Former President Donald Trump was indicted for an unprecedented third time on August 1, adding another set of serious federal charges to the mounting legal issues he faces.

    • @Kinyutaka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6511 months ago

      Even after he is behind bars. Crazy as it sounds, he can run for President from prison.

      Not very effectively, but he can run.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike
        link
        fedilink
        2211 months ago

        One presidential candidate got 3.4% (more than all 3rd party candidates in 2020 combined) of the vote (over 1million votes) as a third party candidate while in prison in 1920.

          • Flying Squid
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            One of the few upsides of my living in Terre Haute, Indiana is that I can say I live in the same town Debs was from. They have a nice museum here dedicated to him in his former home. If you’re passing through Indiana, I do recommend an hour or two to see it. Bernie Sanders made sure to stop there during his 2016 campaign, if you need an endorsement.

            • @treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              14
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              FDR gets all the credit but without actual leftists like Debs (and all the workers who fought in solidarity with him) we’d still be sending our kids to work instead of school.

              That’s who this is.

              Bernie has his picture hanging on his office wall and he’s basically Bernie’s hero.

              • @CaptainBananaFish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                we’d still be sending our kids to work instead of school.

                We are. They’re letting 14 year olds bar tend in Wisconsin and McDonalds in Arkansas has been busted for employing 12 year olds. Several states are actively bringing back child labor.

                • @treefrog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 months ago

                  We are again.

                  The mistake of confusing the middle with the left over the last hundred years.

          • Chainweasel
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It makes sense though. Think about it like this, A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges. Trump could have placed a more loyal attorney general, nailed Biden on some bullshit petty offense that technically qualifies as a felony, and have his name removed from the ballot shortly before the election. Allowing felons to run for president defangs that particular power move. To disqualify someone the 14th amendment would have to be invoked, and should be in Trump’s case.

            • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges

              It’s how Putin and other despots have been doing it for a very long time.

            • Coelacanth
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              While I do see the validity of this argument, it still feels like treating the symptoms rather than the cause. If the fear is a sitting president welding his personal power to imprison (and thus disqualify) a political rival, isn’t the bigger problem that a sitting president has the power to do this in the first place?

              • @BlinkAndItsGone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                The Justice Department has to be able to indict people, that’s part of its function. And the DoJ is part of the executive branch. A good President will not use the DoJ for his personal political purposes, but the incentive to do so, if it was there, would be extremely powerful. I think it’s probably a good idea to remove it. If the people can’t be trusted not to vote for a criminal or a traitor, we have bigger problems.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            I’ve heard the logic is to prevent people from wanting to retroactively legalize shit to secure votes from felons, which doesn’t make a lot of sense tbh

      • @rollerbang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        Weird. I’ve heard of Americans losing their right to vote when imprisoned and yet they could run for office?

        • @FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          2711 months ago

          If he wins, he pardons himself from federal crimes then uses his powers as Commander in Chief to break himself out of prison for state crimes, thereby creating the ultimate constitutional crisis and tearing the country apart.

          • BarqsHasBite
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Whether or not he can pardon himself is up for debate. So if the founding fathers intended that you can assume office from prison there would be a more defined method.

            • @Neoncamouflage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              3311 months ago

              Or we need to admit that the founding fathers may not have predicted literally every possible circumstance to arise in the future hundreds of years.

              • BarqsHasBite
                link
                fedilink
                -211 months ago

                This isn’t a new modern invention. The election process is pretty well defined.

            • @Skyrmir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              911 months ago

              It was intentional that you can run and be elected as president from prison. It’s written about contemporaneously. They knew the risk of allowing a president, or administration, jailing their political opponents.

              What’s not clear is if it was meant for a president to be able to pardon themselves. I personally would think not, but many think it’s permissable.

    • @ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      It’ll be ~5 years before all appeals are exhausted. I’d be shocked to see that he ever eats a final conviction, and any Republican president will pardon him, living or dead.

      And, even if he is convicted and not pardoned, the functional challenges of managing Secret Service protection in a white-collar prison would be daunting, not to mention that his SS detail seems to have been easily corrupted to lie for him. The SS leadership, a locus of supreme bootlickers, would likely tell an inquiring judge that it’s too difficult to protect him in any penal institution for white-collar criminals, which will force the court to choose house arrest at most.

