In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    239
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Every once in awhile I catch myself thinking about how different the world would have been if Bernie was president and it’s just so fucking sad.

    I get that all the other problems would still exist, but there would be a glimmer of hope to cling on to.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      152
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I voted for Bernie and he would have been great, I always find myself thinking about Gore winning more often. I have more respect for Bernie for sure but we’d have been in such a better place by 2016. Jesus, there’s a non-zero chance that the 9/11 warnings don’t get ignored and the US definitely doesn’t invade Iraq or Afghanistan. The housing bubble would probably still have burst in a bad way but I doubt it goes down the same way. Supreme Court wouldn’t be as full of neocons and zealots.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not just that if Gore had won and 9-11 would have still happened we would have likely seen a push away from oil starting in the early 2000s. I think Gore could’ve turned that into an opportunity to say “to hell with these middle east authoritarians and their oil, we can do better for ourselves and better for the planet.”

        Unfortunately I was 6 when 9-11 happened so I didn’t have much say in these matters.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, this was always my big one too. I’m a green at heart, but I learned a brutal lesson then, that I’ll carry inside of me forever. A lesson that has only gotten reinforced by the slow march of modern fascism.

        Democracy requires dialogue, patience, empathy and compromise. The alternative is authoritarianism, and the unavoidable power struggles that come from too much centralized power in a world with ambitious humans. We need to remember that, and dialogue and compromise with our, in many ways younger-self progressives, instead of trying to corral them. We can do this. We are not too afraid.

        Give em hell Bernie.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I think with gore we’d’ve had a good chance of being the world leader in switching to green energy right around when hummers got popular instead.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s possible we’d be in a better situation now. Lots of obvious things like not tossing out known facts about terrorism efforts and having a climate change awareness leadership. There’s much that would still be the same, like the system of consumerism that is the core of much of our problems. One person in a limited power seat can’t fix that, I’m not sure anything can outside of failure of the system itself. But I do think we would have at least avoided that one historic turning point that revved back up the military drive of the US. Even GWB’s administration was looking into ways of reducing the military into smaller, more mobile parts until suddenly we went into revenge mode. Or useful crisis mode.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I always find myself thinking about Gore winning more often.

        We might be thinking about Biden winning his second term as Nazis take over the US in the future - Get your friends to vote

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I do wish he had been president, but I also wonder how much of his agenda he could have gotten past congress, even if Democrats were in charge. Most Democrats are, at best, about preserving the status quo and I hate having to vote for them just to stop the people who will make things even worse.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Undoubtedly they would’ve sabotaged Bernie every chance they got, just like the labour party sabotaged Corbyn in the UK. Both of those parties are glad they only had to sabotage during the elections.

    • Yewb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Remember when debbie Wasserman shutlz stole the dnc nomination from bernie to give it to Hillary?

      That one rug pull gave donnie the win.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          8 months ago

          With an election coming up, the Schrodingers Leftist dilemma is in full force, even on Lemmy -

          Where we’re simultaneously both powerful enough to be personally behind every Republican win of the past 20 years, and also so insignificant that we must be ridiculed and bullied at every turn to remind us that we have NO PLACE in their party they blame us for not backing.

          The best part is that most of the time people hit both sides of the coin in the same comment.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Centerists, or people who voted for Biden in the primaries tell progressives and leftists we’re minority viewpoints within the Democrat party. Implying that we have no business trying to influence the direction of the party. These same centerists also blame us when their garbage candidates don’t win in the general election and tell us things like “Biden was a good compromise” or “You got pretty much everything you wanted” despite neither of those things being true.

              Centerists got so comfortable winning elections on their own they forgot how to compromise and accuse anyone else trying to negotiate as “throwing a tantrum”.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is the most upsetting part, he fucking won, and we still have to live with the consequences of the GOP blatantly stealing the election

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It wasn’t just Bernie who got the screws from Democrats. Henry Wallace got the same shaft from Democrats. On the other hand, Republicans don’t have populist fliers, they have fascists fliers who are promoted to the top.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

    No, The Guardian, you missed the whole fucking point.

    The important thing Sanders said is that unless the president was more direct in recognizing the many crises faced by working-class families then our entire democracy would be destroyed.

