• Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and “uBlock”, if you couln’t guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it’s been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can’t find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

      It’s a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

      At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

      So it’s not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Anyone that uses Chrome doesn’t know what a clean non ad infested website looks like so they won’t notice the difference.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          5 days ago

          I actually do a pretty good job of selling it. I tell them that I can set up Firefox so using the Internet is easier. I’m 3/5 so far

        • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Firefox on Android has gotten quite shit as well. It just refuses to load sometimes and won’t open pages until you copy and paste the url in a new tab. Extremly annoying, especially for online payments.

          E: It’s a known issue for a few months now. Check recent reviews on Google Play if you don’t believe me. Fuck me for complaining about having issues I guess.

              • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I have 300 tabs open…

                Amateur. Try over 1,200 with the option to put those not used in a while into an “inactive” group turned off.

                Hmm… Maybe that’s my last phone crashed & burned recently…

          • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            That sounds like maybe you have something else set as default browser and instead of Firefox and that something is messaging it up.

            I use Firefox exclusively and it works everywhere.

            Unless, URLCheck (highly recommended) is somehow fixing this issue. But I don’t remember having it before either.

            • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              No, that issue definitely occurs in Firefox Android sometimes. The tab just gets stuck and does nothing. Has been happening for years, in fact, so it’s not something new. Might be due to some specific settings, but I like my settings and the problem doesn’t pop up too often, so eh.

              Desktop Firefox also gets this sometimes, actually. The tab just doesn’t load until I bash ‘enter’ on the address bar, or create a new tab. Since afaik Firefox uses its Gecko engine on both platforms, the issue could be in the engine rather than the UI.

              • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Honestly I didn’t recall anything where things are stuck.

                Are you sure that the issue on Android isn’t caused by closing a link and the app opening Firefox in its context?

                If this is such a percentage issue I’d there big open about it?

                • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  It happens within Firefox, without rhyme or reason that I could discern. I think it’s more common if I open a link from another app, then switch away from Firefox while the page loads in the background; or when returning to FF and it tries to reload a previously suspended tab. Firefox is allowed to load stuff on my phone in the background even when battery saving is on (which it always is), but I guess FF might get into a fight with the system over available memory, with the system killing one of FF’s processes/threads. Wouldn’t explain it happening on the desktop, though.

                  If this is such a percentage issue I’d there big open about it?

                  It happens pretty rarely for me, and I have no idea how it could be reproduced. So, I already barely ever open issues (by principle), and certainly won’t report this. Idk about others — wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a bug about this among the many thousands of issues that Mozilla has.

            • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Firefox is the only browser I have installed and it’s been my default for years.

              It’s a known issue. It’s been reported on google play but I guess they haven’t fixed it yet.

    • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, you don’t need to be a genius to imagine a concrete site without shit. Chrome users apparently love advertisements, trackers, pop-up windows and other similar things. Well, who are we to disagree?

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not true. UBlock Origin Lite works just fine. They even recently added the ability to use content scripts so there is almost no difference between it and the original UBlock. Manifest 3 has had and still has some challenges, but you’re being so hyperbolic that I can’t take anything people like you say seriously. Might as well say… “I hate Chrome so much that I’ll make up random lies to prove how bad it is!”

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          5 days ago

          First, I don’t care if they agree with me or not. It is an open source project. They said from they never intended to try to make a 1:1 extension with UBO. They clearly lay out the positives of MV3 as well, and the scripts permission feature is a relatively new addition. You or anyone can contribute or fork it you want to add something.

          I have spent enough time working on MV3 to know Chromium has solved a lot of the challenges. If you want to have a technical discussion about the APIs and differences or how you might do something with MV3, then let’s have the discussion. I never tried to claim MV3 is perfect.

          I just have little patience for essentially non-technical cultists who go around spreading misinformation while acting like they know way more than they do. Prove it then… 99% of people like you never actually want to have a real technical discussion, because you spread your opinions based on feelings and not facts.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Prove it then… 99% of people like you never actually want to have a real technical discussion, because you spread your opinions based on feelings and not facts.

            This is extremely funny that you’re trying to insult me, based on your feelings and not facts.

            My only participation in this thread was that UBO Lite creator disagrees with you, which he publicly stated, but you felt… Offended? (No idea) - and decided to insult me rather than to deal with facts.

            There is a word for people like you.

            Troll.

            • John Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              This is extremely funny that you’re trying to insult me, based on your feelings and not facts.

              My only participation in this thread was that UBO Lite creator disagrees with you, which he publicly stated, but you felt… Offended? (No idea) - and decided to insult me rather than to deal with facts.

              There is a word for people like you.

              Troll.

