The cost to overdraw a bank account could drop to as little as $3 under a proposal announced by the White House, the latest effort by the Biden administration to combat fees it says pose an unnecessary burden on American consumers, particularly those living paycheck to paycheck.

The change could potentially eliminate billions of dollars in fee revenue for the nation’s biggest banks, which were gearing up for a battle even before Wednesday’s announcement. Exactly how much revenue depends on which version of the new regulation is adopted.

Banks charge a customer an overdraft fee if their bank account balance falls below zero. Overdraft started as a courtesy offered to some customers when paper checks used to take days to clear, but proliferated thanks to the growing popularity of debit cards.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    I still don’t get how folks don’t love this president. All these things are great for typical folks like me.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well the repubs stopped him from doing all the things that would have made him amazing, so he obviously totally sucks.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would love to hear “listen Jack, we want to get stuff done but the Republicans are blocking everything we try to pass. Give me a strong majority in the house and senate and we will pass x, y, and z. If the supreme court blocks us, we’ll look at ways we can balance the court.”

          I just want to hear a plan and what we need to do to make that plan happen. You need 60 senate votes to pass universal healthcare? Say “give me 60 senate votes and we’ll pass universal healthcare”

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because it’s all tiny changes that don’t effectively help people. No big structural changes cause the billionaires managed to put a stop to that with their agents in the Senate. And so the average citizen is left to blame the person they see as the cause of it all, cause he’s the big boss obviously.

      Citation: gestures at everything

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        The things he has done do effectively help people, but since he doesn’t constantly brag about it people don’t notice.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        yeah still. I have never had so many beneficial things come out of a presidential term in my life.

        • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Trump got us “free cash” and virus test kits. Bush got us “free cash”.

          Obama got us crappy healthcare. Which he stole from Republcain Mitt Romney cause Obamacare is literally Republicans dream healthcare system.

          Nobody remembers the starting circumstances of the Democratic presidents brought in to clean up Republican messes.

          From my interactions with co-workers, it can be that simple. And also the trans trans trans are coming to steal your kids and wife. Diabolical

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            yeah in particular obama was just getting the economy going at the end of his term by slowly raising interest rates and it was trump that railed for lower interest rates to overheat the economy just before covid and is the main reason rates had to be raised at break neck pace under biden. Democrats are burdened with stabilizing the situations that republicans have intentionally destabilized. Like right now they will only allow 2 month budget extensions keeping us on the edge of shutdown constantly. That is no way to run a government.

          • aew360@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fuck Lieberman for ruining Obamacare. It could have been so much more

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The Democrats always have a scapegoat to explain why they just couldn’t get [insert leftist goal] done.

              It’s always a lie, or rather, it’s not the truth. The Democrats are neoliberals, and there will always be that one bad democrat who prevented [insert leftist goal], because they don’t want to, but benefit from their voters believing they do.

              • aew360@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                10 months ago

                You can keep your tinfoil hat on but the truth is that Democrats are on average a whole fuck of a lot better. Lieberman was never the type of Democrat you’re thinking of. He’s now trying to get Manchin to run under the No Labels pack so Trump can be king and we can truly see what climate change looks like if we do nothing at all to curb its effects.

                I’ll just be over here telling you all “told you so” when everything you criticize Biden of becomes 10x worse under a true monster like Trump

                • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  What you’re saying has nothing to do with what I’m saying.

                  Yes, the Democrats are better then Trump. How does that invalidate what I said?

                  You can vote for them, and that might make sense. Just do it with your eyes open, because believing in them for anything other then “not being Trump” is a fools errand.

      • aew360@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would argue that the insulin thing was not tiny at all. Biden has been a good President.

          • aew360@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            But Biden can’t do that on his own. He needs Congress, which won’t allow that. The Senate may have a blue majority, but many of those Democrats are too conservative to pass meaningful legislation to address the issues you’re pointing at.

            The U.S. won’t do anything meaningful until the Democrats have an overwhelming advantage and won’t need to compromise with domestic terrorist sympathizers and Christian nationalists… and of course the Liebermans, Sinemas, Testers, and Manchins of the Senate

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The IRA is a big structural change that puts us on a path where we might actually escape global armageddon. It doesn’t get us there, but it puts us on the path and buys us just a little bit of time. And its entire philosophical approach builds constituencies massively, which means the longer it exists, the more it will go into a virtuous cycle. So long as Trump doesn’t get in next cycle and dismantle it from within, it will be incredibly sticky.

        It’s almost certainly the most important bill passed in any of our lifetimes. Not just climate-wise, but legislation-wise. It’s very technical and kind of boring, which makes it not as exciting, but it’s still absolutely huge.

