• Blackout
    link
    fedilink
    3338 months ago

    no cost

    I think the head of a CEO somewhere just exploded.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      368 months ago

      and every conservative congresscritter, for some reason. ‘couldn’t this be done in the private sector’

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      CEOs are usually not relying as much on taxes. That’s why it’s free, this is a way to justify tax usage by developing public outreach.

      • FeminalPanda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        Walmart CEO definitely relies on taxes, food stamps, WIC, and other programs. ISP CEOs took tax money for Internet upgrades and did nothing. Multiple bailouts for business that they squandered on stock buyback.

      • FeminalPanda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Walmart CEO definitely relies on taxes, food stamps, WIC, and other programs. ISP CEOs took tax money for Internet upgrades and did nothing. Multiple bailouts for business that they squandered on stock buyback.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    1448 months ago

    With this being a free service, I feel like calling it NASA+ is a bit misleading. To me, I feel like the “+” indicates a paid, premium service. If it wasn’t for the title of this post that clarifies that it’s free, I probably wouldn’t have even considered installing the app based on the name, alone.

    Either way, this is great news! I’m probably gonna check this out once it’s available. I wish they’d have a release date, though. The official page just says “Coming soon”.

  • @Stamets@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1208 months ago

    Huh. There’s no geolock on this either? Fantastic. As a Canadian I tend to get blocked from this kind of stuff. This will be super cool. Might even replace my LCARS screensaver after years of use

    • NegativeNull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      50
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ever since Canada created the elegantly named “Canadarm”, NASA and Canada have been besties.

      To say nothing of possibly the greatest Astronaut to fly to the Space Station: Chris Hadfield

    • Chetzemoka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 months ago

      The US federal science agencies are generally pretty happy with sharing things. If it’s free to the US public, it’s free to the world and I love that. Best possible use of my tax dollars.

      (We also share weather and hurricane data with the Caribbean countries, for example. None of them could individually afford what the US is doing, so I’m happy we share.)

    • Obinice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      I’m still using a particularly excellently implemented Matrix screensaver from XP, hehe.

      And what’s that (less authentic looking but still great) one for Linux terminals? cmatrix I think?

  • @IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1018 months ago

    I posted on Lemmy about needing recommendations for movies to watch on shrooms…and then minutes later stumble across this article.

    Talk about perfect timing, lol.

    This is really starting to feel like a perfect replacement for that…other website.

  • @Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    718 months ago

    NASA+ will be available on most major platforms via the NASA App on iOS and Android mobile and tablet devices; streaming media players such as, Roku, Apple TV, and Fire TV; and on the web across desktop and mobile devices.

    What’s the betting it won’t be on LG’s WebOS though? 😭

          • LUHG
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            Usually yes, Plex is slow as shit but honestly iPlayer is still fantastic even on a b7 2017 oled.

            • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              That’s good; it stopped working on my aunt and uncle’s Sony (although I guess it’s a bit old now, it still works well) so had to get them a Fire stick instead.

      • SeaJ
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        148 months ago

        Get a streaming stick. The hardware TV manufacturers use to run their OS is generally bottom of the barrel and is sluggish as hell.

      • appel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Their OLED panels are top notch, so don’t sleep on it. Just get a separate streaming device as the experience on Roku, Android TV and Apple TV is just miles better.

      • thanevim
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        As others have said, don’t buy TVs for their smart features. Just use a streaming stick. They are easier to replace as software changes, and there’s practically no real benefit to ever putting a TV online in the first place.

        Also, LG panels are the best visual quality. You’re doing good going the LG route. Just keep it offline.

      • @slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        LG OLEDs are amazing, worth the price. Their OS is also very good compared to other TVs, I used it for years without an outside player. Now I have an Apple TV, which is better, but I still miss the LG’s magic controller.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        378 months ago

        Not only is it not allowed to be DRM’d, “US government IP” is itself an oxymoron: stuff published by the government is Public Domain, so it doesn’t even count as “intellectual property [sic]” to begin with.

    • @gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      438 months ago

      Most NASA stuff is published under non affiliation free use license - you can do what ever you like with it.

    • @Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      198 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a majority of the content is already freely downloadable from somewhere…

      • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        538 months ago

        A budget that goes into space exploration, development of groundbreaking science that has its use both in space and on Earth, popularization of science among masses, democratizing access to cutting-edge knowledge, making it free for everyone, including kids and the poor, to access at any time? Yes, please.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -98 months ago

              Probably true to some extent. Though, at what point do you decide it’s better to just directly give the money to people?

              • @flerp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                Considering it is such a small percentage of the budget and they have developed so much useful technology (https://www.howtogeek.com/831363/these-nasa-innovations-are-all-around-us-everyday/)

                I would say, take the money from other things that suck, like handouts to the rich and wasteful military overspending which would easily cover the things we need to cover. Defunding NASA would contribute to the dummification of the country and is a terrible idea.

