Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agoSophie's choice 70s editionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1575arrow-down126
arrow-up1549arrow-down1imageSophie's choice 70s editionlemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareNeon 🏳️🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️🌈@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·9 months agohow can you get killed by a chihuahua? it nibbles away your toe and you get an infection?!
minus-squareAquaTofana@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down6·9 months agoThey think that they’re making a clever point. Of course larger dogs are inherently more dangerous than tiny dogs. No one is disputing that. But to advocate for the complete wiping out of an entire breed versus mandatory training classes for owners is an insane answer. Make “dangerous breeds” more difficult to get, sure. I agree with that. But I can NOT with the “wipe out all pitbull/rotties/dobermans/GSDs/etc”
minus-squareNakedmole@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 months agoWiping out? Why not just forbid malicious breeding goals, like aggression, bite force and of course torture / unhealthy breeding?
how can you get killed by a chihuahua? it nibbles away your toe and you get an infection?!
They think that they’re making a clever point. Of course larger dogs are inherently more dangerous than tiny dogs. No one is disputing that.
But to advocate for the complete wiping out of an entire breed versus mandatory training classes for owners is an insane answer.
Make “dangerous breeds” more difficult to get, sure. I agree with that. But I can NOT with the “wipe out all pitbull/rotties/dobermans/GSDs/etc”
Wiping out? Why not just forbid malicious breeding goals, like aggression, bite force and of course torture / unhealthy breeding?