• Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      A budget that goes into space exploration, development of groundbreaking science that has its use both in space and on Earth, popularization of science among masses, democratizing access to cutting-edge knowledge, making it free for everyone, including kids and the poor, to access at any time? Yes, please.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Probably true to some extent. Though, at what point do you decide it’s better to just directly give the money to people?

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              There’s no situation where it isn’t better to just give the money directly to the people who need it.

            • flerp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Considering it is such a small percentage of the budget and they have developed so much useful technology (https://www.howtogeek.com/831363/these-nasa-innovations-are-all-around-us-everyday/)

              I would say, take the money from other things that suck, like handouts to the rich and wasteful military overspending which would easily cover the things we need to cover. Defunding NASA would contribute to the dummification of the country and is a terrible idea.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Considering it is such a small percentage

                Currently, but during many of the innovations it was a much higher percentage. And why do you assume there wouldn’t be other, maybe more impactful innovations, if NASA money and NASA researchers weren’t working on something else?

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That would be great, but that’s not NASA’s department. Try Congress first. Then the DOD. Edit: and then the morally bankrupt billionaires.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not advocating NASA donate the money, I’m advocating considering cutting NASA’s budget

      • greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Especially if you don’t live in the shitty country. Yes please, sacrifice the physical and mental wellbeing of Americans for an indepth knowledge of the Universe just before you regress into full facism. Your war crimes won’t be overlooked though.

        • DarkenLM@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

          I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          NASA isn’t sacrificing American’s wellbeing, regressing into fascism, or committing war crimes. That’s multiple other branches of the government. Despite whatever media you’re consuming the US gov isn’t one unified dictatorship, as much as a certain political group would like it to be.

          NASA is one of the few branches of our government that’s actually somewhat decent and doesn’t need a complete overhaul to benefit our country or world. It’s already paying us back the relatively small budget allocated to them in several ways. So your comment is basically a whataboutism.

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      …or about 3% of the military budget. Quite a bargain.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The funny thing with tax is you don’t get choose how it’s spent. Tax money is public money that ought to be spent in the public interest, and NASA is a perfectly good example of this. Other good examples are infrastructure, parks, public healthcare and free education. Bad examples of tax expenditure are the ridiculous military complex, massive corporate subsidies and contractors doing poor work that the government should be directly controlling.