    This is an existential threat, not a goddamned motherfucking horse race, and I am sick and tired of the media supporting fascism by treating it like the latter!

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Unless the Trump is held accountable, He will most likely win. People’s material needs are important and Dem messaging has basically been hey we showed this graph so you’re not struggling and anything popular you want won’t happen. But everything bad will happen with the other guy. Being not Trump once again is a dangerous way to win the election. Trump’s cultist ass should be getting crushed.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Trump’s cultist ass should be getting crushed.

      Makes me wonder what might have happened if the DNC hadn’t f**ked Bernie over, twice.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Very explicitly knowingly *

          *FTFY.

          Democrats will suspend the constitution THEMSELVES before they go against our corporate overlords and run someone like Bernie.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Unknowingly? They would rather have Trump than Bernie ruining their two party corruption. The DNC won in 2016.

      • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It hurts me to think how much better a position we would be in right now if they hadn’t worked so hard to marginalize him.

        Imagine how many lives would have been saved on just the pandemic disinformation alone.

        And Bernie would have absolutely demolished cheetolini in the debates.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe he would have lost his aura because he wouldn’t have had the means to do what he says should be done.

        • spider@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Maybe he would have lost his aura

          At this point Bernie’s lost at least some of it; I can’t disagree with those who’ve accused him of sheepdogging, although I think he was trying to do the best he could with what he had.

      • Rusticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well progressives are to blame for their incessant whining that any candidate that is not 100% progressive is absolute shit. Progressives are bitching about PEOPLE while corporatists are controlling the narrative about ISSUES.

        • spider@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Progressives are bitching about PEOPLE while corporatists are controlling the narrative about ISSUES.

          Progressives have been banging the drum for universal health care (an ISSUE) for years, so far with no luck – (no) thanks to the corporatists.

          And as for Israel (also an ISSUE), don’t get me started…

          • Rusticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            8 months ago

            The whole point is that progressives are getting CRUSHED by the corporatists because the whiners can’t stop eating their own.

            • spider@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              progressives are getting CRUSHED by the corporatists

              Well yeah, because the corporatists control the purse strings.

              • Rusticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                8 months ago

                Until progressives learn to play and win the messaging game, we’re wasting our time. But it has to start with positive messaging not negative messaging. Trumpists have that market cornered.

                • spider@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Again, messaging takes money, and that’s controlled by the corporate wing of the party.

                  Progressives are more or less wasting their time if they don’t leave the party.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s not a messaging issue. Boomers are intentionally voting against progressives and leftists in primaries because boomers are selfish pieces of shit who enjoy fucking over anybody younger than 65 years old.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              What on earth are you talking about? Progressives and leftists didn’t lose the 2020 primaries due to infighting. Having multiple candidates running with similar perspectives is a sign of a healthy movement. I wanted Bernie but I would’ve happily supported others.

              But Boomers couldn’t resist the chance to vote against progressive and leftist efforts and since Biden was the only viable procorporate trash candidate they rallied around him.

              Fuck the Boomers.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It still blows my mind he wasn’t taken into custody for sedition ON Jan 6th.

      I think future historians will point to that as a major turning point in our nation’s decline.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Taking a sitting president into custody without impeachment when he is not an immediate threat would be a coup, which I imagine would be worse for democracy, though maybe not for america.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pretty sure the final outcome of letting donny spray tan go with zero consequences is going to be him winning the last election our country ever has, so pardon me if I don’t agree with you that taking a sitting president into custody is more of a problem than a legit dictator being allowed to run for office.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            No point worrying about Trump desteoying democracy if you destroy it yourself first. Its not like you can’t stop an insurrectionist from running for office legally without violating the constitution and laws by taking him into custody.

            • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              In a less corrupt world I would say that peaceful protests are a legal way to keep him out of office but we all know cop hypocrisy and the right wing media machine will spin it just like they did for all the George Floyd protests.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          As someone active in politics since the late 80s, I can say we have certainly lost a number of our civil liberties, fascists feel emboldened enough to go full masks-off on the floor of Congress, and we just had a fucking soft coup attempt, so yea our trajectory has been on the downward side of parabolic since Ragass Reagan was allowed to ooze into the white house.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I really don’t want another run of Trump pardoning psychopaths and doing what he wants. But democracy is basically in the hands of Dems and they scrap by when it comes to connecting with people or even giving them a vision post beating Trump.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          The only way Trump is “connecting” with people is by telling them grandiose lies and making impossible promises.