              Citing gorhill’s disclaimer that uBOL isn’t a 1:1 clone of uBO doesn’t prove Chrome is “ad-infested”—it conflates advanced power-user filtering with everyday ad blocking. Many limitation were Firefox-exclusive APIs that Chrome MV2 never supported in the first place.

              Under the hood, standard filter lists compile directly into native C++ evaluation via declarativeNetRequest, while cosmetic element hiding and anti-adblock defusers run through the scripting and userScripts APIs. Furthermore, synchronous webRequestBlocking is still built into the Chromium engine for policy installs. Pointing out the architectural reality of how these APIs actually execute isn’t trolling; it’s addressing technical mechanics rather than hyperbole.

              • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Pointing out the architectural reality of how these APIs actually execute isn’t trolling

                Cool. Except that you didn’t do that before. You’re doing that now, after the fact.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    company which makes most of it’s revenue from advertising fucks with their browser’s ability to remove ads. Go figure!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The irony is that Chrome’s rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft’s “embrace, extend, extinguish” tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string.

        But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror.

        Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla’s development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable.

        • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think it’s the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I’m not sure where it can go.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think I’ll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot.

    • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      4 days ago

      Most people I know simply don’t care. They will use it because it’s convenient and they don’t care about the privacy dangers. I can’t comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

      • REDACTED
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        They will use it because it’s convenient

        Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I’ve experienced

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think most people who don’t know better just think that’s “the internet” and that it’s the same no matter how you access it. The whole concept of browsers and extensions is just not in the realm of concern.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ve seen some shift among the tech illiterate in my immediate vicinity, but most are still in the “I got nothing to hide” category of clueless twits.

        • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          Funnily enough my two kids have expressed hatred of AI. It’s mainly people around my age or higher that can’t let any sort of convenience go even if shown the dangers.

          Otherwise I’m just “scaremongering”.

            • Hazor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              My 14yo hates the current AI but says most peers are using it and can’t understand how to write an essay or such without it.

              I think only some of the kids are alright. Many, if not most, are in trouble.

        • OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          The problem is that everyone’s internet experience is very different these days. Your friends might be boring and actually have nothing in their lives that need compartmentalized/obfuscated. It’s unlikely but not impossible.

          The easiest way to demonstrate the problem would be when they show you something on an unprotected device you note the ads and give them shit for it. Those ads are likely targeted, and so your jabs would be targeted and personal too. Then point out that those ads are tied to THEM. Just ask every time, “have you been looking at X? Gross dude.” It doesn’t matter what it is. It’s the point that they are uncomfortable with your guess and it’s an opening to explain that, yeah it’s not just those ads buddy.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Given how long ago this was announced, anybody still using Chrome doesn’t care.

      • Carl@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, pretty much this. In regards to tech, the fediverse often suffers from the average familiarity problem:

        The average user barely even knows how to check their email.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 days ago

          My empathy for this view dies on shit that impacts you every single day of your life. At that point it’s not a bit of information you just haven’t needed yet - it’s willful ignorance that I’m not giving you a pass on.

          How long do I need to watch people crap themselves before I’m allowed to demand they learn to use a toilet?

        • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Every community on the internet full of computer nerds suffers this problem. It’s not exclusive to here.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Or they just installed uBlock Origin Lite, which still works for most things.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      A thin layer of chromium on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I used to work in manufacturing and we made a sort of tube socket that was cadmium plated on the outside and chrome plated on the inside.

          I wonder how many people got cancer plating those things. Ironically, all of the platers were in California because it was banned for new plating centers in most other states.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Chromium is the browser that I open a few times a year for websites that don’t support Firefox. A few may be a gross over estimate.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s really seldom, but a few years back there was a government website that only worked with chrome or edge that I had to use. I had one the other night and found a work around. It’s a rare occurrence, and usually I can avoid it, but sometimes I have to just suck it up, do the deed, and bail.

          • brsrklf@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I don’t design web apps but I’ve heard from some that do that firefox occasionally has problems with them, because it relies a lot on caching (actually they used the term “aggressive caching”, with a few extra choice words).

            Anyway, usually not a problem. I use edge only for work since it’s the default browser and I barely do any actual browsing with it, mostly light app clients. On my own devices, it’s been firefox only for years.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it’s basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

    • Magnum, P.I.
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Doesn’t this just track the shit out of you? Does it also click malicious ad banners?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well, it anonymizes you by “faking” the tracking. I would hope it takes steps to sandbox the ads.

        • Magnum, P.I.
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What does it fake about the tracking? The tracking is very real and the tool is clicking every tracking link available on the site like its life depends on it

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Step 2: install Privacy Badger

        And Facebook Container is another useful one.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t, privacy badge and adnauseam will interfere eachothers and as result you will get worst results, you are better off using a DNS level adblocker (eg: Pihole or NextDNS if you don’t/can’t self host) alongside uBlock/adnauseam

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            They overlap; Ublock does it through lists, and badger does it through heuristics.

