• hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Surprisingly enough, the infrastructure needed to support millions of people is a lot larger than the infrastructure needed to support a few tens of thousands.

    The enormous Gare du Nord, Paris, for example (also population 0):

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    7.8 million people in the Houston metro area, no shit the infrastructure is huge.

    • Expand that out to the greater Houston area to include everyone who drives to work every day and you have a highway system that needs to accommodate 10s of millions of people using it every day.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        needs to accomodate

        Wants to accomodate. Induced demand is a thing.

        It also works in reverse: Slowly remove lanes and sooner or later it will somehow accomodate everyone that needs to use it. Either by making the inner city more dense or by businesses moving away and distributing more.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    With this administration’s time and dedication, you too can have 30,000 people living under an intersection.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    One is beautiful, been there, seen it, it’s amazing

    The other is a horrendous post apocalyptic wasteland. Never been there, never will.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    True but that intersection is probably connecting between Houston and Austin which supports ~3M

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why not?

      If people didn’t want to live that close together, why was the village built?

      • BenevolentOne
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sienna was walled in at a time and place when roaming gangs of thugs could, and would, variously murder you everywhere outside the city walls.

        Pretty good reason to want to get really cozy with your neighbors. Might be a good time to revisit the concept in some places.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The village was settled back when global population was less than 2% of what it is now. There was probably a whole lot more space per resident back then. Not saying the interchange is a good use of space, obviously, but there’s certainly a happier medium than packing 30k people in the same size area.