          Annoyingly, a shitton of people are willing to go along with those lies without thinking about it or questioning anything.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If only the “good guys” would do what the voters they depend on to win are demanding instead of trying to court Republican votes.

      • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure he’s unpopular with progressives and the youth.

        Most blue voters are older people more interested in the status quo and in any other country with a sane Overton window would be called conservatives.

        And the idealism of youth can easily convince them that a 3rd party vote is a meaningful protest against the DNC’s lack of progressive action.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Biden won’t win without progressives and youth. Pandering to the center is how you lose. Trump won bc he did not play to the center.

          • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Just more evidence how monumentally short-sighted and ignorant a huge chunk of humanity is.

            Either Biden wins or we don’t have elections anymore and trumpty dumpty is really masks off about it now on international television,

            And if that happens, there’s gonna be a lot of ‘progressives and youth’ regretting their choices when donny spray-tan invokes martial law.

            I’m sure their idealism will keep them warm and safe when the purges start.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s kinda crazy since, what will the other wlsode do to help? There is a strong history of actively harming everyone but the ultra rich.

      It’s like being mad at my boss because he isn’t telling me how he’s going to help me on my career progression, and deciding I’ll switch bosses to a corrupt prison guard instead.

    • mockernicholas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately the way I see it is Biden will lose for two reasons:

      1. Hes old af
      2. Inflation

      Regardless of policies or how terrible the alternative is. I dont think most people are going to think much past “Things are expensive now, and oh great a super old white dude”.

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Love how they can blame inflation on Joe Brandon, but they refused to blame 45 for anything for 4 years.

        • mockernicholas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Different types of people. Its a shame Democrats have such an uphill battle to rally around candidates because those voters hold their leaders accountable, almost to a fault. The republican voter base is made of people who are basically in a cult, or are one issue voters.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Love how they can blame inflation on Joe Brandon, but they refused to blame 45 for anything for 4 years.

          Because the Dems were not yelling that from the rooftops like they should have been, so perception is set as that it’s Biden’s fault.

          • Rusticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Why is that the perception?

            Hint: Corps are at record high profits as is wealth inequality.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Just pointing out the facts. If you’re falling for some perception then you are the problem because not only are you not paying attention but you have no concept of history or facts.

            Unfortunately this country is filled to the brim with people that are clueless, can’t remember what happened yesterday, and are misled by media to believe whatever nonsense they are gaslighting today.

            So ultimately you are right but people need to be reminded that Trump was front and center of all of this inflation instead of blaming someone that came in after the damage was already done.

            With all of this said, why would anyone look at Biden and say “oh just another old white dude”, but not come to the same conclusion with Trump? They are both old white dudes. So where are you getting this from? This is YOUR perception.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The bare minimum job requirement to being a politician is getting elected. If democrats can’t nail messaging like republicans then that’s on them, not on the average voter. Inflation didn’t really ramp up until trump left office and even though his actions contributed to this ramp up, the effects weren’t felt in full force until after he left. So what happens if you run on “we’re not trump”? People think back to the trump years, and other than when covid hit (which people can excuse as not the fault of the president), the economy seemed to be doing great, and there certainly wasn’t as big of an inflation problem as now.

              Also, democrats had multiple candidates running in 2020 who weren’t “another old white dude” but they asked all the candidates they could to clear the way for biden because they needed to focus their efforts to defeat their most feared enemy: Bernie Sanders.

        • mockernicholas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Man I would love to see this, but its one of those things that I will believe when I see. I hope I have to eat my words on that too. Even if so, I dont think decriminalization would mean much to people in terms of getting out to vote. Most people who are really passionate about this over other issues have had the states handle it for them already. Dems waited too long for Federal Decriminalization to be a big motivator in a national election in my opinion.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              They also divy it up so that it’s not really a victory. “We legalized weed*!”

