The craze for Stanley stainless steel drinking cups reached new levels last week when a woman was arrested and accused of stealing 65 of them, worth almost $2,500, from a store in California.

Police in Roseville, in Placer County, northeast of Sacramento, said Sunday that they were called Wednesday to a report of a theft from a store on Stanford Ranch Road in the city.

“Staff saw a woman take a shopping cart full of Stanley water bottles without paying for them. The suspect refused to stop for staff and stuffed her car with the stolen merchandise,” police said in a statement on Facebook.

  • @Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    1255 months ago

    I went through a rollercoaster with this post.

    At first I thought someone stole multiple NHL Stanley cups of which there is one.

    Then I thought she was arrested because of the volume of cups she owned and no other reason.

    I thought this was an onion article. I’ll put myself to bed now.

    • @BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      435 months ago

      Then I thought she was arrested because of the volume of cups she owned and no other reason.

      “Idk what’s going on here, but you’re clearly out of control”

  • The Pantser
    link
    fedilink
    465 months ago

    Best thing about this craze and scalping trend is that there are thousands of insulated mug brands and many are just as good or better so you can just buy something else if you want.

    Unlike the GPU or PS5 scalping crazes.

      • @this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        Your obviously being sarcastic or ignorant. I did buy amd it was still expensive. And what do you think was making PCs expensive other than all of it… The freaking GPUs. Intel or amd.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            05 months ago

            Intel has integrated gpus on their mobile CPUs now.

            Allows you to turn off the discrete gpu and save power on laptops.

              • @IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Eh… The top of the line Arc GPUs are only competitive with budget line Nvidia and AMD GPUs at about the same price point. And their drivers have had a lot of compatibility issues. It’s an option, and I hope they get better, but they’re not really a serious competitor yet.

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              They have discrete GPUs now too. They’re currently basically just budget GPUs, but it looks like they may be actual competitors soon.

        • @this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I didn’t mention nvidia simply because they ended up screwing absolutely everybody over by stating that they were going to release some specific cards that were designed solely for crypto mining and then attempted to try and break their own firmware to prevent their graphical cards for gaming from being used for Bitcoin mining but that ended up being some b******* trickery they were a big portion of why the all of the cars ended up skyrocketing and price by allowing people to order multiples so that they could actually end up going for scalping blah blah blah blah blah I didn’t want to give them a platform so I left them out and once again you showed your ignorance By ignoring Intel I’m sorry for the long run on sentence I just don’t care to try and punctuate this

          Everything nvidia did drove prices up and made cards more scarce. Fuck them I switched to full AMD only because of them.

  • Jelloeater
    link
    fedilink
    English
    405 months ago

    I wanna see the mug shot… I’ll see myself out 🤣

  • hrimfaxi_work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    345 months ago

    This Stanley cup thing is pissing me off because I have one of those green trigger coffee mugs that needs a new lid. You can’t get replacement parts for practically any Stanley cup.

    I could get a different coffee cup, but why should I change when it’s these TikTok water cup weirdos that suck?

    • @frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      38
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The worst thing is that a lot of people aren’t even drinking out of them! They’re just collecting expensive ass mugs to put on display. As a leftist hydro homie, that’s so offensive to me. Buy one cup and put some damn water in it. Hydrate yourself and stop participating in OTT consumerism that just results in more shit in a landfill down the line, ffs.

      • hrimfaxi_work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I can understand having 2 or 3 to make sure you’re drinking out of something clean without having to disassemble the whole thing every day, but a friend from work showed me how some people have like 20 of these things. Defeats the purpose of a reusable cup when you have a couple dozen.

        Like you said, though. These aren’t being used for their initial purpose. They’re decor for lots of folks.

        …which honestly wouldn’t upset me so much if this automotive o-ring I’m using on my lid right now didn’t leak and/or they’d keep their hands off the other less twee Stanley stuff. I like my mug.

        • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Man, I get enough branded tumblers from work that I haven’t had to buy one like ever. Most recently I got a 48 ounce one that’s like only good for water because it’s too much of anything else

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    205 months ago

    I was so confused. I thought it was the hockey NHL Stanley Cup. Then it’s worth more than that. Then how are they multiple? Then are they like miniature novelty ones? Then how do you get so many to be worth that much?

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    Crime aside, if I ever spend $45 on a water bottle, you all have permission to kill me.

