• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In order to update these spreadsheets and email some fuckers, society must allow for 200lbs of meat to be moved fifty miles per day. Because someone has to stare at me. The meat.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      society must allow for 200lbs of meat to be moved fifty miles per day

      And in the US, said transportation will likely make even less sense (in terms of weight, cost, and health/comfort).

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, you put 200 lb of meat into a 2,000 metal box with climate control, a couch, and sound system, then burn 1-3 gallons of gasoline.

        This is required for efficient spreadsheets.

        • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          2,000Lbs is a low estimate. 2,500Lbs assumes they drive a subcompact, 4,100Lbs is the current average weight (and 2004 was already at 4K so I’m not sure if this statistic counts SUVs/trucks or not). Even Kei cars are 1500-2500Lbs (ICE versions being lighter, though there are smaller and lighter cars including 2-person EVs that are under 1K*.

          I would also add the time spent in a car (particularly in slow/jammed traffic) is also sedentary time (which an office job also likely is) and thus a health issue. So some people buy gym memberships which they must also drive to. If they even have the time/money/energy.

          Also lots of bad things to be said about roads(/stroads) and parking lots etc. But the short of it is, they aren’t places hospitable for living. Particularly on a hot day.


          *=Though this lower-size vehicle may be legally classified as something else, such a a “covered motorcycle”/autocycle (or from what I’m seeing, some other close-enough category) which may be an issue or a boon with laws, and may even depend on local laws.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In my defense it was a Mazda 3.

            These days it’s all mainly remote work at a standing desk. I have Big Desk Energy.

            Edit: on cold days I work in the snuggle zone

            • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              In my defense it was a Mazda 3.

              From the collective consciousness I pulled the 2004 Toyota Corolla weighing in at 2,502 to 2,590 lbs. Because certainly there’s no other way I would guess The the most average car so on-the-nose. And I have seen the videos about the Honda Insight being good for gas mileage (even back in 1999, it’s a hybrid).

              I guess actual price, availability, perception, mantenence etc. molds it for most people though.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            4,100Lbs is the current average weight (and 2004 was already at 4K so I’m not sure if this statistic counts SUVs/trucks or not)

            CAFE standards required proportionally greater economy improvements in compact cars than in medium and large vehicles. Rather than attempt to meet those standards, manufacturers just stopped producing their smallest cars.

            Fuel economy has worsened, because the average car on the road is bigger and heavier now than 30 years ago.

  • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A higher up at my company recently derisively said one of the major reasons people didn’t want to return to office was because they saved money working from home… as if that’s a ridiculous reason. Some of these executives are so out of touch with their inflated salaries.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yet the same douchebag will cut costs in the company at every turn. And is probably cheap as fuck in personal budgeting. These people need to fuck right the hell off.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is what people mean when they say “people don’t work as hard from home” are talking about. Having a little extra spending money makes you not worry as much about appeasing your boss.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really means the bosses can’t preside over a culture of fear quite so well if people aren’t cowering outside their offices seeking their attention. They like to be the centre of attention and work being done remotely makes them feel just as meaningless as the rank and file workers.

    • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are more productive at home. We know this. It works and has worked. These companies that refuse to acknowledge it will continue to destroy themselves.

      • zik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Companies that adapt to remote work will have access to better workers who can afford to be choosey about jobs. And since remote workers concentrate better and work longer hours they’re even more productive.

        Companies which force workers to come into the office will languish and become less profitable and they won’t even know why.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Expect a lot of the usual punching-down in response to this. “Carpool. Brown bag your lunch.” and so on.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How to save money when working in-person:

      1. Instead of buying lunch, just steal it.
      2. Dont go drinking with your coworkers. Day drink so you’re too drunk when you drive home.
      3. Make your own alcohol under your desk.
      4. Save money that you’ll be forced to spend at the tiddy bar by oogling Nancy, the 60 yo HR gal with the nice taa taas.
      5. Bike to work.
      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bike to work.

        I love how this is framed as being just as silly as making alcohol under your desk. Our cities fucking suck.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excellent suggestions! Biking also gives you many opportunities to spot some road kill pizza for those moral-boosting pizza parties!

