You must log in or register to comment.
You gotta understand Justin did the bulk of that damage against the Broncos and Commanders.
Tyson did it against checks notes the Raiders, Chargers, and Panthers.
Oh I didn’t realize Washington was a juggernaut
theyre better than the Chargers and Panthers
Your point is so bad I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make. You just listed five equally shitty teams and acted like there was a difference between them.
We basically have 2 backup QB’s
Both have two lost fumbles. Bagent has one more rushing td than fields. The sacks are 25 to 5. Fields has 130 more rushing yards.
…aaaaand that should complete our comparison of our first round, in his third year, potential franchise qb to our rookie udfa from a d2 school in his first four starts.
Sure, if you remove all context to the stats and look only at the numbers. Having Teven Jenkins on the line is a massive benefit to any QB - he’s been that good.
For me, Fields gets until the end of the season. Poles doesn’t have to decide before then - why should we?
Lucky for us we will get to see how he does with teven back in. He should also have Khalil Herbert back. Don’t worry though, if he plays poorly I can already hear the excuses of ‘well he had to play the better defenses’. I Hope he plays well but I’m not going to live in denial if he continues to have the same struggles he’s had for the past 2.5 years.
And what’s your point? Bagent looks much worse than Fields has and his best game is still the 3 yards a pass game. Fields has two 4 TD games this season, and in his last 2 full starts. Fields has been bad for sure passing the ball, but Bagent hasn’t looked close to an NFL starting QB.
My point is that you guys don’t seem to understand that it’s not good when you’re having to microanalyze differences bw the guy you hope is your franchise qb and a rookie d2 udfa.
That has no bearing on anything at this point. Most people don’t care where any player went college, once they make a team.
So the stats back up ‘back up’ status. Moving on.
Fields productivity comes in his 3rd year in the league. While these are Bagent’s first 4 games after playing in D2.
Maybe Fields and Bagent are both backups?
Comparing third year Fields from Ohio State to first 4 games Bagent making the jump from D2.
Yea man, that’s where they came from and where they are at. Anyone with two eyes should be able to see that Fields is clearly the better and more talented QB. They should also see that he hasn’t been good enough either.
The Fields v. Bagent nonsense is so tiresome.
I don’t know if he’s the better QB right now. I actually think Bagent does a better job getting the offense into a rhythm. But Fields clearly has a much MUCH higher ceiling than Bagent does. Fields biggest issue since he came into the league was hitting the layup throws. He hasn’t made much progress in that area so far. I also think that the Bears offense is still lacking another legitimate playmaker. You have to have at least two on your team or you’re not going anywhere. We have one.
Bears PPG in Fields full games: 23; Bagent: 19
Total offensive YPG in Fields full games: 334.4; Bagent: 320.3
Third down conversion pct in Fields full games: 40%; Bagent: 48.1%
There might be a slightly better “rhythm” but it’s a worse offense overall.
It’s crazy that they’ve now started almost the same amount of games this year.