              * For everyone over the age of 65, anybody who was born rich, if you own three patagonia jackets and people who attended an invitation only dinner with a bunch of billionaires.

              Then moderates turn around and whine “Why doesn’t anyone give credit to Democrats for all the good they’ve done???”

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If biden loses, a big part of why will be the single issue “genocide Joe” kids who, like their predecessors, The Bernie Bros, took their vote and went home over something that was much smaller than the potential loss of democracy.

        Downvote all wish, the fact remains: had the Bernie bros not thrown a temper tantrum, there’s a good chance 2016 could have turned out differently.

        Disagreeing does not make this untrue.

        • diannetea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          When do we get to blame the shit candidate who lost instead? Bernie didn’t ignore and not campaign in multiple states because he thought they were in the bag, that was Hillary. Bernie didn’t conspire with the dnc to put up the worse polling candidate because it was “their turn”, that was Hillary. Bernie supporters didn’t say “we don’t need your vote” to the progressive voters, those were Hillary supporters.

          This shit makes me want to write Bernie in instead of holding my nose and voting for Biden like I did last time.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            When the polls reflect the proper amount of democratic voters during the election.

            You fail to realize that when people stay home and don’t vote- it shows. So we’re well aware of how many of you “democrats” stayed home in 2016.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The whole ‘bernie bros’ voting red is a digital propaganda point started by t_d, and spun off into 3 different Bernie subreddits that coincidentally were all modded by people from t_d.

          They worked tirelessly to flood facebook so it LOOKED like ‘bernie bros are gonna vote against their best interests in spite’.

          I mean there were a few actual progressives that flip flopped but most of them voted Jill Stein.

            • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Are you deliberately trying to shift the goalposts? I’m not talking about ‘people who stayed home’ because it is functionally useless to try and estimate the absence of considering a third or more of eligible voters just simply never turn up in any election.

              The claim was disenfranchised Bernie supporters switched their votes to trumpty dumpty. The articles you linked do not support that, which is why you shifted to ‘stayed home’

              That is not intellectual honestly.

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Talk about shifting goalposts…. I’m not talking about Bernie bros voting for Trump, you are. I never was, yet YOU comment to me about to change the subject to what YOU wanted it to be.

                I was talking about everyone staying home and not voting like the “gEnOciDe jOe” people now. are now. Like the Bernie bros- they got butthurt over something smaller than the big picture and fucked it all up for everyone.

                Then, in the aftermath, they claimed innocence and pointed the finger at other factors that were irrelevant. Which is VERY similar to what you are doing.

                I’m done arguing about this. It’s pointless here. Lemmy is as bad as Reddit when it comes to hive mind mentality.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  >Bernie bros- they got butthurt iver something smaller than the big picture and fucked it all up for everyone.

                  >Then, in the aftermath, they claimed innocence and pointed the finger at other factors that were irrelevant. Which is VERY similar to what you are doing.

                  wrong on basically every account.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            There’s a damn good chance that even more will die per minute if Trump is elected- but you can add to that his promise that he will absolutely be a dictator from day one. He’s already said he has no issue using our own military against us if necessary.

            What do you think this all means exactly?

            Go ahead. I’ll await your response.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              israel’s end goal is complete ethnic cleansing of Palestine. They will achieve that whether biden or trump is in office. There is no worse candidate in this particular case, because both unconditionally lick the ass of israel.

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Are you having difficulty keeping up with the point of my original comment?

                It’s entirely fair and necessary to criticize ANYONE for the things they do that fly in the face of human decency…

                But I’m not talking about criticism. I’m talking about the people that admittedly are blatantly refusing to vote because of it- while simultaneously thinking it won’t be their fault when we wind up with a dictator in a throne.

