• RamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s been hard trying to ram into liberals’ thick skulls that the “lesser evil” voting shtick that comes every four goddamn years doesn’t quite energize people to haul their asses to the booths, especially when said lesser evil is the incumbent. But I’ve seen some come around recently, so it’s something.

  • newmou [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey champ, can we maybe not talk about genocide right now?? Huh bud? Chief? Can we not do that while the most important election of our lifetimes is happening?? That ok buddy?

    • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      1 year into the term: hey buddy it’s only been a year. These things take time. Be patient.

      2 years in: champ it’s almost midterms. We can’t lose the Senate over Palestine, the adults in the room have more important concerns.

      3 years in: fam we have [arbitrary self- or GOP-initiated crisis like a government shutdown or Supreme Court decision] to deal with. This has to wait. We only have so much political capital.

      4 years in: this is the most important election

    • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably any latinos that vote for Trump too. It happened in 2020 as well with neoliberal going from praising black voters for stopping Bernie to making racist comments about latinos for voting Trump in Florida.

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah. I’m cool with it. Fuck those fascist shitheads. Some reddit-logo were handwaving “Genocide Joe” saying it was a GOP talking point. Fucking hell. I used to wonder, how could the Holocaust happen? How could so many people be complicit in something so horrible? I still don’t understand it, but I’m afraid I’m starting to.

  • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rhetorical refuge of libs trying to vote scold right now is that genocide is going to happen either way, so you need to swallow your selfish pride and vote for the least bad genocide enabler.

    A vote for someone endorsing genocide is apparently not approval of the genocide either. Vote for genocide but shake your head while doing it so everyone sees you disapprove.

  • mittens [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At this point, does it even matter what their spin doctors and their strategic autopsies conclude? If an electoral system only presents two options against genocide: feverish support, or guilty complicitness then it’s fucking useless, it belongs in the garbage. It sucks that it took me a genocide to really really recognize how useless partisan electoralism is, because it’s hard to dispell the illusion that maybe it’ll give you some crumbs if the right guy comes along. Nope, not even in the face of genocide will it cede an inch.

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can line up along party lines because it spurs controversy, which increases turnout and publicity. There’s plenty of money floating to both sides to balance that out.

      Our cowardly, self-serving politicians won’t dare bite the hand that feeds them. The Mossad is our second pair of eyes in the Middle East, and Israeli backed AIPAC money runs deep in American politics.

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most low income people were materially better off under Trump, whose pandemic policies resulted in the lowest childhood poverty rate since the 90s. (These welfare policies were cancelled or expired under Biden.)

    Dems will still assume 3rd party and non-voters have a strong Biden preference.

    • GhostofLeninsGhost [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      If not for the pandemic, he wouldn’t have done any of it. It wasn’t a particular position of Trump’s to give that money, he just was in the position to do so at a time of crisis.

  • Clicheguevara [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, havent you heard? The dems won the Kentucky governors race by a few points so absolutely nothing has to change and Biden will breeze to victory in all the swing states polls say hes seriously underwater in

  • save_vs_death [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m expecting Islamophobia to become even more ingrained as usual with libs leading the charge and going “If Muslims didn’t want Islamophobia maybe they shouldn’t have voted for the Muslim ban president 💅”

  • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Idk tho today’s election results look pretty bad for the GOP lol. Just like the midterms did. Its possible that Joe himself will lose the presidency while GOP lose heavily elsewhere though? But like, the GOP is still dealing with a deflated base that got what they wanted in Dobbs and don’t care anymore, and continue to run on culture war bullshit that noone actually cares about.

    There’s also the issue of RFK Jr, who is apparently mostly pulling votes from Trump.

    Like yes absolutely 100% the genocide is going to deflate the zoomer vote* that helped Dems out so much in the midterms but I think the GOP is having electoral problems too, not the least of which that they support the Genocide too, which is going to make the whole thing a mess.

    *Not to mention the Muslim vote which obviously tanked for good reason, and is a material thing in at least one swing state.

    • S4ck [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s very easy to imagine democrats having a good election otherwise and just losing a couple of swing states and thus the presidency.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I was going to say, the GOP has failed to find a particular angle to go after. I think Trump’s legal problems are too confusing for the average chud to care about and it’s not enough for them to care about their local politicians, or it’s not something that grants them to say racist stuff.

      Also as dire as the culture war is, I do have a gut feeling that it’s just not enough to organize around. Conservative voters simply don’t care enough. Whether that’s because they don’t understand, or they have limited exposure to the trans people they’re supposed to hate, I don’t know. Transphobic legislation keeps failing when it’s up for public referendum. Abortion referendums keep failing to restrict abortion rights as well. Republicans have to keep slamming those through without votes through state supreme courts or legislature. You’re right, they’re getting what they want with abortion, it’s practically illegal in half the country. They’re failing to move onto whatever’s next.

      I don’t really know what the strategy is going to be here. The Republicans really do seem adrift when it comes to having a coordinated base, like I haven’t seen it like this since they failed to get interested in Mitt Romney in 2012, or I guess when Bob Dole failed to capture them in 1996.

      • Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conservative voters simply don’t care enough. Whether that’s because they don’t understand, or they have limited exposure to the trans people they’re supposed to hate

        I think that’s part of it. Trans people are such a minority you can go your whole life without knowingly meeting one if you don’t live on a major metro area. What they hate is a bunch of caricatures they see on online social media, but there isn’t much place to direct that hate. As opposed to the segregationist south, they had black people in your zip code they could easily walk up to and express their bigotry towards. It was easier to keep the hate flowing cuz there was actually a concrete “other” that was moving into your space. Some CHUD in Nebraska would probably have to drive two hours to find the nearest trans person. Not that they wouldn’t but it takes some time to coordinate that shit,

    • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At the risk of entertaining the lib in me, I do think investing in elections is fine for the left if it’s done as supplementary. But I’m surprised the People’s Party genuinely has gone absolutely nowhere.

      Republicans are running on brand loyalty alone, and dems are running on being a reaction to the GOP. I would think the People’s Party would try to get one small win in a pretty small state like Rhode Island, make the news or something. While I’m not kidding myself and can safely say that only dems or GOP will be relevant on a federal level, I find that there are small wins to be had at the state and local level, and a breath of fresh air would clown on both parties.