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  08 months ago

                  Considering it is such a small percentage

                  Currently, but during many of the innovations it was a much higher percentage. And why do you assume there wouldn’t be other, maybe more impactful innovations, if NASA money and NASA researchers weren’t working on something else?

              • themeatbridge
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                There’s no situation where it isn’t better to just give the money directly to the people who need it.

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That would be great, but that’s not NASA’s department. Try Congress first. Then the DOD. Edit: and then the morally bankrupt billionaires.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              I’m not advocating NASA donate the money, I’m advocating considering cutting NASA’s budget

        • @greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -258 months ago

          Especially if you don’t live in the shitty country. Yes please, sacrifice the physical and mental wellbeing of Americans for an indepth knowledge of the Universe just before you regress into full facism. Your war crimes won’t be overlooked though.

          • DarkenLM
            link
            fedilink
            268 months ago

            I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

            I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            118 months ago

            NASA isn’t sacrificing American’s wellbeing, regressing into fascism, or committing war crimes. That’s multiple other branches of the government. Despite whatever media you’re consuming the US gov isn’t one unified dictatorship, as much as a certain political group would like it to be.

            NASA is one of the few branches of our government that’s actually somewhat decent and doesn’t need a complete overhaul to benefit our country or world. It’s already paying us back the relatively small budget allocated to them in several ways. So your comment is basically a whataboutism.

      • @dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        The funny thing with tax is you don’t get choose how it’s spent. Tax money is public money that ought to be spent in the public interest, and NASA is a perfectly good example of this. Other good examples are infrastructure, parks, public healthcare and free education. Bad examples of tax expenditure are the ridiculous military complex, massive corporate subsidies and contractors doing poor work that the government should be directly controlling.

  • @Sygheil@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 months ago

    *Previously on Desperate Spacewives…

    Sam has just kicked out of the airlock apartment by his wife Karen. Would his other woman save him from radiation and lack of oxygen? Tune in to this episode of Desperate Spacewives

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    If it’s called NASA Plus, how is it free? The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

    Don’t get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they’re just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn’t be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      938 months ago

      The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

      Notepad++ enters the chat

    • @ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      398 months ago

      I don’t think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It’s like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It’s just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you’ll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

      What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

          • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            I like how confident you are about your answer.

            However, perusing the USDA website one comes across this set of “strongly” worded guidelines:

            “Can a product be labeled “organic” without being certified? If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified.”

            “If you are not certified, you must not make any organic claim on the principal display panel or use the USDA organic seal anywhere on the package. (see exemption below)”

            “You may only, on the information panel, identify the certified organic ingredients as organic and the percentage of organic ingredients.”

            Apparently, if a company does mislabel its products, it is liable to be prosecuted by the Federal trade commission.

            • @thereisalamp@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified.

              That word probably exists in the same article you originally linked.

              But many actually don’t do it which is why they don’t use the USDA certified

        • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          You realize I can slap the word organic on anything, and it isn’t using the certified organic label… right? Want some “organic ATX motherboards?” I gotchu.

        • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          Compared to the standards for organic in civilized countries, that’s basically nothing.

    • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      388 months ago

      Looks like they refer to adding their Science wing into the streaming, too.

      In this crazy capitalist world peiple started forgetting that public services can be free, like, for real :D

    • @dbilitated@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      298 months ago

      plus just means more I think, they’re adding to their service so it’s “plus”

      just because that’s usually a hook to get you to pay more doesn’t mean that’s now the definition of the word

      • @gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -78 months ago

        sure. However “plus” means that something is additional to something else. And the question here is what is the basic product that makes this one be the additional

        • @0xD
          link
          English
          9
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You’re really trying to make this more complicated than it is. Should they just call it NASA? NASA Streaming? NASA VOD?

          It’s just a catchy name.

              • @gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                From their generic FAQ:

                What is Disney+?

                Disney+ is the streaming home for entertainment from Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic.

                from my limited perspective, the word “plus” is to indicate the rest studios/companies that are included in the Disney (parent) company

            • GreyBeard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              That’s actually what it has kinda came to mean. Lots of Streaming services are called “Plus”, even if they don’t have a separate non-free version.

      • @flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        What do you expect? “We’re not hosting an intergalactic kegger down here!”

    • hamid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      The Plus is that all the space stuff and exploration is a plus because in reality it is funded by the military industrial complex to help them make efficient weapons as their primary focus

    • Meowing Thing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Mauve for this you’ll need to have an account? This would already help nasa market products towards you and this is a good value they can get without you paying anything.