            Running just badger, it can miss things, if you can use both, you get all the lists and heuristics, but they’re probalby not both necessary

            • mschae@discuss.mschae23.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s best not to use multiple ad blockers at the same time. They’ll conflict with each other and you’ll be worse off. uBO alone is probably enough.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I’ve used them both for years and never noticed any sort of conflict, but I’ve heard that potential conflict mentioned several times with no clarification

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Brave is kinda shady with their whole cryptocurrency thing, Helium seems fine but it’s still based on Chromium. I’ve been recommending people check out Librewolf

      • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        Simple Firefox is perfectly fine.

        Ungoogled Chromium is my standby for the instances when a Blink browser is needed, though it’s not entirely simple to set up.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Librewolf doesn’t do anything that Firefox can’t do with extensions + tweaking settings, but it’s nice to not have to install all the extensions

        • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah that’s why I’m debating brave. Firefox is good to especially after the huge engine overhaul a few years ago.

      • Tiral@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve been on brave for a few years but switched to Firefox because it’s a different base. I don’t think it’s necessary better, but if that’s the way the wind is blowing on chromium browsers the it’s the best option.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or better yet LibreWolf

        I cannot count how many things I had to change in settings to get the browser to just work right, I mean I appreciate them locking everything down to the nth degree but… damn. Finally switched to waterfox, the out of the box experience is a lot friendlier.

        • SquareScarletCougar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I get the frustration. It could have a tutorial / wizard to make it easier to set and understand.

          If some parts are not loading, check the top left of the address bar for some icons, by default LibreWolf blocks canvas and anything that can identify you, and you have to press on them to allow them to render the elements.

          Security unfortunately implies more inconvenience, which is what companies like Google love, but if it was a lot friendlier it would probably be less safe.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I tried LibreWolf for a little while, but too many sites just wouldn’t load at all with it, so I went back to Firefox.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      First time hearing of Helium, thanks for mentioning. Sounds interesting, will be keeping an eye on it.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m using Zen now. it took me a while while to get the hang of the UI. But once I did I found it to be very nice to have those spaces that I can organize for different tasks.

        • iamnotme@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve used Zen for about 9 months, possibly more, and have had a largely positive experience.

          It has crashed a few times recently for no obvious reason but not enough to bother me. There’s probably new release version again even though I updated my Linux instance a couple of weeks ago.

  • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 days ago

    Damn it.

    Gotta use chrome at work.

    Firefox “isn’t secure and isn’t supported” - my it director

  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work

        • genzboomer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I remember! 2.0 to 3.0 switch wherethe GUI slowed down dramatically. 2.0 felt like driving a sports-car.

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think it was still called Phoenix when I originally dropped it. Before it got renamed Firefox. Came back around last year after adblock stuff in chrome finally chased me away.

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don’t think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.

        • narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          In my experience, there was a period when Firefox crashed all over the place, especially under heavy load. Tabs shared the same process back then, one tab could take down whole the browser session when crashed. I vividly remember how it felt so silky when i switched to chrome. Now I am back to Firefox since 3 years. Firefox is the sexier now with all the shiny addons

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah Firefox was kind of a hog around 2013. I have a netbook that I’ve kept around since like 2014 and I remember when I first got it, it couldn’t really run Firefox. Firefox would freeze up and crash. Funily enough today Firefox runs better on that 2014 netbook than chrome does.

              I also had a high end gaming PC at the time and Firefox always ran fine as long as you had the reaources to run it.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I switched to Chrome back then because it ran tabs in separate processes. A tab crashing in Firefox would take the whole browser down.

        The final straw for me was the plugins. Flash, Java, Acrobat, etc. Chrome kept them up to date for you. Firefox made you just through hoops, which eventually lead to a rogue site injecting crap onto my machine which took me a day to clean up. Plugins are pretty much dead now, but back then you needed them for half the web to work.

        Chrome really was a great browser back then (and MS were still in the “what’s wrong with Internet Explorer?” era), and it’s a shame that they’re now working so hard to fuck it up again.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Chrome did a bunch of things absolutely wonderfully in the beginning. Fast JavaScript engine, removed title bar (tabs on top), simple settings page, sandboxed tabs, and they made some of the functionality of the most popular Firefox extensions the default (such as the downloads bar, instead of a separate window).

          It was basically a pre-modded Firefox, but supercharged. Now it’s corporate slop.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It was back before enshittification of the internet, when things were better. Was just big and clunky, chrome came along and ran very fast, until last few years, they swapped places.