YouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end “$600 less than cable” ads::Google to “modify or cease” ads after industry review board rejects appeal.

    • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “It’s just the price of your daily coffee”

      I self brew my own value pack coffee because I’m poor. I even have a reusable metal mesh coffee filter insert so I don’t have to buy coffee filters, that’s how cheap I am.

      • neutron@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is this another one of those Silicon Valley syndrome where paying for an overpriced latte/chai/kombucha every day is the expected routine?

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes.

          It’s sad how much we’ve normalized overpaying for brown shitwater so we can work harder for peanuts.

      • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just use normal coffee filters, they are better for your health and are cheap af. The paper filters block some carcinogens that the metal ones do not. Your call, cheers

        • bitwaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          all espresso is poured using metal/without a paper filter. I highly doubt the entire nation of Italy is going to fall over dead because they’ve never had a coffee run through a paper filter.

          Its coffee. Not cyanide. Just drink it.

          • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do whatever you want, i drink coffee everyday, for me the cumulative risk isn’t worth it. its easy to remove the carcinogens and it makes the coffee better tasting anyways. Some people don’t know about the carcinogens and I like to inform them so they can make their own best decisions. You can huff glue for all i care bro

              • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Right, I dunno why some people are so obsessed with taking dumb risks. Like yea sure you probably wont get cancer or whatever but what if you did and what if there was a simple mindless way to reduce that risk? So silly

            • jmanes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is a great example of a “micro optimization.” It feels good but ultimately does jack shit to help you.

              There are studies suggesting adding paper filters to coffee increases bad cholesterol, and cardiovascular disease kills more people than cancer every year. Whoops? Brussel sprouts ever so slightly elevate your chances of getting cancer. Anything with an ethyl in it does too.

              All of this to say, pick better risks to worry about. Everything is a tradeoff. Better chance you die in a freak car accident rather than developing cancer from drinking coffee that was filtered without paper. It is not worth the fuss.

              • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What tf are you on about, I use paper filters and I literally never think or worry about it. Jesus christ what is the trade off in this hypothetical situation you’re creating. Debate lords just need to argue something i swear to god.

                • jmanes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Taste, environmental friendliness. Just to name a few. Feel free to ignore my comments if you don’t like them.

      • gronjo45@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh wow that sounds like an interesting engineering problem to make a reusable coffee filter… I am quite broke myself and my ears always perk up at ways to reduce my already small caffeine budget.

        How does it taste out of the metal mesh filter? I like to make mine in an Aeropress and heat it up in an old kettle that’s been in my family for ages.

        • niucllos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have an aeropress and have only ever used a metal filter with it! I’ve had normal paper filtered aeropress coffee and I can’t taste the difference

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have an expensive super automatic that I just pour beans in. No filters or disposable parts, just gotta pull the brew group out to rinse every week and clean it out occasionally.

        I paid $700 for the machine but have probably saved more than that between the k cups I was using before and going out for coffee way less (it’s not as good but it hits that espresso craving well enough for me), not to mention way more environmentally friendly while still retaining push button coffee. I now spend about $10/month on coffee.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did the same but I bought a cheap IKEA French press that I’ve had for 10 years. I think it was like $15. My coffee bean grinder was an old Krupp that I found in my parents basement from the 1970s, made in West Germany.

          • June@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I tried doing that but found myself just not using it. With coffee machines I kept putting off cleaning them until the grounds got moldy.

            For whatever reason (thinking executive dysfunction now that I have an ADHD diagnosis and am learning more about it) I was never able to manage using those tools regularly. Then came the Keurig and I immediately went from going to Starbucks 4-6 times a week to 3-4 times a month. Saved me loads, but never liked the waste of the k cups. I tried a reusable cup but had the same problem as the coffee machine and French press. Once income came up enough and it was within budget, bought the super automatic and I’ll be sticking with it until it breaks irrevocably because there’s no way in hell I can afford to replace it again since going from being a dink to a single income.

    • oakey66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I canceled that shit and got a homerun for football. If you’re going to just make me stream cable for the price of cable, you can go suck on a tailpipe if you think I’m paying over 850 a year. Fuck google. Fuck cable companies. And fuck these studios for thinking they can keep doing this to people.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Internet companies will only be cheap until they put cable out of business, then we will see cable company costs for Internet services.

