• ATQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    10 months ago

    Anyone a big enough drunk to take a shot every time Trump, himself, tries to object?

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fawx News: “Now back to continuing coverage of paint drying. Make sure to stay tuned because we have Hunter Bidens dick pics as well! Laptop! Biden Crime Family! NO! DO NOT TOUCH THAT DIAL! NOOOOOOOO!!!”

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      10 months ago

      He should. After all, doesn’t he know more about the law than anyone? And he’s a stable genius too. Sounds like he should save the money he’d spend on his lawyers and just handle his own defense. I’m sure he’d win easily in court, right? (Barely manages to contain laughter)

        • TechyDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Any lawyer who works for Trump likely asks for cash in advance. Either that or the lawyer is so bottom of the barrel and has drunk the kool-aid so much that they essentially are agreeing to work for free. (Because Trump WILL refuse to pay them whether he wins or loses.)

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      At the rate he’s going through lawyers who are willing to jump in front of the train for him he might actually have to. He might not be able to find a lawyer who’s willing to defend his sorry ass.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      10 months ago

      Everyone likes justice porn in America. The OJ trial was one of the most watched TV events in history at the time.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know about that. An awful lot of conservatives are bending over backwards to explain why Trump was justified in breaking the law multiple times. They certainly do care, and some people have even died over it. Remember the guy who tried to go after the FBIfield office in Cincinnati, OH?

      • Svengarlic @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve heard some arguments saying that if Trump “knew” the election was rigged, he had a moral imperative to do whatever was necessary to maintain the union. The fact that the charges exist at all is proof of conspiracy, and the trial is just a parade. While I don’t agree, it’s hard to get thru to people that don’t agree on the same objective reality.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Turns out if you lie often enough and about something and just keep repeating it, people will start to believe it.

          There’s unfortunately, also some evidence to the contrary that he privately knew he lost and did all this crap anyway.

          Nevermind the phone call where he asked the Georgia secretary of state to find him 11,780 votes. But, if that’s not enough to convince people he’s making shit up, nothing will convince them.

          Unfortunately, I’m dumb at psychology, and I have no idea how you would deprogram these people.

        • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The argument that someone saying they “knew” something, without being able to provide a shred of evidence to support the claim, is somehow direct proof of said claim is, flat out, retarded. They’re not logicians.

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. While I absolutely have a bias and want to see this fucker convicted, I feel like no matter what, it’s going to have at least one “Where were you when…” moment.

        Almost every generation has a couple. Where were you when JFK was shot? When the Challenger exploded? During 9/11? When Columbia burned up?

        I mean, obviously, reading the verdict is going to be there, but I feel like there’s going to be some real courtroom horseshit / ooohhhh shiiit moments too.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wouldn’t it be grand if we could end it on a high note, and stop thinking “I’m living through history” every 1-3 years?

          Oh, to know boredom.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was alive for the Columbia explosion, 9/11, the Challenger explosion, and Reagan’s attempted assassination. I saw them all as highlight reels on TV hours after the facts. I saw OJ’s glove escapade on the evening news. I expect there to be a Trump trial moment like that, but I don’t need to see it live, and I definitely don’t need to sit through hour after hour of courtroom procedure waiting to see that one moment.

          I’m glad the trial will be recorded for posterity. That seems like the best way to answer claims of shenanigans in any trial. Actually watching the trial, all the way through, seems a little too much like watching Nascar hoping to see a big crash.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            seems a little too much like watching Nascar hoping to see a big crash.

            NASCAR is not just about watching cars going around in a circle waiting for a crash.

            It’s “a day at the beach” for those who don’t have an ocean nearby. Tailgate parties and beautiful people dressed for the occasion. A reason to relax and enjoy.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Username checks out.

                In case you meant that as a slight, I live on one of the coasts, and have never been to a NASCAR event.

                • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Not a slight, it was a mademesmile perspective. Something a Cosmic Cleric might say when someone belittles something they don’t fully understand. I’ve never been to one either but the comment made me want to go to there.

      • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Never thought an empty old man, twiddling his thumbs, would draw me in more than the countless content streaming services have to offer, but here we are.

    • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s going to be the exact opposite. They’ll make a mockery of the justice system and turn it into a circus. The media will report every day and Drumph will keep his name continuously talked about. Meanwhile his team will watch what is reported nightly so they can strategize a narrative for “his viewers” while at the same time going as close to whatever line(s) as they can without crossing, but still keeping it a spectacle. It’ll be even worse than the 4 years he was president.

        • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Perhaps, but Alex could never say “you can’t do that to an ex-president.”

          Jones did say all kinds of other dumb shit, but not that.

          Trump also has a slightly more rabid following.

          Trump will just play the wounded lamb for a nationwide audience, 1/3rd of which will lap it up.

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Trials are about the facts tho and as they come out frump can’t really attack the facts. He can’t speak out during the trial so I’m not sure what you guys think he’s gonna even be able to do much less get away with.

            The place where it’ll matter is in the breakdowns by pundits. It will be very hard for the right wing machine to build viable defense talking points when the facts are so clear.

            • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Their defense is already established. It’s a “witch hunt”, “corruption”, “politically motivated”. Delegitimizing the current authority, where this kind of act is deemed illegal, is the goal. We have too many “uneducated” people, looking for “love”, in this country.

              • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                True, but u saw him lose a lot of support during the Jan 6th trials as they simply played the videos from that day. The trial will be largely the same. Evidence presented, cut and dry and there’s no ability for the right wing news cycle to spin this as not a crime.

      • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        They cross the lines every day. Just a little. Problem is, the lines moves to compensate, instead of standing their ground.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I was going to say that the conspiracy theorists would watch it simply to figure out all the ways this is a Jewish-space-laser-controlled judge presiding over an adrenochrome -addicted jury, with all the officers of the court being lizardmen in humanskin.

      Then I realized that was simply too much effort for them; they’ll just get their conspiracies from Fox and Tucker, and Joe Rogan as usual.

  • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m wholeheartedly behind the WGA & SGA, but god bless Georgia for coming in clutch with content over the next year plus.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This should 100% be televised. This affects us all. This was the attempted overthrow of our democracy and justice should not be hidden.

    There is way more benefit then problem with this IMHO.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wonder what sponsors they’ll have… Will the judge ask us to smash the like button?

    • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’ll be funded via concurrent 24/7 American Truck Sim stream (hosted by Will Smith) + charity raffle

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was thinking more like the following:

        “Donald J Trump is charged with 91 counts of sedition, treason, rigging an election, faking electors, and leaking sensitive documents to foreign nations… which brings us to our segue - do you worry about your online privacy while you are using a public WiFi? Then NordVPN can help keep your online dealings and documents safe and secure! Use code DUMP45 for 9% off every January”

        • root_beer@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          “You’re all a bunch of libtard snowflakes. You’re all triggered. So try BetterHelp; you can reach out to a licensed therapist any time, even by text, 24/7. Use CHUMP45 to get 6‰ off in January”

          [note: the per-mille is intentional]

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Free media coverage of anything Trump does tends to boost Trump’s popularity, even if a normal person would see it as stupid or embarrassing. So I’m in two minds about this.

      • ThrowThrowThrewaway7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is the 2016 election strategy all over again. “If we blast negative Trump coverage 24/7 people will finally wake up to how evil/racist/dumb/etc. he is!”

        This is going to be bigger than the OJ trial. He’s raised close to 10 million off of the mug shot alone. If he’s making that much off the “movie poster”, how much do you think he’s going to profit from the full-length “feature film”?

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          In 2016 they kept up stupid narratives about how “shrill” or “unlikable” Hillary was to “some” people as well. Also, they gave horse race style/ bothsiderist coverage to right’s utter nonsense about BENGHAAAAAAZIIII and things like email servers.

          They also decidedly did NOT give the real backstory on donnie and did absolutely nothing to really vet him for an American public that mostly only knew him from being a Bigly Successful Bidnessman on a game show someone else built around his fake image…

          Even for the famous tape where he is caught bragging about sexual assault, they chose to focus on the p-word and the pearl-clutching over how that is “locker room talk”, when the key issue is really that he’s bragging about sexually assaulting women because of the power imbalance, and not because he said the word “pussy”. Yeah, the media absolutely flubbed even that much.