      So, it’s probable that he’ll never serve a day in jail or prison.

  • Raging LibTarg
    link
    fedilink
    6011 months ago

    There are many who choose not to celebrate until the Orange One has had “actual repercussions”.

    Me? Well…

    To each their own. 🥂🍻🍸🍷

    • @GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I just keep imagining that he’s currently crying into a big mac right now. “Do you think they have Diet Coke in prison?”

    • @Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      To each their own indeed. If you want see this as cause to celebrate who am I to rain on your parade, I truly hope you have the right of it.

      I’m just exhausted from all of the "final nail in the coffin"s this guy has had. Ive gotten excited for some actual justice just to be disappointed 1 too many times I guess. Even now, any federal charges are gonna just get pardoned as the first act of the next republican president for some quick and easy brownie points amongst their base.

      The only hope for lasting consequences is realistically Georgia and even ignoring that they are pretty deeply purple, the Secret Service has pretty explicitly said they will not allow Trump to go to prison… Now I personally am of the belief that they can pound sand since they have no jurisdiction over this. However I do not get to make the call, and as stated above I have been let down too many times…

      Maybe this is actually it and maybe I’m just too jaded and not seeing the big picture… I just can’t bring myself to be optimistic anymore man

      • Raging LibTarg
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        the Secret Service has pretty explicitly said they will not allow Trump to go to prison…

        Woah woah woah woah, did they say this? A cursory Google search only came back with results stating he won’t lose their protection in prison, not that they won’t allow him to be put away.

        As I have the right to celebrate all the recent unprecedented actions by DOJ (I must concede that DOJ dragged their feet on a lot of this, and that it’s pretty clear there’s a two-tiered system for the rich “important” types and the rest of us plebs), you certainly have the right to doubt that this all will lead to anything significant. I have nothing to support my belief that the Orange One has finally reached the “FO” stage of FAFO but the indictments that have occurred thus far. However, I will say with confidence that these indictments aren’t entirely meaningless (particularly the docs case), and that their unprecedented nature should be celebrated. The DOJ has taken steps that have literally never been taken before in our history as a country (the indictment of a former president), and while some might say justice delayed is justice denied, I still think that a slow response is better than no response at all.

        That all said, I understand feeling skeptical or even hopeless at this point (I certainly felt that way after Impeachment Trial 2). Here’s hoping, though, that we’ll at least get to witness justice finally being served and that any pardons will be moot (I mean, c’mon, the guy’s old!) if a Republican president is elected again any time soon!

        • @Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          It’s possible I’m misremembering. I thought in their initial statement about his not losing protection while incarcerated they had mentioned that it would be impossible to protect him while he’s in an open cell block but perhaps that was my dumb lizard brain saying the quiet part out loud. Either way I don’t think they would just let that happen without significant uproar.

          Idk maybe I can allow myself to feel an ounce of optimism. I do like the idea of something actually good happening for once lol

          • @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            It just means that IF he manages to get found guilt, and that is a BIG if, he will not go into prison like you or I think of it. He will get some sort of special consideration as part of some sweetheart deal to be confined to house arrest in Mara-la-go except for “special supervised outings related to ex-president business”. Which will really just turn out to be whenever he wants to go somewhere.

            So he will be convicted, but functionally it will only be on paper and just a technicality. All because no one is going to want to deal with the real world outcomes of an ex-president being sentenced to real hard time like not as well connected people.

            But I will be shocked if they can find 12 jurors that a good lawyer on either side would not be able to argue are truly impartial to even have a valid trial to begin with.

    • VCTRN
      link
      fedilink
      4911 months ago

      Nobody knows more about prison than me. I’m the best inmate they ever had. They love me here. I have the best cell, the best food, the best friends. I’m very popular. The guards respect me. They know I’m innocent. The fake news media and the crooked Democrats put me here. They’re very jealous of me. They’re losers. They’re afraid of me. They know I won the election by a lot. I’m still your president. I’ll be out soon. You’ll see. It’s going to be huge.

        • VCTRN
          link
          fedilink
          1111 months ago

          I know, also some covfefe and hamberders, for good measure. But AI can only do so much.

      • Bizarroland
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        And followed by Don Jr and co asking people to contribute to the “take back America” fund, and if you donate over $1,000 you will get 100,000 Trump bucks

        • @AssPennies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          And the exchange rate of tump bucks to stanley nickels is approximately the same as the ratio of unicorns to leprechauns.