    • @TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Its a pretty good thing to spend money on if you use it on a daily basis. I work in a kitchen and need an insulated water bottle or I will literally die. Instead of using plastic I use a reusable bottle. I bought it a year ago and I have not looked back. Yeah, its more expensive than it needs to be and is a fad, but it’s certainly not the most irresponsible thing you can spend $50 on. edit: removed superfluous an

      • @Tbird83ii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 months ago

        I mean… It’s a lot of metal… And it’s strong enough to survive the job site for a decade.

        As someone who frequents construction sites for my job, and also as someone who has owned a Stanley travel mug and water bottle before whatever the fuck this fad is ( over 10 years… ), they are nigh indestructible, and they keep temperature for longer than either my wife’s Hydro flask or my yeti. So far in that sams period only my, Yeti coffee mug has survived as long. My wife has replaced her hyroflasj twice.

        Just anecdotal, but I tend to be hard on things, and it’s stayed with me this long… It’s like $4/year for a coffee mug.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        105 months ago

        Sure, but there are re-usable metal insulated bottles that are a lot less than $45 and will also last for years. This is $45 because it’s trendy.

        • @TIMMAY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah, cant deny that. Relative to no bottle, it’s better. Relative to other bottles, it’s bad. A middle ground would be nice. Id like to think that maybe the fad-aspect of it will increase the amount of water bottle users over all, but I’m very pessimistic about that. edit: spelling

      • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        65 months ago

        Those leach microplastic into your water. Don’t reuse them. Although any $1 water bottle is probably safe.

            • @ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              The main difference is microplastics are literally everywhere.

              Bought a plastic wrapped sandwich? Microplastics. Drank from a plastic cup? Microplastics. Ate something that was prepared in a factory with plastic packaging? Microplastics.

              Even things that don’t look like plastics like fast food foil wrappers are still full of microplastics.

              Idgaf anymore.

              • @Mamertine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                You missed a really big one of: did you wear clothing the has synthetic fibers? Bam! (Emeril voice) micro plastics.

      • @kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        I spent like $20 on two off brand metal ones and have used them for years now. Metal is easier to recycle and doesn’t contribute to micro plastics

    • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      I mean it would probably just about last a lifetime. Stanley are good bottles. Do you go through water bottles fast somehow?

        • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Well that’s not the water bottle’s fault. If you’re prone to losing things then yeah a lifetime purchase isn’t for you. I don’t buy nice sunglasses for that reason, lol.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        No, I don’t go through water bottles fast, which is exactly why I wouldn’t spend $45 on one.

    • N-E-N
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Not quite that expensive but, my LTT Water bottle is super nice tbh, no regrets

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        You can get highly rated mugs which are just as good for a lot less. You’re paying a premium for a brand name.

        Also, even an 18-oz Yeti is cheaper than one of these Stanley cups by $10-15.

  • @dmtalon
    link
    13
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Not every single day, but quite often, I’m reminded of how much I hate the general public and continue to be amazed at the new and exciting ways it’s shown off.

      • @dmtalon
        link
        15 months ago

        My wife and I align in this feeling pretty close. However I’m more rigid with my opinion of “people” in general.

        So many people just want to fit in, I’m just not like that. I’m me, and you get what you get. I’m not gonna play games to be like everyone else or fall into silly things like suddenly Stanley cups have some crazy value associated with them.

        Blah blah blah :)

  • @gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    125 months ago

    Completely off topic but…

    Does the Stanley cup have a sticker saying the product might cause cancer in the state of California?

    Also why does every product I see potential cause cancer in the state of California only?

    That is all. I’m too lazy to Google the question but thought I would annoy someone about it here.

    Thank you.

    • @JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 months ago

      California just has laws in place that requires items that have potential carcinogens to be labeled. That’s it.

      • @IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Well, that and their bar for what qualifies is really low. If a single study shows that a chemical agent may cause cancer in animals, it will be listed. It doesn’t actually have to be confirmed. Also, in many cases, manufacturers will simply put the label on their products by default to avoid being sued in California because it would cost them more to verify whether it contains one of the many listed chemicals or not. As such, the labels have largely become noise at this point.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      California law. proposition 65

      Basically, they have a list of things “known to the state of California to cause cancer”. If a material on that list is used in a product, that product needs to have a “proposition 65” warning label in order to be sold in CA.

      Which, since everything is a polluted mess, basically everything is on that list.

    • @ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      -15 months ago

      The bubble that regulates the weather at Disneyland has weird interactions with certain items, so California has to warn people.x

  • @Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    Hol-leee shit, $2500 worth of consumer goods trash. Put this woman in jail! If the government wasn’t so tied up on witch hunts, like Trump staging an insurrection, we would have to resources to weed out this trash once and for all.