      • arefx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You underestimate the amount of times boomers can rewatch Mountain Men and Deadliest Catch, and what they are willing to sacrifice to do so.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know, that’d a damn good point. We can judge the price all we want, but Alphabet has all the tools and analytics to say "lmfao guys watch, we can double the cost and we lose one out of 230 subscribers "

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still cannot understand how anyone decides to have 30% of their programming to be ads AND decide to pay for it.

      • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally the only reason we have TV of any type. We dumped YTTV for Hulu, but once they say we can’t share the package with my father in law well dump that too and I’ll go back to streams.

      • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the sports management people are hurting for cash in any way but there has to be some tipping point eventually when the value of the exclusive broadcast contracts is overshadowed by the losses from people just straight up not watching anymore.

        I live in Turkey but if I try to watch a legal MLB stream I am told I’m in a blackout region. What local advertiser or broadcaster is being harmed by me watching baseball from fucking Turkey!? They would rather change the literal rules of the game to drive engagement rather than just allow more people to watch in a convenient way…

  • redimk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what is the next step for Google? Raising YT TV to $100/month? $200/month? Raising Youtube Premium to $30/month? Google one to $200/month? Laying off employees?

    I mean they gotta keep hitting that 5% growth every year, right? When does it stop? When there’s nobody else at the company? When people can’t afford anything anymore and go bankrupt?

    When are companies gonna understand that growth for the sake of growth every year is just not feasable?

    • Ddhuud@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a matter of understanding the failure is systemic.

      Shareholders only buy shares for the expected growth, not so much for the dividends. Dividends are literally pennies on the hundred dollar costs. Single digits percent annually.

      • nephs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        At some point prices have to adjust to material reality and someone will lose money. Sometimes expected growth is not possible.

        • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hence when predatory shorting takes place while long institutions switch to short positions hoping retail joins in on selling shares to allow the stock to crater and delist from the open market thus facilitating cellar boxing to occur, making them even more money then they made on the upside. It’s why wall street actually loves bubbles and helps create them…

      • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well maybe retail but hedge funds love shorting shit to the ground. Having unrealistic growth goals sets a company up to eventually reach a point where they can switch the narrative to decline in a company because of missed unrealistic growth goals, that’s where the big boys make a lot of fucking money as once a stock gets delisted they can warehouse and never settle failed to deliver trades, or naked shorts that inflated the number of shares available to exponentially grow there position on the downside. It’s a game of siphoning money away from the public.

    • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      When are companies gonna understand that growth for the sake of growth every year is just not feasable?

      Depends when we actually enforce and support the SECs market reforms instead of defending them. As it sits once, that 5% target is no longer consistently hitable the naked shorts will start to come from maket makers and hedge funds allowing wall street to make just as much money in the growth stage as in the desth stage of a company plus when Google eventually gets to that point they can buy up all the IP during the bankruptcy process for their next unlimited growth candidate to usurp. Shit is absolutely fucked, plus congress has basically called out in their deals to keep the government running that the SEC can’t use any of the budget to further market reform, so your gonna need to vote in candidates who support Markey reform, and proper reform at that sense baring indivual household shareholders from being able to participate and get accurate disclosures on off market trade data, equity swap data, or just widening the gap between wall street and retail investors access to data is also considered market reform by those corrupt individuals supporting wall streets mess.

  • atetulo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can stream pretty much anything for free here: https://fmoviesz.to/

    Just make sure you have uBlock Origin installed.

    If you have any issues, try searching ‘free streaming sites reddit’ and go from there.

    Your wallets will thank me later.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never heard of this site before and you can bet I’ll be adding it to my bookmarks uhh I mean block list right away!

      • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The downside is that sometimes you get really bad quality, like some guy filming it in a cinema with terrible focus, contrast and sound and people walking in and out…

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The real value of those sites (and there’s a ton of them with mostly the same content), is that pretty much everything is there.

          No fucking about with JustWatch to find which of your services (if any) has it, only to find you can rent it for £15. You just type what you were after and watch it.

          And then switch to another steam and fuck about with the subtitles again because sometimes movies cut out halfway through, or the sound goes out of sync.

          • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t forget the part where JustWatch says it’s on Paramount+ so you go looking and it’s not there. Now you’re right back where you started, but you’ve lost 10 minutes because the P+ app is complete garbage.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve never subbed to P+, because every advert I’ve seen for it has somehow made me want it even less.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, you need a router or access points instead of a cable box. And you can stream it over Wi-Fi. Yeah, you can stream it over Wi-Fi. That’s why this is vaguely better than regular cable TV.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, it costs more because it requires less dedicated hardware?

        Of course, how did I not see it before

      • calewerks@fanaticus.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went back to cable and got an old cablecard and networked tuner. No rental fees for a box, and I can stream it wherever without checking in or dealing with location restrictions, and my DVR is still mine even if I leave and subscribe to something else.

    • guywithoutaname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One part of it is retransmission fees. Cable channels charge an arm and a leg because they can and broadcast OTA TV networks charge a fee as well even though their signal is free with an antenna. It just gets more and more expensive as a result as long as there are customers who can tolerate it.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used YouTube TV early on when it was a legit alternative to cable. It costs just as much so there is no benefit. I cancelled when the prices were raised to 45 a month. They can fuck straight off at 73 a month

  • nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Relevant bits

    YouTube TV launched in 2017 for $35 a month, but the base package is $72.99 after the latest price hike in March 2023. Google’s “$600 less than cable” claim was challenged by Charter, which uses the brand name Spectrum and is the second-biggest cable company after Comcast. The National Advertising Division (NAD) previously ruled in Charter’s favor but Google appealed the decision to the NARB in August.

    “Charter contended the $600 figure was inaccurate, arguing that its Spectrum TV Select service in Los Angeles only cost around $219 a year more than Google’s YouTube TV service,” according to a MediaPost article in August.

    A Google ad claimed that YouTube TV provided $600 in “annual average savings” compared to cable as of January 2023. A disclosure on the ad said the price was for “new users only” and that the $600 annual savings was “based on a study by SmithGeiger of the published cost of comparable standalone cable in the top 50 Nielsen DMAs, including all fees, taxes, promotion pricing, DVR box rental and service fees, and a 2nd cable box.”

  • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next advertising campaign: Cable companies sued to keep us from telling you how much money you’d save by switching to YouTube TV. Find out the numbers for yourself at calculate your savings link

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just YouTube TV. I was thinking about switching from the Spotify family plan to the YouTube family plan, but the Spotify family plan is $16.99/mo and the YouTube family plan is $22.99/mo. That does include YouTube with no ads, but it’s still too expensive for me. It’s just not worth an additional $6. Especially not while my adblocker still works. It does mean I can’t cast ad-free YouTube to my Chromecast because Google would not allow that, but I can live with it.

    • Taringano@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure your description sold YouTube family plan to a lot of people. I was ready to hate on it but after you describe that’s a pretty sweet deal.

        • Clegko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The great thing about YouTube’s family plan is that it also comes with YouTube Music and you can share it with up to 4 friends. If they toss in their portion of the plan, it gets way cheaper - something like 4 or 5 a month.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I need it to be a family plan because there’s me, my wife and my daughter and we all use Spotify, so we would all need to use YouTube Music.

    • danque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Install smarttube on your TV connected smart device. I installed it on the Chromecast 4k one with the remote and its a godsend. Even with your own official YouTube history for easy switching

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I had no idea YouTube TV costs that much, or that there were people paying that much.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah my parents pay for it because their only other option was Comcast and it was the lesser of two evils. They were paying like $250+ for phone, TV, and gig internet. The TV was like $125 or so, 300+ channels and about 250 of them were useless. At least with YouTube TV the channel listing is concise and the picture quality is good.

  • shaelz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it I thought I pay like $5 a month for my 1/6 portion of YouTube premium family account which included YouTube TV (which i never use)

  • AreaKode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol. My retired parents just switched to this because cable was too expensive.

    OTA antenna + Plex is the best combination for me. Any content with no subscription fees.

    • GeekFTW@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. I’ve had Plex set up for over a decade now, I just add in random fast stuff like Pluto/Tubi/ShoutFactory to supplement when I want something ‘else’. Last time I had cable was November 2009, haven’t had Netflix since 2013/2014 or so.