        • VCTRN
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          Don’t forget the limited edition trading cards.

      • rebul
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        This is funny right here, I don’t care who you are.

        And God bless the pygmies…

    • @qooqie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I know this is a common sentiment amongst a lot of people, but the reality is he will never see prison time before he dies of old age. He will do everything in his power to draw it out and when he can’t he will flee the country

      • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1411 months ago

        It was “common knowledge” that he wouldn’t ever be charged too. The Senate and Mike Pence were pissed at him because he made them look weak. That’s why no one is really defending him right now. He has so many charges that people are going to abandon him just so they don’t have to answer questions about the cases.

        Remember the OJ trial? This is the former president in three courtrooms (and counting!). It’s going to make him look so guilty.

        • VCTRN
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          I don’t think anyone ever cared about him in the GOP, they used him as a tool, a pawn to get the presidency; he got it but still fucked it, and now they have not use for him anymore. DeSantis may be the next one. That’s my highly intellectual political analysis. Emphasis on “high”.

      • @GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Problem is, he’s losing a lot of that power now. He doesn’t have many friends in high places these days, even the supreme court has done things to rule against him. I don’t doubt he’ll try to draw it out, but ultimately it’s not up to him anymore.

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        -411 months ago

        His Secret Service detail won’t allow that to happen.

    • @smokestack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      46
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      12 jurors will decide on his guilt (the standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal case) after reviewing evidence during his trial which will probably happen next year. If found guilty, the judge will choose a sentence that’s within guidelines outlined in law. Then he’ll be pardoned by the next Republican president.

      • @LastSprinkles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Unless he’s the next Republican president and pardons himself, I wouldn’t be so sure that he’ll be pardoned.

        • @TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          1511 months ago

          Trump has such a large fanatical following that it’s almost certain the next Republican president will use a Trump pardon as a poker chip for gaining party support on whatever plan he needs pushed.

          So personally I think it’s almost certain Trump will be pardoned.

          But it’s possible he could die in prison before that happens.

      • @player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        The jury selection process will need to be particularly thorough for this trial to avoid a bias one way or another. It would be interesting to hear what questions they ask of potential jurors.

      • @randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        The real weirdness happens if he is found guilty under state charges (in New York) and wins the presidency. The federal president can’t pardon state charges - he would take the oath in prison!

    • @betheydocrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The difference between “charged” and “indicted” is who finds probable cause that you committed a crime. If it was a prosecutor, you are charged. If it’s a jury, you’re indicted.

      Accused, legally speaking, is a noun meaning a person who has been arrested for or charged with a crime

    • Plaid_Kaleidoscooe
      link
      fedilink
      1111 months ago

      Money seems to be the difference. I’ve been through the legal system and let me tell you that I wouldn’t be out campaigning if I had three indictments. I’d be sitting in a cell waiting for trial or a plea deal. The fact that he has been spared the same humiliation that anyone else would have been is a crime in and of itself.

    • @mycroft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      I’m not American, and I don’t know exactly what the legal differences are between “indicted”, “charged” and “accused”. When is he going to be put in handcuffs and detained in a jail cell like a normal person would be if they were suspected of committing a crime (like stealing a handbag for example) but not convicted yet?

      He is getting slightly better than normal rich person with expensive lawyer treatment.

      America, as a pure service economy has prices for bribery and extortion as well as minimum service levels for the legal system. If you pay for economy (with your life) you get a defense attorney appointed by the state who sits across from the judge and DA you’re going to have to deal with, and has lunch with them, or makes deals in the bathroom… They’ll fight to make sure their life doesn’t get disrupted a whole lot and they can keep defending the endless stream of defendants.

      The middle tier is the “hire a reptable firm, and get a junior associate” level of service, that’s where you get someone who’s overworked, and desperately trying to keep all their partner’s cases going, and they can spend 1/10th of their time on your case, they don’t have any worries about not having a job though so they can dedicate the time in court to defending you.

      The top tier is the “hire a reputable firm, and you get a named partner” they care about their reputation, and make sure they only take cases that will make them look good. And they look good by doing the best damn job they can in front of the cameras, in their filings, and in front of their client. You get the white glove treatment, and 90% of the time of the junior associates helping the partner.