          • root_beer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Flubbed, or just did like they always do and treat him (and his chud army) with kid gloves? I doubt they’d have used the “oh my stars please get me to the fainting couch” strat had Hillary bragged about grabbing a dude by the dick.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Flubbed, or just did like they always do and treat him (and his chud army) with kid gloves?

              Oh I have little doubt that quite a few within the media absolutely delighted in the idea of giving him lots and lots of airtime in order to fatten their wallets, and also a good deal of them really seem to just hate and despise the Clintons, especially Hillary, so they took every opportunity to take a shot at her. I do think quite a few thought that it was one big freaking joke and he could “never” win and engaged in lots and lots of bothsiderism over fears that the right will declare they are biased, hilariously, for the left.

              The right declares the media are all liberals anyway, no matter what they do, so I have no idea why there are so many in the media that bend over backwards to do the “objective” bothsiderist things.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Even when he’s officially declared ineligible in enough states to matter, conservatives will continue to waste their money on him instead of viable candidates. Let him bleed them dry. He can count all their money from behind bars.

      • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I understand but he’s going to make hay out of this no matter what. The good news is that this isn’t a debate with an imperfect moderator; it’s a judge who can slap real sanctions on people for breaking decorum. Trump won’t be in control.

      • cunning_bolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah but it’s extremely important for the future of this country for these trials be freely available so we all have the facts (even if people choose to ignore them).it’s just important 10-20 years later so the facts don’t get erased.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I am not going to watch any of that.

    When he was on the NPR news cycle five times a day I started yelling and cursing uncontrollably to the point where I was diving at the radio to turn it off or change the station so that I would not freak the fuck out.

    It doesn’t matter where Trump is. I don’t want to be there. It is a defilement to view him.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Practice stoicism my friend. Ppl on the left freaking out is exactly what they want. Treat trump and the gop the same way you treat clowns…laugh at them.
      It’s the thing they fear the most…loss of narrative.

    • 🍔🍔🍔@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      it’s crazy that trump has basically trained us all to be able to understand him because he’s basically incoherent. in speeches he alternates between pre-written sections that he is clearly struggling to read, and completely thoughtless ad-libs like “many people are saying this” which he will say about literally anything. and in more spontaneous formats he’s just all over the fucking place, he just leaves a trail of sentence fragments behind him until he’s decided he’s talked for an appropriate amount of time. and his voice, i mean, he sounds like mark hamill’s joker after dental anesthesia. they should play his speeches on speakers mounted to the underside of cargo ships to repel whales

      • rob64@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        mark hamill’s joker after dental anesthesia

        Wow, is that ever accurate.

        they should play his speeches on speakers mounted to the underside of cargo ships to repel whales

        You should consider a career in comedy.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      I get it. I always try to tune in for these kinds of things though, the somewhat boring dense slow trials, because I want to be better informed to counteract any right wing rhetoric I encounter. In particular IRL.

      plus it’s more mundane factual shit so I’m here for that, but if he treats it like the debates idk if I could all the interrupting to make no point just to get sound bites and derail the other person.

    • bjfar@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think him in a courtroom will be different, perhaps startlingly so. He won’t be able to just say whatever he wants, he’ll have to actually try to make a logical coherent case. Which, being impossible for him personally, means that I think we will not hear much from him. His legal team will do most of the talking, if he has any brains at all.

    • Phlogiston@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      He won’t be at the center of the action. He’ll be sitting and shutting up and letting his lawyers talk for him. And of course trying not to look guilty when the prosecution details his crimes.

      I too have avoided listening or watching him. This might be a really different thing.

  • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is going to backfire in a big way. Whole lot of people seem to think this will be justice porn or somehow convince his base of his criminality but it is going to do no such thing. According to one poll, the majority (77%) of likely GOP primary voters are already convinced the trial is “politically motivated”, with only 8% more concerned about him attempting to overturn an election. You can take a look at some polling here, there are other even more troublesome results as well: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-poll-indictments-2023-08-20/

    No matter how awful, contradictory, and ridiculous he will be in that court room, this is likely going to be a massive boon for Trump, and his followers are going to see it as the realization of their own fears of persecution. This man is an ascendant fascist leader, not the sad sack finally facing consequences that liberals so desperately want him to be, and the effect this will have on mobilizing his base to continue to escalate will be immense. These people do not give a single fuck about “”“law and order”“” no matter how much they pretend they do, stop assuming they will just accept things when he is found guilty. They won’t.

