies, then who rules this community? I’ll put it to the test. My guess is that they’ll only ban me if I say something truly horrible, not merely “people who disagree”.

            Enshittification is all about next quarter, not reliable income. Eventually it gets so shitty that the users move.

  • heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    And if people were to try to topple the oligarchy, Dems would toss them under the bus.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oracle probably doesn’t mean anything to the typical person so Bernie didn’t mention it, but Oracle owns a ton of shit which would have made ole Evil Larry an oligarch even before all these media company takeovers.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Name would be fitting. They’re a law firm pretending to be a software company.

  • danciestlobster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t think they are worth anywhere near that much, personally. Maybe in terms of dollars but certainly not to society…