      It’s no wonder why you typically only get the “Go home and sleep it off” result from an indictment from the highest tier of service.

  • @ZestycloseReception8@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    2711 months ago

    yeah and only in our wonderful country this schmuck is allowed to run for office from jail. I thought you can’t run for president after ur third indictment which he certainly has.

    • Flying Squid
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      There’s nothing in the Constitution that says you can’t run from prison (Eugene V. Debs did it in 1920), and it also says nothing about three indictments.

    • @Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      For some reason the founding fathers didn’t anticipate that someone running from prison could ever become president. To be fair, before this fuckin clown, nobody else did either.

      • Piecemakers
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Incorrect. There was one other, technically, and they got a sizeable amount of votes considering they were incarcerated at the time — not enough to win or even skew the election numbers, but still. It happened.

      • lol it was one of those things that was just assumed by the general population that was never gonna happen so why worry about putting laws in place to prevent it. I think it’s safe to assume that we need to put laws into to. prevent this from happening before 2027

  • @CuriousLibrarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2511 months ago

    I am so relieved that the special prosecutor is defending the rule of law with these indictments. If the Republicans (and not just Trump) got away with trying to overturn the election we could lose our democracy. We still can, but at least they are going to trial against this would-be tyrant and some of the people who helped him.

    • Square Singer
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      You kinda already did when the founding fathers wrote checks and balances into the constitution conveniently forgot that political parties are a thing.

      There are no checks and balances if the ones that are supposed to check and balance you are on your team.

  • @geekworking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    The next republican president or governor in states where he is convicted at state level will just pardon everything.

    The constitution, rule of law, and will of the people means nothing to people who just want power.

  • @MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Look at that man’s face.

    The living embodiment of everything I despise about my own self, distilled and propped up, for us all to marvel at. What a time to be alive.

    Dear aliens,

    I’m sorry. My species is a stain upon an otherwise beautiful nothing.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    1111 months ago

    Maybe this country isn’t so lost afterall. Maybe there is still time to turn it around.

  • @mrginger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1111 months ago

    We need to handle this carefully. I feel martyr vibes coming from all of this bullshit if he is found guilty. Maybe it’s the part of the US I live in, and the political slant of the people therein, but I see him and his supporters using this to do something even more epically stupid than trying to invade the capital.

    • On the other hand, if we’re afraid to prosecute insurrection leaders because of fear of resulting violence, that’s kinda definitionally terrorism (and specifically losing to the terrorists).

    • @Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Honestly good.

      The dipshits of the republican party are already committing acts of terror in the name of protecting insert fake concern here

      Like I don’t know why we’re treating them like a volcano about to blow, it’s been blowing for years now.

    • @hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      I’m not American, but I’ve been imagining a world where magas would take over Washington with guns.

      I don’t want it to happen, but I see it happening. Republicans are anti government.

      It would be quite entertaining, though. Not great, but still entertaining.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    1011 months ago

    Wasn’t he indicted before ? What happens next ?

    • Raging LibTarg
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      He was! He now has three indictments under his belt.

      1. New York State hush money payments
      2. Classified Documents Case
      3. January 6 Insurrection

      If you ask me, now we throw a few back tonight and wait for the fourth indictment coming from Georgia this month. 😎

    • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      …aight so I’m fucking stupid or something and can’t figure out how to link to another user’s comment (it’s just the chain link icon literally on the comment right? …but when I click that it directs to a different comment… is this a bug or am I really just stupid?) but I don’t want to just steal this guy’s work, some I’m linking to his profile instead:

      https://lemmy.world/u/jordanlund@lemmy.one

      In the comments tab, do a Ctrl+F search for “you are here” and you’ll find a map of exactly what happens next in this and every other trump case.

  • @TheDudeV2@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    I just finished reading every last word of the indictment. Interesting read. Trump and several of his co-conspirators are absolutely fucked (IMHO; I’m no lawyer).

    When I got to the end of the document I noticed a particularly poetic coincidence: “45”. As in, forty-five pages. President Forty-Five, the worst president this country has ever seen, and the first nail in his treasonous and metaphorical coffin ends with a sort of signature from the Defendent himself… 45.

  • @mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    So if he goes to federal prison, do the secret service members who are part of his detail draw straws to see who else gets to spend time being bars?