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you keep a plastic bottle under your desk you can save money by reusing last night’s alcohol.

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do love my bike commute, though. Saves me five dollars on bus fare and gets some exercise in. ❤️ also guilt free lunch.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is suggesting making your own lunch a “bad” thing though? I’ve been doing it for years to save money and eat better. Food is absolutely on “us” I would be eating whether I’m home or at work, but then again I’m a US born Stockholm syndrome slavelord that’s just used to the shit system we have here. Do other countries require their companies to pay for lunches?

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s nice is that when you work from home, you have your whole kitchen at your disposal to make your lunch. As opposed to needing to plan ahead while wasting part of your day on a commute.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Suggesting it at an appropriate time or place is fine, such as a frugality community.

        Suggesting it in response to the fact that working in an office is significantly more expensive compared to working from home is not appropriate.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This doesn’t include the opportunity costs of not being at home. Since you’re not at home, you can’t tidy up for a few minutes during a break. You can’t prepare a meal for dinner that takes a long time. You can’t run a quick errand in the middle of the day without eating up “sick” time. You need to provide childcare for kids after school.

    If they want me in an office they need a good goddamn reason to do one of the most dangerous things I do all day - driving - and to pay me for all the things I’m missing out on. Not just for the commute, but a cleaning service, child care, and takeout for dinner.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah when I’ve been allowed to work from home I’ve either done chores or talked to my wife during breaks. And I’ve been more comfortable doing the things that make me more effective in my work that bosses don’t like like listening to books during repetitive work

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You need to provide childcare for kids after school.

      My boss’s boss is the type to say you need to have adequate child care even if you’re working from home so as to be undisturbed the same as if you were in the office. Luckily I had a migraine when he said it or I would have said something that would have gotten me fired.

      • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It depends on circumstances. We have two children, one is four and a half, the other is 9 months old. My wife and I both work from home (well my wife will be, she’s still on maternity leave with our baby). We have to have daycare, we’d personally go nuts otherwise. So I never factor in daycare in my analysis, it’s a sunk cost for me, at the moment. But even disregarding that, I worked out what it really cost me in time, wear and tear on my vehicles, additional insurance, fuel, parking, lunch, etc, and I came out to about $40k.

  • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    my first reaction was that’s a rediculous amount, but its actually not that far fetched. my commute cost is $17 per day (AUD) which is pretty much half that. all it takes is a cheap lunch and a coffee to meet that total (obviously something you can avoid most days but you won’t everyday because “TeAm BoNdiNg” requires spending money to eat with people you don’t like

    • CreateProblems@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work in the US but at my company, team lunch is always paid for. Not only the food, but the time we eat is paid time (for hourly employees.) Mandatory “fun” should be on the clock and paid for by the company.

      Definitely not the case for every company here, of course. But personally, I’d refuse to attend if the company weren’t paying for it.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The only argument I really have much sympathy for is the time/gas expenses. Food is totally on “us.” Buying food too expensive every day? Meal prep on the weekends. I never buy food at work and if I were home I’d be eating the same thing as I am at work so it’s not an extra cost.

      That said I’m 100% not against having employers cover food costs lol

      • dangblingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you have kids? Do you have a live-in maid? Do you spend all day Sunday doing meal prep for the week? People are working longer hours, commuting more, and have less time. I’m all for personal accountability, but man, there’s only so many hours in a day. Imagine you had an emergency on a Sunday night. No lunch for the week?

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t have kids or a maid, but I only need 2 hours to make what I would be eating for lunch. If you can’t find 2 hours to make food then I guess you have to buy it, but that fact would remain whether you’re at work or not.

      • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        “If people don’t buy lunch the economy will suffer!”

        Okay so have employers cover the cost of food. $15 per meal.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s about 246 working days (assuming you take up to 3 weeks a year off for sick/vacation, I know may be high for some people). At $31/day that’s $7,600. Use an average of 32% on taxes and you’d have to give a person at least an $11,200 raise to offset that savings…. And companies are still wondering why people are hesitant to come back?

