• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • (1) Fields did win in college. At that level, you expect the elite of the elite to dominate.

    (2) it’s not Caleb or Fields, Fields + it’s what you can get for Caleb vs Caleb + what you can get for Fields.

    Caleb had an amazing sophomore season. He was efficient while putting up really big numbers, with another year of development to get even better. That’s what got him on the radar as a generational prospect. That tag was put on him last year. Then he took a step back as a junior. Put another way, if he hadn’t dominated as a sophomore he wouldn’t be in the discussion for #1 pick this year, and certainly wouldn’t have this “generational” can’t miss tag on him. So now you have to decide which is the fools gold, and that’s where the fans are. He wasn’t bad this year by any stretch, but also didn’t live up to the hype. Matt Leinart was also a lock #1 prospect until he returned for a final year.

    Much like Fields, having seen what he can do at the college level certainly impacts how you evaluate what he did this year. That’s not a bad thing, we did see how high the ceiling goes last year. That’s production on his game tape. But is that a realistic ceiling for him to hit in the NFL? His junior year being a downtick just has to create some pause when we’re discussing this. The things he put on tape this year feel a lot like what we’ve seen the last 3 years with Fields and that is concerning because of the value of the #1 overall pick. He holds the ball too long, and hangs on his reads trying to push the ball deep. Are we spending #1 on Fields v2?