                Because they WILL be blamed for this.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It won’t be their fault. It’s their vote. It’s up to the candidate to win the vote. If they don’t win the voter’s vote; say, by aiding in a genocide, then it’s the candidate’s fault. We need to stop blaming voters because they don’t condone genocide, and start blaming candidates for abiding it.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re right, those children deserved to die!!! In fact, democrats should run on the messaging of “fuck them kids”, that’ll get voters to eagerly run out and vote for them.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You appear to have more concern for their children’s safety than 74% of Palestinians do. Hamas puts their lives in jeopardy, uses them as human shields, yet still remains popular.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Do you honestly think the Palestinians don’t care about their children? You’re just repeating israeli propaganda that dehumanizes Palestinians. Please think before spreading such fascist sentiments.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Having contempt for voters is like blaming the weather when it rains. Maybe the candidate should have came prepared with an umbrella, but here we are.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s right. Biden is coasting into this election. Reminds me of Hillary in 2016.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Eh, Obama went hard on election stuff and so did Bill. This hubris seems recent and tied to a belief that Trump isn’t a serious candidate.

        • Blackmist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Did the same thing with Dubya.

          “That other guy is terrible” is a really bad way to go into an election.

          Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does. Being the incumbent doesn’t help either, because if you do say you know how to fix things the obvious reply is “well why haven’t you done it then?”

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does.

            I would argue both sides know how to fix things but neither one is willing to do ALL the work required … especially when it comes to re-regulating Wall St, taxing the rich across the board (like they were post-WW2), and clamping down on the billions of dollars donated through super PACs that essentially buys elections.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            the Clinton campaign proposed intentionally cultivating extreme right-wing presidential candidates, hoping to turn them into the new “mainstream of the Republican Party” in order to try to increase Clinton’s chances of winning.

            Gotta love this 'murican culture of nurturing the worst of the worst then wondering why it backfires. Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and the Colombian drug cartels come to mind.

      • echoct@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s almost like it’s on purpose… Like the offense and defense of the capital class…

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s because the corporatists that control the messaging want some periodic austerity to keep the working class in line. “You should be happy with what we give you” or something like that.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Centrist Democrats would rather lose and have a hereditary dictatorship run by the Trump family than treat workers with respect.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m sure Biden and “his team” want to win, but not at any cost. Certainly not at the cost of taxing his donors and using the money to help the working class.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Of course congress wouldn’t pass anything like that. Ultimately they all play for the same team-- Capital. The “bully pulpit” and executive orders are largely reserved for things like supporting genocide, and antagonizing our geopolitical rivals.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Even a clearly over reaching executive order that immediately gets smacked down by the courts would relieve the pressure.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ahh yes, the classic “there’s no reason to support good policies because other people do not.”

        What a bunch of losers.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmy is largely populated by children who lack the intellectual maturity to appreciate that democracy is about compromise and that winning elections doesn’t mean that you get to do everything you want.

        There’s this myth that somehow Biden can just wave a magic wand and get everything he wants, but he’s not doing it because in spite of being arguably the most powerful man on the planet, he’s secretly in the pocket of corporate America. It’s a very childish view of the world and is entirely disconnected from reality.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is an extremely common trope from establishment Democrats who like to pretend the left is just naive children. Let me make this perfectly clear to you. Yes, we get politics. Yes, we understand that Biden can’t get everything he wants. Yes, we get that Republican obstruction is a thing.

          Now, here are some things for you to try and grasp. Most of the time, Biden and the Democratic establishment is leading the opposition against the left. The establishment also plays dirty to get their unpopular candidates past the primary, then blames the left when they lose in the general.

          It’s not generally the politically active left that doesn’t vote blue. Most of us are well practiced at holding our noses at the ballot box. It’s normal non-political Americans who see no point in getting engaged when neither party even speaks to their problems.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Both parties in the US are in the pocket of corporate America to some degree (Citizens United made it legal anyways), it’s just that one party actually cares about having a functioning country with a decent living standard for people and the other will happily burn it to the ground to hurt minorities and gain short-term power. What you see is the frustration in the general US population that sees the Republicans openly ruining things while the Dems have their hands tied by the underhanded tactics Republicans use and talk about “reaching across the aisle” and compromising with the fascists. Stuff gets done, but you often don’t hear about it or openly see the effects of Elizabeth Warren taking corporations to account for their actions compared to the 1.3 anti-trans laws per day that Republicans tried to pass in the first 6 months of last year.

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, and democracy isn’t perfect.

