Edit: this is meant to be a shitpost. I don’t care about your favorite series/universe. You do you.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I wanted to try Star Trek recently, but found out it’s like 1000 episodes and 15 movies, so it might take a while. Though I’ve heard not everything is worth watching.

    Can anyone from Star Trek’s fan base provide some more insights on which shows can be safely skipped, if any?

    As for watch order, I’m gonna go with release date order, unless there are any special circumstances.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Though I’ve heard not everything is worth watching.

      You heard wrong 😎

      Seriously, if you ask ten Trekkies you’ll get twelve opinions on what’s good, what isn’t, and why. My best advice is to try everything, skip a few seasons ahead if a show is not resonating at first, and if it still isn’t hitting the mark for you at that point move on to the next series. Most shows* take a while to reach their potential, but until the recent stuff they’re all episodic enough that you can feel free to jump around a bit.

      *The original series is the exception, it pretty much hits the ground running.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The ones worth watching in my opinion are, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, finally Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks together. As for The Original Series, Enterprise, Discovery, Cadets, Picard, and the rest can be skipped. The Original Series is fun to go back to but it’s so unlike the rest I can’t get into it.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Putting strange new worlds above TOS is inconceivable to me. S1 of TOS alone has several episodes well above the best of SNW (Corbomite maneuver, city on the edge of forever, Balance of Terror). Though there’s also a decent amount of poorly aged material… pretty much agreed otherwise. Also, I agree they should watch SNW, just not in lieu of TOS

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Personally, I liked Enterprise. Flock is my favorite ST doctor by a wide margin (though I haven’t seen anything newer than enterprise, other than one of the reboot movies).

        It’s a different feel from the series that came before it, way more ad-hoc with what they are doing since they are the first human ship to boldly explore the unknown.

  • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Star Trek is one of if not the most prominent Science Fiction series in our culture.

    Star Wars is one of if not the most prominent “Science” based Fantasy series in our culture.

    They really aren’t at all similar on the most fundamental level. They just use similar set dressing.

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Post TNG and Voyager, they’ve been fairly blah with a handful of decent standout episodes.

    Maybe it’s because I grew up with these shows, and now I’m old I just want something with a bit more heft.

    It’s just all seems like light entertainment these days. Something akin to The Expanse is what I’m after.

  • GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk, Star Wars and Star Trek only share the sense that they’re both in space, overall both very different and we like both. Personally we like Star Wars more because autism brain but yeah start trek is good too :3

  • I think it’s a dumb debate personally.

    I love my space exploration show. I also love my space wizard drama, and my space politics show, and my wibbly wobbly spacey wacey show. I just like goofy shows in space.

    Except Picard. I don’t care for Picard.

    • cattywampas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I watch Star Wars for spaceships and laser sword fights.

      I watch Star Trek for courtroom episodes.

      (Although Andor is one of the best political dramas out there and must-see TV.)

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yes to Andor, and before that Rouge One was the best thing to come out after the admittedly cheesy original 3 (before Lucas added all the lame animation over them).

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Star Wars is an action/adventure/drama series that happens to be in space (they called it “space opera” for good reason).

      Star Trek is a science fiction series, at least until Fuller/Kurtzman (where it strayed more to action/adventure). You kind of have to bisect Star Trek into pre and post Roddenberry/Berman.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the best label for Star Wars is probably “Science Fantasy”. Personally, when it comes to this sort of differentiation, I draw the line at: is there magic?

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s not much actual sience behind the technobabbel of Star Trek tbh. It’s just as much of a magic system as the force is.

        • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Bormanis was given a hard task, to be fair. So many scripts just had (TECH) written where the writers needed help and Bormanis would have to shoehorn something in (and before Bormanis, the actors probably just made a lot of it up).

          Thankfully most of the science fiction isn’t in that technobabble but in the plot lines; questioning what it is to be human, to be civilised, and what meaning there is to life, post-scarcity.

          • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thankfully most of the science fiction isn’t in that technobabble but in the plot lines; questioning what it is to be human, to be civilised, and what meaning their is to life, post-scarcity.

            This point needs more acknowledgement. Star Trek isn’t a sci-fi show because it does or doesn’t have magic, it’s because it tends to follow the genre conventions of a (very soft, pop) sci-fi show. Easy example, Star Wars doesn’t tend to focus on questions like “hey are these robots sentient? How could we know?” while Star Trek can’t stop litigating that issue.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Andor and Solo are good, most of the rest of Star Wars including all the “space wizard” stuff is shallow as hell and far more casually cynical than Star Trek is.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure how you can defend Solo when one of its subplots is literally “the exploitative plight of droids is funny lmao”

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        And also "the one droid fighting for droids’ rights is

        spoiler

        literally turned into a permanently-enslaved appliance at the end."

  • 𝕲𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍🔻𝕯𝖃 (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you want to compare current stuff, then both are trash. sequel trilogy at least had the decency of being entertaining garbage while disco was 10% plot and 90% people talking about the 10% in case you missed anything while looking at tiktok.

    original trilogy and next generation are both good shit, and are good for different reasons.

  • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    The only real comparison I can draw between the two is both have disappointed me by moving away from their established brands and disappointing me.

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Star Trek going back into its own timeline isn’t something I’m excited for. I want to see what’s next. Its probably good, but it feels like revisions when I’m waiting for the next next generation.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Eh, they both have their place. I can’t get behind Jedi being emotionally stunted or the federation not using it’s tech to the fullest.

    My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      the federation not using it’s tech to the fullest.

      Funny you say that, since the Federation arguably doesn’t.

      Just look at warp drives, for example. A galaxy-class can go from reverse to full forward in a third of a millisecond. Smaller, newer ships like the Intrepid, of the Sovereign, would be both faster and even more agile.

      Federation starships should be zooming about the battlefield like dragonflies instead of slowly flying around each other like star wars ships. Though it makes some sense why they won’t, since the viewers would have a fit about it being unrealistic.

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        My biggest grievance is that the threat of death exists when, between replicators and transporter errors, they could populate their ships with unending clone armies to explore without ever risking anything.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Not having clone armies at least makes sense, since the Federation isn’t exactly that fond of cloning sapients, inorganics aside. Too many ethical issues involved.

          • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Ok, so instead of staffing a ship with 1000 duplicates of one guy who volunteers to go out and risk his life, they could add some extra storage to the transport buffer and require weekly backups of all crew. Then if redshirt #3 dies planet side they just spin him back up and tell him what went wrong. They have video game style save points on every ship and they’re using them to save on gas.

    • SatyrSack@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      My one exception is pre-Disney Mandolorians. Nothing is sexier than freefalling from orbit on the back of a 6 legged robot dragon with nothing but your platemail and a vague goal of scaring the shit out of locals.

      My knowledge of Star Wars is almost entirely pre-Disney, but I am completely lost here. What is that describing?