• CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      202
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s catch and release so they let them go afterwards where they found them. Horseshoe crab blood is an essential biomedical tool that’s saved countless lives.

        • CluckN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          135
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s an anticoagulant and can detect the smallest traces of endotoxins in medicine. I’m sure I’m missing some details but there are some great medical journals that detail the process and help explain why it’s $60,000 a gallon.

          • Mercival@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            47
            ·
            11 months ago

            It is not an anticoagulant, quite the opposite actually. The blood (limulus amoebocyte lysate) will coagulate at the slightest hint of gram-negative bacteria and their endotoxins.

            It’s most likely a defense mechanism against bacterial infections.

            It’s widely used in medicine to check for bacterial contamination of injectable pharmaceuticals.

            • Rubanski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Discoveries like this always makes me wonder, who had the idea to try it and why

            • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Woah. Are horseshoe crabs like other crustaceans in that they eat pretty much anything including/mostly detritus?

              If thats the case, than how would it be beneficial to have blood that coagulates so easily?

              Wouldn’t every meal lead to a crab version of a stroke?

              • Mercival@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                Horseshoe crabs are not crusteceans, they are early chelicerates.

                They have an open circulatory system, where the blood (heamolymph) freely spills out of the arteries into surrounding tissues, so a small clot probably wouldn’t cause issues. Think of it like a cyst, sometimes if an infection can’t be removed by the immune system, your body will just enclose it in a capsule, so it can’t spread.

                  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Well, he asked if they are like other crustaceans, so the answer is they are not crustaceans so no, they are not like others.

          • Zron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Where can someone find these horseshoe crabs?

            And are they able to be bred in captivity?

            Pls respond fast, I’m already driving to home depot to buy the largest above ground pool they have.

        • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          11 months ago

          The blood contains a coagulent which clots in the presence of bacterial toxins. It is extracted and used to ensure that medical equipent and stuff such as vaccines are sterile and safe.

        • prayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The main use is to detect how much endotoxins (proteins that cause our immune system to react) are present in a sample. This is important because we often use bacteria/fungus/yeast to produce medicine and then remove the microorganism from that medicine. This checks for anything left behind in that process, far more sensitive than any other test or machine can do.

          If it wasn’t for horseshoe crab blood, creating medicine that is safe for injection would be a lot harder and potentially more dangerous.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Wonder why we can’t just make the coagulant ourselves. Or maybe we can but milking crabs is still cheaper.

            • prayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              My guess without checking would be regulatory. The FDA doesn’t want to approve an alternative to an already working method unless it can be shown to truly be an alternative. That testing is lengthy and expensive.

            • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not a chemical compound, the active component is an amebocyte. Same reason we can’t just make red blood cells and need other humans to donate them.

              There have been other attempts at making synthetic coagulants without broad success. The thing that seems to be the most effective at minimizing the horseshoe crab burden is using machines to do the detection and cut down on the amount of LAL needed vs running the test visually.

    • Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Here’s a description of the bleeding process:

      https://www.horseshoecrab.org/med/bestpractices.html

      It’s specifically non-fatal:

      Bleeding horseshoe crabs to death is not an acceptable practice in the U.S.

      The volume of blood taken is actually quite small, as most of the material in the collection jars is anticoagulant.

      It may look uncomfortable to us humans, but keep in mind that horseshoe crabs are not human. What’s normal for the spider is chaos for the fly. Granted, it would be kinda weird to be hoisted from your home by a giant ape and forced into a blood drive. It’s done as gently as possible though.

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hmm. Assuming that the production was actually harmless, what’s the difference between wearing a wool sweater made from excess animal production of wool and using a vaccine made from excess animal blood?

              • bstix@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yes donors voluntarily give up a pint of blood every month, because it replenishes.

              • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Vegans can receive transfusions because I believe it’s down to “consent”. Humans consent to the blood draw. Crabs do not.

                So vegans shouldn’t be taking any medicine or vaccines that have had blood crab blood used in their manufacture.

                I have discovered the solution to the vegan problem! Tell all vegans about medicine being made using animal blood and they will die out faster than their B12 & iron deficiency does at the moment!

                Patent Pending

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        Still, I was disappointed to find that a large percentage of released crabs die anyway. Can’t find the number, but it’s significant. 1/3rd?

        • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Afair estimates put the portion of dead crabs between 10 and 30%. Some might also be unable to reproduce due to the bleeding.

          • Mercival@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sadly a lot of the companies harvesting them will just kill and sell them for bait anyways.

            Of those that are released, about a third die. Not to say about the decrease in overall fitness, which can lead to them falling prey more easily.

            It’s obviously a traumatic experience for the animal in the best case scenario and that is going to reflect on their ability to survive in the wild.

        • Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, I don’t mean the “blood donation” being normal. The person I was responding to asked why they were being drained “this way”. I assumed they were concerned about the folded-over positioning of the crab.

          Also, counter argument (in good fun): plenty of animals get their blood drained regularly in nature. Mosquitos, ticks, leaches, and vampire bats are a few examples of things that drain blood from others. Maybe the crabs see us as giant pests?

          Defo not the best arrangement for the crabs though. As others pointed out to me, apparently despite the optimistic wording in the link I shared the process is still fatal to some. I’m glad we’re working on alternatives.

      • voluble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thanks for the link and info.

        Not a reply directly to you, but to contrast the dominant view in the thread - what would it matter if even 100% of the crabs died? Sustainability considerations aside - a crab died for my delicious salad, who cares if they die for a life saving vaccine? Who cares if it’s painful and disorienting for the crab, it’s a crab. As humans, why should we prioritize crab life and well-being over our own?

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because we HAVE to kill a crab to eat it, we shouldnt be killing or harming other animals unless we “need” to. If theres a way to harvest blood without killing the animal, that is the ethically cleanest option. I do think we should prioritize helping our own species over others, but that doesnt mean ignoring the suffering or harm of other species

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Highest chance of survival/low stress

      Edit: many do die still. I don’t want to say it’s safe, just safer

    • Darken@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s how blueberry is made Freeze some of this add some structure, let it set, then put it on trees

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because we as a species have decided its okay to torture others for personal gain

      • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is a necessary evil to save many many human lives. Alternatives are being worked on, but this isn’t just for money or food, it’s for lifesaving medicine.