        I don’t give a fuck if people hate Biden for whatever reasons they have. But at least this one piece of major progress, somehow passed through an uncontrolled congress, must not be denied. If we deny it, that’s probably it for our civilization. If we let the achievement be ignored, climate policy will probably be over and the ecosystem will be allowed to die. Any other issue is petty next to total collapse of the global climate and if passing this bill was ALL he could achieve – even ignoring some of the other stuff like filling departments with the most diverse crowd ever in American history – it would still have been a good term for a president. Better-liked presidents have achieved less.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Very little ‘big structural changes’ can happen without Congressional support, and Biden at this point has an actively hostile Congress.

        I can understand why people blame him anyway, but that doesn’t actually make much sense.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Leading this with - I will vote, and I will vote for democrats if it’s what’s needed.

      But the reason I view the (objectively good) things that he’s doing with a grain of salt is that it feels like he’s only doing them because of an impending election.

      Why - when the democrats had control of all 3 branches of government in 2020 and 2021 did they not do anything that mattered?
      They could have unpacked the courts by expanding them. They could have ensured abortion rights. They could have fixed the voting rights act (or implemented something that addresses gerrymandering, racial or otherwise). They could have overturned Medicare Part D. They could have fixed the compromises made when the ACA was written. They could have fixed the Citizens United decision. They could have amended the TCJA so that the tax cuts for the wealthy sunset alongside with the tax cuts for the poor (or even flipped it, so the tax cuts for the poor are made permanent, and the tax cuts for the wealthy sunset, unlike how it was written)!
      They could have done so very, very much. But instead they wrung their hands about Manchin and Sinema, claiming that’s why they were a ‘do-nothing’ congress, and waited to lose the house so they could claim gridlock and return to merely being an alternative to republicans.

      But even the core of that justification is dumb. They could have supported candidates prior to 2020 that weren’t just republicans running on the democrat ballot.

      The issue I think people have with Biden is not that he himself is a bad guy (although he did contribute majorly to the prison-industrial system in the U.S., and championed preventing student loan discharge through bankruptcy when he was a senator).
      It’s that he’s the figurehead of a political party that is more interested in gaming the system than they are in leading the people it is supposed to represent. The only real difference between democrats and republicans in that regard is that republicans deliver on their (often wildly unpopular) policies, and their base respects them for it, even if it means they will die homeless in a polluted gutter.
      The Democratic Party, and by extension, Joe Biden, do not lead, and thusly do not earn respect. Their moves are only the smallest incremental moves, and that does not work at a time when the world and society is redefining itself several times within each generation.

      Man. Sorry. My soapbox is tall today.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I totally get that and I do not like the situation, but when the choice is with or without lube im not going to forego the lube in protest of the situation.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m there, too. It’s just such a gross compromise.

          The crux of the issue is probably structural. If you only get two choices and both are chasing the same sources of money in a system that heavily favors a very small set of investors, then, well… any effort to get votes by distinguishing themselves is ultimately performative.

          In the end, we all wind up getting served shit sandwiches, but one party tells us they don’t want to feed them to us, and the other party has convinced their voters that shit sandwiches are delicious, or at least more offensive to ‘them’ than they are to ‘us.’

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Its just getting worse to. Citizens united really bufu’d our system massively. Republicans may have been usually the worse option but there were individuals who it made sense to vote for. But decade by decade that just disapeared. By 2000 or so (citizens united) it was such that could never vote for one and since then its become literally life and death. Its become a bit like modern media. Something not being totally crappy or massively screwed up is reason to praise.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      But he won’t stop a war between 2 countries that he isn’t in charge of so I can’t see myself voting for him /s

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s the media fueling their usual bull. Bernie put up a vote on the issue and 72 out of 100 said ‘Yes’ to allowing Israel to keep their genocide going. It’s crazy

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t love him. I think he’s taking half measures mostly as an attempt to maintain an economic status quo while pushing for a little bit of social justice (as a treat). It’s a move in a positive direction… but mostly because it’s the best way to be in opposition of the other side.

        I’ll still vote for him, because that’s the only two choices we’re given for the presidential election. I’ll still push for better, and vote more for who I think will actually make a difference at lower levels (state/local races), but I literally can’t vote for who I “love” because it just won’t make any difference.

        Love doesn’t enter into the equation, sadly.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If this works, making overdraft fees $3 is fucking huge.

        Some points, directly from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau:

        • Among households that frequently incurred overdraft/NSF fees, 81% reported difficulty paying a bill at least once in the past year.

        • Among consumers in households charged an overdraft fee in the past year, 43% were surprised by their most recent account overdraft, 35% thought it was possible, and only 22% expected it. Consumers who overdraft infrequently are more likely to be surprised by a fee

        • While just 10% of households with over $175,000 in income were charged an overdraft or an NSF fee in the previous year, the share is three times higher (34%) among households making less than $65,000.

        https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-issues-report-showing-many-americans-are-surprised-by-overdraft-fees/

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is actually a good example: the very concept of overdraft fees is obviously a tax on poverty that should be made illegal as soon as possible.