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember as a kid going over a friend’s house and seeing the quarters lined up on the table. His parents were both nurses and had to pay to park at the hospital. I don’t remember the amount at the time, just being in awe at how much they spent just to park where they worked.

    They usually worked on different schedules too, so that’s separate parking.

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the big Boston hospitals tried to recruit me for their transplant team once. They wanted to pay me $15,000/year LESS for the privilege of commuting into Boston five days a week and paying for my own parking. Fuck that noise. I’ll stay at my little community hospital, thanks. Prestige ain’t gonna pay my mortgage.

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The big university hospital that I work at charges $200 a month for employee parking, including for the people working near minimum wage.

        Doctors park free in designated spots that are closer than patient parking.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ding ding ding We have a winner! How did you know? 😑

          Of course, at the rate they’re consolidating, we’re all gonna be working for MGH soon enough.

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Boston does have the MBTA.

            Although hospitals run 24/7, and the T doesn’t. And even when it’s running, sometimes it isn’t, because there’s a train broken down. Or on fire. Or both.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly.

    3.25$ X 2 for the metro fare. Approx 5$ for a cup of coffee 25-30$ for lunch. A few bucks more on maybe a drink or a snack.

    This adds up.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people at the top like that, because they have the disposable income to dress better than the office drones.

        • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bestow hope you filthy peasants, casual Friday.

          However it must still be BUSINESS CASUAL. We can’t have the scum coming in with a hoodie or comfortable clothing.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My clothes from before the pandemic still fit at least. But I had to buy new socks because the elastics were all dried up.

      • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        In most of the US that’s a crazy amount to spend on lunch, but this hypothetical also included public transit so we’re not talking about most of the US

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s in CAD. Our dollar isn’t as strong as the EUR. Also everything is more expensive in Canada.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Spending $30 on lunch in Canada is still absurd. The food court near where I work:

          $15 for iranian meat + rice (i forget what it’s called sorry, best option by far though)

          $12 for a japadog

          $8 for two slices of pizza

          Are you going to earls or some shit for lunch?

      • e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just a fast food hamburger and fries is $9-something where I live. The yellow curry at my favorite Thai restaurant is $12-something, plus a tip. Add a soda to either one and it’s another $2-3.

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s similar here. I could scrimp and get by for a little less but it is easy to spend $10-15 on lunch these days.

          But at least it’s less healthy. /s

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea 25-30 is a sit down meal somewhere, in reality most office drones are picking up something quick from fast food or a convenience store for >$15 a day.

        Still a waste of money though

        • jasondj@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’d be surprised. I was busy at work one day and starving. Almost doordashed a burrito and chips from Chipotle till I saw it’d be almost $25 before tip.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would be surprised but you said DoorDash, that adds like 40% after you count in DoorDash fees, the raise in price from the restaurant trying to get their fees back, plus the tip.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, there’s no reason someone needs to purchase coffee and lunch when working in an office. Both can be easily packed from home.

      Although many workers have to commute by car, which would offset a portion of those savings.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess this is going to depend heavily on the kind of job you have.

      My workplace provides coffee of the highest quality, breakfast, snacks and all kinds of drinks. I also get access to ~$10 per day to spend on lunch - which to be fair doesn’t really cover the whole cost any more - but still, it helps. I also bike to work, so there’s not really any cost there to speak of.

      Depending on how creatively you decide to do your accounting, I arguably gain from going to the office. Then again, I could spend 5 days at home if I wanted without any problems. I’m choosing to go in anyways though

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The last time I was in an office regularly they gave us a free buffet lunch every day. Then we got bought by a big company and it turned into soup and salad. Then we got sandwiches. Then they stopped it entirely. Then I quit.

  • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the clock from the moment I leave the driveway and until my commute home. Pay mileage too. Ok to stipulate a reasonable limit on this, of course. Or, you know, let people work from home.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When we got called back to the office at my last job, it cost me about $65 per day to go to work. There was gas of course, but then there were tolls both ways, parking fees, and lunch. It was ridiculous. $10 both ways in tolls, $22 parking $15+ for lunch, plus gas. Before the pandemic there had been an employee shuttle that I used to negate all of those fees, but it wasn’t available after the pandemic. I ended up finding another job and quitting when they wouldn’t entertain letting me stay remote. The stupidest part was that I would commute an hour both ways (because of traffic), and spend all that money, just to sit at a desk by myself and teleconference with my team who was in a different state. The entire team folded a few months after I left since their other two key engineers left too.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the premise, but this rub me the wrong way:

    “$16 on lunch, $13 on breakfast and coffee.”

    It sounds like entitlement if you think someone should be paying for something you already do at home (eat), but choose to do it in the most expensive way possible.

    Make food and coffee at home and bring it to work. And if you’re already buying expensive shop meals to eat at home, why complain about spending that outrageous amount of money when you’re outside the home?

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel this has to be pointed out to young people: it used to be possible to eat out every day, go to the movies, drink in a bar after work, see a live band on the weekend, and still buy a home and save for the future. This was possible in major cities around the country. This was taken from you.

      It is not outrageous for single people living in a city to buy food outside the house. I believe prices have clearly skyrocketed because fewer people know how to make their own food. In the 50s everyone had grown up during the depression, so if something was even a little expensive you made it yourself.

      P.S. Not only did many workplaces provide free or discounted cafeterias to eat in, they paid you during your lunch hour! That’s where the phrase " working 9:00 to 5:00" comes from.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why so many apartments have kitchens that look like they were recent ideas squeezed into the space, or tiny “kitchenettes”.

        Reading older literature I’ve noticed how in older books the main character’s living arrangements often just doesn’t have any place to prepare or store food. They’ll reference street carts, open markets, pubs, etc as where they get food from. Or maybe a meal included with the rent in a boarding house.

        Medieval peasants in pre-industrial Europe expected their employer to provide at least one, if not two meals during work. Three during long hours, like harvest season.

    • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      that is the entire point of the commercial real estate excuse: that was your labor and money that was supporting it not the bosses.

      the bosses don’t care about commercial real estate, either. They care about being able to use their status to bully people in person in front of others.

      it is a garbage barge with lipstick on the front.

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the bosses don’t care about commercial real estate, either.

        That depends on how high up you go, the upper bosses certainly do care about real estate. There’s a reason that all of the leases are expiring and everyone is being required to come in at the same time.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My work pays for my lunch, it’s how it should be. I’m here for them, if I wasn’t I’d eat at home.

    • Jessvj93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect people are not spending as much on nonessentials and businesses are seeing this as their workplaces being empty and not spending. But something tells me it’s a nationwide thing, people are thinking twice due to inflation and I doubt bringing people back is gonna make them want to spend money the way they used to. My claim is based on layoffs and stocking issues.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I totally agree. There’s no reason anyone needs to consistently purchase breakfast and lunch if they work in an office.

      If you don’t do it at home, why would you do it at the office?

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can make food at home as a part of your lunch break. If you make food and bring it in, you need to spend extra non paid time to do that.

        • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair to say for lunch. Not for breakfast though, unless one makes the argument there should also be a breakfast break.

          Regardless, with the existing status quo it’s not a good financial decision to eat out for breakfast and lunch everyday.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The status quo shouldn’t mean that you are forced to spend time outside of work time preparing for work time. Unless they want to pay for that time, or your lunch.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s about what a monthly train pass to London costs my wife.

      Who is, I cannot stress this enough, a student.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t even include the time to prepare and commute, just the monetary cost.

      If they paid overtime to commute it would be even more.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How much was electricity when you were working at home? Air conditioning? Are you buying more alcohol? If you are complaining that you are buying lunch more thats your problem… you can pack a cooler and bring that shit to work.

    • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s all personal. But for me I only run the air conditioner for 3 months and normally not every day. I also run the heat for four. But all that plus electricity costs less than gas, tolls , car payment and car maintenance.

      • PatFusty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think its all relative and depends on where you live. If you live in the south you can probably expect to pay for AC all day, probably 6-8 months of the year. As for car related, this is also all relative. If you have a car and it isnt used much for 15 months then I would expect the car to not start when you try.