          We’ve seen that from the very beginning of the US.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Who knows what’s happening in their heads… but my guess is they think that once the ‘3rd party people’ fall back in line they will regain the lead so they don’t have to worry. And the rest is Biden being as establishment as you can get so obviously he’s not interested in any radical policy changes.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Valid criticism. The left has been brilliant at ignoring what used to be their core problem field.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just a quick fyi here:

    Kudos to the Guardian for calling Trump a demogogue. At least they say the truth when no North American news source will.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s just bullshit. Many North American publications have called him far worse than a demagogue. You’re saying something that “feels” right but that isn’t actually true. It’s part and parcel with how disconnected from reality so many of us have become.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Communist Trolls: The left doesn’t say enough bad shit about Trump!

        Left and center news calling him a white supremacist, neo-nazi courting, racist, rapist, cheating, fat fuck, and now smelly fascist for 8 years now.

        Suckers for propaganda: Uhhh… Biden supports Jews exterminating Muslims! I’m helping!!! Why didn’t all of America vote for Bernie! It was the evil Democrats! It couldn’t be that he was more popular and appealed to the sensitivities of anyone over the age of 40! Nor could Bernie court enough young voters to care to vote.

        This coming from someone that has voted for him every chance I got. Which was exactly once lol. Bernie hasn’t challenged him for the nomination at all. There’s a reason why, and it isn’t because he’s cowtowed.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    With an election coming up, the Schrodingers Leftist dilemma is in full force, even on Lemmy -

    Where we’re simultaneously both powerful enough to be personally behind every Republican win of the past 20 years, and also so insignificant that we must be ridiculed and bullied at every turn to remind us that we have NO PLACE in their party they blame us for not backing.

    The best part is that most of the time people hit both sides of the coin in the same comment.

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can look at my post history and see I’m pretty far left, but I’ll be pinching my nose and voting for Joe Brandon, the reason the GOP has built so much power over the years is because their base always pinches their nose and toe the party line. Voting for the lesser evil is still keeping less evil out of the world.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        8 months ago

        Voting for less evil is still addition of evil. Everyone parrots this “blue no matter who” shit but dems have done nothing to stop fascism or serve the needs of citizens, because they benefit from those systems and citizens going without. Voting mid right instead of far right is still voting for the right, voting Democrat doesn’t stop the march to fascism, it just delays the official kick off date by 4 years as Republicans continue to seize power unchecked from the bottom up.

        I’ve always voted third party and will continue to do so cause I’m over this vote between fascism and fascism but with a rainbow pin on its cap. If Democrats wanted the votes to beat Trump, they should have run Bernie who won the primary in 2016 instead of running status quo Hillary then having a court decree that their voters are, legally, not shit to them.

        I’ve said it before and I’ll keep shouting it from the rooftops - if leftists are so fucking important to Democrats maybe they should stop dedicating their lives to insulting and belittling us. 🤷

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you vote third party you have no right to cry when Trump win. You are as much responsible for it as anyone who didnt vote.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you vote Democrat you have no right to cry when Trump win. You are responsible for voting for a party that explicitly demonizes half of their supposed base as they screech at us for not voting for them.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            “I’m so against moving away from my right wing duopoly I’m going to call the guy who’s only a few shades less right wing and has done nothing to stem the rise of fascism because his party benefits from the same mechanisms being exploited by fascists ‘oUr OnLy ChAnCe.’”

            Voting for Biden doesn’t stop fascism, it delays it for 4 years as dems continue to turn a blind eye to fascists overriding every system from the bottom up until next time.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not the leftists. Oh the Democrats blame it on them. But we saw this in 2016 with Hillary. It’s a hurt working class that feels like they’re being ignored.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “leftists” is just what the centerists are willing to call us even if it’s not technically correct. The point is they blame us for not winning the general elections but outright vote against us in the primaries. It’s fucking pathetic.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          All I know is I get called a socialist all the time and I can’t get in contact with this Soros guy for my check. Seriously though, it is pretty screwed when you can tell whose going to get the nomination by who gets the party chair positions.