      Instead, Biden (who’s been known to lie a lot even by politician standards) wants to lower them. In a year. If he’s re-elected.

      Even his aspirational campaign promises are a compromise between the obvious only just course of action and retaining the status quo that enriches his owner donors.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well there has already been things like this that are done in his current term like no surprise billing and capping student loan amounts to the initial principle. I like that he keeps putting out new things rather than waiting for after the election. We have had to much of this, oh its an election year so lets hold off on things which then take time to get going. At least if he does get re-elected it can go into place quickly rather than starting at square one.

    • zeps@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s weird to have parasocial relationships with politicians, it’s how fascists get elected. Always hold them accountable.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Seems to me they get elected when more normal folk fight amongst themselves while their small but rabid following is 100% behind them.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There have been a lot of small improvements to all of our future: start adding them up. Not everything has to start with bombast and braggadocio, or drama, to be significant

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well, you said you don’t get why people don’t love this president. That’s an obvious reason.

          I don’t love that he’s a genocide collaborator. That’s why his Democratic support is so low.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            When has any US president not been friendly towards Isreal, no matter what the IDF is doing?

            • Zorque@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well if everyone else is doing it, it must be okay!

              Tolerance does not equate to love.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                My point is voting for Trump to spite Biden isn’t going to improve the situation with Isreal and its neighbors. If anything it’ll make it even worse.

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well thats two different things and a very broad definition. I, for example, am american and pay my taxes. Im just as much a collaborator therefore unless I stop paying my taxes or supporting the US, no? Now granted I don’t want to support genocide but there are some rather severe consequences for me if I don’t pay my taxes. And is that enough. I mean we are talking genocide. Should I actively fight? That would involve violence on my part. Would I be slipping into being just as bad as the genociders? The idea of pinning the israeli things on him is a step to far for me.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Biden went around Congress to send more weapons to Israel. That’s quite a bit different than paying your taxes.

              • HubertManne@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                He did not go around congress he basically expedited the sales. This really goes back to 911. Many countries pushed back on us for iraq/afghanistan but still did the show of support. Heck they sent their own troops. He could have not done it but it would have repercussions outside of our relationship with Israel. All the same. We paid for the production of the weapons with our taxes. To me railing that biden is a genocide collaborator but then ignore the direct ways they support the genocide, like financially with taxes. Well its being a hypocrite. My support is fine because you know living my nice life is important but his support because of the complex decision making around global relationships in regards to responsibility of his position. Well thats not. Oh and lets ignore that its typical of what presidents and global leaders have done in these situations.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I wouldn’t love living under a dictatorship. Sorry to put my own needs and my family’s needs first.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ah yes, I forgot Biden is personally committing genocide in a country he’s not president of.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re talking about Joe “I’m a Zionist” Biden right? Joe “I did not ask for a ceasefire” Biden?

          You think just cause he’s not personally pulling the trigger of a gun he’s not culpable?

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ah right, good ole “I didn’t get my hands dirty, therefore I’m not culpable”

          He is playing defense for the current Israeli regime, helping keep it propped up not just through aid and arms, but through diplomatic pressures as well. He’s not solely responsible for Netenyahu and his cronies actions… but that doesn’t mean his hands are completely clean, either.

          • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            So you’re ignoring the vote yesterday when 72/100 senators voted to continue supporting the war? How is that bypassing Congress when Congress approved it. And I assume you think Trump will do a better job? Well maybe you’ll get what you’re wishing for and we’ll end up in a Christian dictatorship. I’m sure that’ll be soooooooo much better than what we have now.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s the bully pulpit in action; Democrats lining up behind their President.

              And I assume you think Trump will do a better job?

              I didn’t even mention anything about voting. We’re talking about whether you should love Biden.

              • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Unfortunately our choices are Biden and Trump.
                Biden is not perfect, but when compared to Trump I sure do love him. When compared to Obama or Carter? Not as much.
                But we don’t get a 3rd choice in America, we get to pick whether we like Biden or Trump more, and if you don’t like Biden enough to not vote for him, you better fucking love Trump.
                Is it fair that those are our choices? No.
                But life isn’t fair, so you better figure out which one you hate more.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  That’s irrelevant to the discussion! We were talking about why people don’t love Biden, not about voting.

                  You don’t have to love Biden to vote for him, and as a corollary, you don’t have to love Trump to not vote for Biden. I completely understand people who hate Biden and still choose to vote for him. They don’t believe there’s another choice and I know why they think that way. I am not commenting on how people should vote.

                  What I don’t understand are the freaks that love Biden. What the fuck?