    • willis936@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If Biden doesn’t at least say he wants to do something about housing affordability then I won’t be voting. I’ve voted blue my entire life.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dems are just mid rights who don’t care if you’d rather slave away and not afford healthcare or housing with a masculine pronoun instead of feminine (or vice versa)

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hamas-destroy-israel-ceasefire_n_6576fac1e4b0881b7917ddab

        “I strongly support and wish and hope that the United States will support the United Nations resolution that was vetoed, that we vetoed the other day,” Sanders said. “That was a humanitarian pause, humanitarian cease-fire, that would have by the way called for the release of all of the hostages held by Hamas, and would have allowed the U.N. and other agencies to begin to supply the enormous amount of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people.”

        However, he added, “in terms of a permanent cease-fire, I don’t know how you can have a permanent cease-fire when Hamas, who has said before October 7th and after October 7th that they want to destroy Israel ― they want a permanent war. I don’t know how you have a permanent cease-fire with an attitude like that.”

        Weak shit tbh

        Better than nothing, but it was a pause regardless of him trying to spin it as a ceasefire.

        • Adub@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The rare W for Senator Sanders right there and now he is backpedaling so his base will still buy his books in the future.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sanders is stuck in the bygone era of Labour Zionism and doesn’t seem to realize that his statement about Hamas applies to modern Israel too - you can’t have a permanent cease-fire with a settler-colonial entity, who has made it very clear that they want to annex the territory.

            • Adub@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It is strange that the the American radical left abandoned Labour Zionism after the USSR conducted the trials like the Doctors’ plot & decided selling weapons to Arabs to kill Jews was the way to go. Solidarity is quickly dispensed with when principles are weak. Maybe Sanders error is the same as people supporting Houthis now?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                The American radical left grew an anti-colonial character alongside the rise of Black Nationalism and the American Indian Movement, the breakup was inevitable because Labour Zionists were trying to build socialism in an apartheid colorismo ethnostate on stolen land 🤷‍♀️

                Without any international left holding them back, Revisionist Zionism conquered Israel and now they’re just openly fascist genocidal freaks. Sanders still thinks there’s a rational Zionist entity to negotiate with, but that ship sailed a long time ago.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s the same with the AFD in Germany. People were so busy insulting those who vote AFD and telling them how stupid they are that now even more people vote AFD. I wonder how anyone thought this was going to make them vote for a different party?

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Centerists literally screaming at people they have to vote Democrat because a vote for a third party will destroy democracy.

      These are the same people who voted for Biden in the primaries intentionally to block progressive and leftist candidates from getting elected and now they want to act like we’re responsible for propping up their garbage candidate.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah Biden lost me when he outlawed the rail strike (please dont link me to electrical union statement). Frankly its just been downhill from there anyway.

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t link you evidence that the unions themselves thanked Biden for his help and they got what they wanted without striking?

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        he outlawed a rail strike and you want to link me a statement from an electrical union that opposed the strike from the beginning and always had sick days. And then I point out how not everyone got any sick days from this, the ones who did didnt get what they would have gotten from a strike, and outlawing strikes poisons any future union bargaining. Im tired of fuckin democrats coming in here to tell me how it was a good thing that the unions didnt get to collective bargain, they dont need any influence on labor because employers and the government have their best interests in mind.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Most of us rank and file union members think that he did what he had to do because inflation was already out of control and shutting down the railroads risked tipping the country into recession which would’ve guaranteed a “red wave” election in '22 as well as the reelection of Trump, both of which would be far more dire for working people.

          Local 10 till I die!

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            damn man union members not even believing in collective bargaining. Yeah, it would have had consequences, that’s why it works. And it historically improves the economy, with increased pay for workers able to spend more into the economy.

          • Adub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            “Leftist”/Dum-Dum left yet again being the most anti-labor aspects of the Democrat party despite waving union issues around, sadly. They are so fickle and searching for some wild thing to justify quitting & trying to hand the GOP a win at a moments notice. They won’t put the work into listening to great workers like yourself & what it takes to get the job done.

              • Adub@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The are reasons for strikes and goals behind them. The strike isn’t the thing they are after its a tactic for getting the deals labor wants. You have to follow the whole labor negogation and negogations didn’t end because the strike was. The only hiccup was sick days and many of thd unions got that in the end.

                You are looking for something superfical to be angry about.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        One rich IBEW pencil pusher doesn’t represent every rail worker. You know how we determine the will of that many people? Through voting and they voted against the contract Biden shoved down their throats.