    I’m just trying to help people realize how dangerous and precarious this whole situation is. People were laughing and making jokes when he first announced his candidacy, and kept on doing it right up to the point that he won the election. Don’t make the same mistake again, because while yall are cracking jokes, him and his ghouls are hurting people. They are passing discriminatory laws, they are in the supreme court setting dangerous precedents and overturning inconvenient ones, and they are patrolling the streets looking for people to brutalize and throw in jail. They are committing hate crimes and becoming increasingly radicalized and mobilized.

    Stop pretending this is entertainment or business as usual, it’s not. I’m begging you to understand that the fascists are already here, and the longer they’re underestimated the better their chances of seizing control.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is going to backfire.

      First of all, never try to get inside a conservative’s head if you are going to come out with a loser defeatism attitude. 2nd, Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump will not have any control of the trial at all.

      of likely GOP primary voters are already convinced the trial is “politically motivated”

      That is the most important reason why the trial needs to be televised.

      Stop pretending this is entertainment or business as usual, it’s not.

      Another reason why it is absolutely critical to have the trial televised. I can remember the Watergate TV hearings and the entire country was riveted by the seriousness of the proceedings. The Jan 6 House committee televised hearing were also riveting for everybody who watched them in full. It will be like that only with everyone watching. The very reason for televising the proceedings is so that everybody understands the seriousness.

      • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Remember that Onion headline “man would die fighting to defend what he imagines the Constitution to be”?

        Many modern conservatives are like that. They will bleat all day about laws, and yet have never spent 2 minutes even reading a Wikipedia page about them.

        They’ll believe whatever pundits tell them to believe.

        Witch hunt? Unconstitutional? Politically motivated? Kangaroo court?

        Not for one minute will any of those law and order loving, institution-protecting, facts not feelings, crowd consider that Trump is there because of real actual crimes he really did commit.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Criminal trials are different tho. Especially when news agencies are doing nightly breakdowns of how bad this really is. Fox can only cover up so much…

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve said it before, religion primes people to believe stupid shit, as long as it’s delivered with conviction.

          Talking snake? No problem! Waking on water? You betchya! Kangaroo court? Don’t mind if I do!

      • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Begging people to understand the severity of the threat Trump and his followers pose is a “loser defeatist attitude”? If you genuinely think that anyone still supporting him is going to come out of watching this man on TV thinking less of him, or seeing it as a serious matter instead of some kind of political assassination of their dear leader, then you’ve not been paying attention for years.

        How many times have liberals been convinced “surely, this will be the end of him!” only for it to galvanize his base and further cement him as their figurehead? Stop thinking that his base has an even remotely similar worldview to yourself, you could show them all the evidence in the world of his wrongdoing and they will still find a way to pretend it’s not true. This is what I am trying to get people to understand, if you think fascists play by the rules you are sorely mistaken.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          but this isnt about his base. I have written them off long ago. this is about the rest of the country. galvanizing them into understanding the seriousness of what this two-bit used car salesman huskster tried (and continues trying) to do to this country is the point.

          republicans can not win power with their base alone. this was never about them.

          • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            As I replied to another person above, if you think my message was about votes and elections then you’ve misunderstood. This is quite literally a trial about an attempted overthrow of an election, their disdain for democracy is clear as day. The extent of that disdain, and what his base might be willing to do to get him in power regardless is exactly what I am trying to get people not to underestimate. Also, it might be a sobering thought to consider how many cops and soldiers are part of his base.

            edit: a couple words I missed

            • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Also, it might be a sobering thought to consider how many cops and soldiers are part of his base.

              So… bend the knee? These traitors are losing legal battles daily, and it’s all over the news. Let’s keep it rolling.

        • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Stop thinking that his base has an even remotely similar worldview to yourself

          Every single person here is fully aware of that. You’re proposing that we, what? Just don’t do anything? And anything that is done on a legal level be hidden from public view?

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Begging people to understand the severity of the threat Trump and his followers pose is a “loser defeatist attitude”?

          Begging that Trump’s criminal trial is not shown on TV so that people will never understand the critical severity of his crimes, just because you’ve been duped into mindless panic is a loser defeatist attitude. You are letting Trump neofascists bully you into favoring a less strict accountability. A handful of Trump’s followers committing suicide by cop do not pose a threat to the most powerful country in the world and by the end of the trial most people will understand that Treason Trump and other top neofascists are going to jail. Did Al Capone still have many followers after he went to jail? Nope.

          • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            His supporters are the cops. His followers are already in office, in courts, in law enforcement, and in the military at every level of each. They are already actively hurting people, indoctrinating children, destroying the environment, criminalizing minorities, brutalizing and killing dissidents, and both passing and enforcing laws to aid them in doing all of the aforementioned.

            This is not a mindless panic. Women are having their rights repealed, queer folks are facing increasing violence and threats of imprisonment, and just about every visible minority is facing higher incidence of hate crimes and discrimination. The majority of americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and people can’t afford average rent on average income (let alone minimum wage) in any city in the country. People are fucking starving and dying on the street, and the number one cause of bankruptcy is medical debt which is something that shouldn’t even exist.

            The refusal to reconcile reality with this fantasy of a powerful and healthy country is part of what has enabled fascists to ascend once more, and what keeps burying the bar for democrats further underground.

            Every time Trump gets put on TV because people like yourself are convinced that this time will finally be his undoing, his base and support grows. The amount of free publicity this fuck has gotten from people that are ostensibly his opponents is staggering. If you keep assuming that laws, ethics, morals, and rules are going to be followed by fascists, you’re in for a rude awakening.

            edit: a couple words

            • btaf45@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Okay Ivan. You keep on cowering in fear in the basement while level headed proud Americans do the critical necessary work of protecting our 240 years of democracy, defeating the neofascists, and moving forward with progress.

              • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Ah yes, the critical necessary work of waiting to vote every four years, sitting on your ass hoping fascism will sort itself out, and expecting the institutions you take for granted to protect you. Extremely brave and level headed, not cowardly or delusional in the least. /s

                The weird insinuation that I am in any way related to or supportive of Russia is a nice touch, because nothing says “moving forward with progress” like demonizing an entire population, almost all of whom have as little control over their government as you do yours. I’m sure those neofascists are shaking in their boots.

                • btaf45@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ah yes, the critical necessary work of waiting to vote every four years

                  The critical necessary work of putting Treason Trump and the neofascists on trial and televising it so the whole country can see.

                  sitting on your ass hoping fascism will sort itself out,

                  You’re the one calling for inaction and fear because the bullies might get upset.

                  I’m sure those neofascists are shaking in their boots.

                  This neofascist sure looks like he’s been owned by the libs

                  https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/fe792f17-6e1f-494f-bc6b-a9e740f16bf7.jpeg

    • Intralexical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m having difficulty finding a source because the information environment is thoroughly saturated on this topic. But IIRC, this has been tried before. There was a study where people who were thorough Trump supporters, the whole nine yards, when made to roleplay a mock jury and presented with the body of evidence available to the researchers at that point on one of Trump’s crimes, still nonetheless felt they had no choice but to face a reality that they didn’t want to believe.

      Narcissists and liars thrive when they can dominate the narrative, and flounder when they can’t. The Court system is designed around that. Hopefully it’s up to the task.

    • jtk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’re looking for someone that will let them get away with doing the awful things they want to do to people. They’re never going to change their minds about that. Ever. So we just… let them make that happen by letting them destroy democracy and law?

      Let them “take action”. They’ve already seen what happened to “the loyalist” that helped with Jan 6th and they’re not swayed. The sooner they’re in prison, the better off we all are.

    • Jode@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know about that. You should listen to the Knowledge Fight episodes featuring the Alex Jones trial. I have a feeling it’s going to be something like that.

      • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m just gonna ask you to take a moment and think about the gulf of disparity between these two figures in real terms. One ran a rather successful conspiracy grift show and the other is the former president, on trial for inciting others to attempt overthrowing an election. The fact that you’re even comparing the two as if people will drop Trump as readily as they did Jones, when he is still the front runner for candidacy by an enormous margin while gearing up to go on trial for treason is exactly the kind of underestimation I’m talking about.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You think trump can get a better attorney than Alex Jones??? Lol dude is toxic as a client and every capable atty knows it.

          • nantsuu@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean Alex Jones’s attorneys didn’t fare much better when they accidentally leaked all of Jones’s texts to the prosecution.

        • Jode@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s less that and more two self absorbed narcissists who have been drinking their own Kool aid for WAY too long.

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I quite agree. Giving a TV personality airtime is a dangerous gamble, and I’m not sure of the payoff the courts are looking for.

    • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are completely wrong. Why focus on idiots who won’t change their mind no matter what? The important voter base are moderates and independents. If you are staunchly Democrat your vote does not matter. If you’re Republican no matter what your vote does not matter. Sad but true. The people you’re so worried about simply don’t matter. If televising the trial convinces people who are on the fence then it’s the right choice. They’re just a small number of people.

      • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you read what I wrote and thought I was worried about how this would affect votes then you’ve missed the point completely. They do not care about votes or elections, their figurehead is literally on trial for trying to overturn the last one.

        • ganksy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not his die-hard magats that need to see this. They are only a majority of Republican voters. Independents are the largest block with Dems and GOP both smaller. It’s people like my dad that have never been forced to look at the details without fox, newsmax etc reframing. This is hard to look at, for anyone. I understand your pessimism.

          • polyploy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not pessimism. Fascists are already banning books, criminalizing trans people, reversing environmental protections, outlawing abortion and criminalizing those that seek them, rewriting school curricula with historical revisionism and fascist propaganda to suit their needs, perpetrating hate crimes, discriminating against minorities and political opponents, and their media is cranking out fuel for stochastic terrorism day after day. Hell, on the primary debate stage the other day, the candidates were talking about how they would each approach executing people at the border. Of course there was a layer of euphemism, it was about “lethal force in border security”, but a whole hell of a lot of the people on the receiving end of that are migrants and refugees fleeing the conditions american foreign and economic policy has subjected them to.

            I have clearly touched a nerve here because there are a lot of upset people downvoting what I’m saying, but I am not being a cynic or a defeatist, I am begging people to reckon with the reality of what is already happening. As I’ve said repeatedly, this trial is literally about how he incited his supporters to attempt overthrowing an election, and people are in here acting as if all that matters is how this might sway voters.

            Fascists do not care about democracy, why do you think the GOP spends as much time as it does gerrymandering and messing with voter eligibility, closing polling stations, and purging rolls? They are not going to be voted away, and they are not going to give a fuck about whatever ethics people are just hoping they will abide by. Rules are seen as an obstacle to be overcome, not a boundary which cannot be crossed.

            I said this in another reply but I’m going to repeat it here: ask yourself how much of his base are cops and soldiers, and then think about who it is that you’re expecting to step in when his base takes another swing.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    How can they actually get jurors for this?

    If the facts require the jurors to convict, there is no chance that this won’t ruin their lives (if not significantly shorten them). Even before then, it’s going to be a problem. His supporters have already declared and demonstrated that they are willing to use violence.

    Thank you, but I’d sit in jail as long as necessary to not be on any of these juries.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      How do you even find an impartial jury? I might be wrong but I was almost certain that an impartial jury is required to convict, which is why they always ask you about potential conflicts of interest when you attend jury duty. How many impartial jurors can there be at this point? Tbh, I’m not even sure I would trust an impartial jury with this case. To me, if you’re claiming to be impartial then you’re either lying, or you give zero fucks about politics and the people around you. Being impartial in this context has some really concerning implications about you.

      • MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Am I biased? Fucking absolutely and I hope he’s found guilty.

        Can I set aside my bias and only consider the evidence as presented? Also fucking absolutely.

        There are plenty of people who care enough about the rule of law that would let a man they hate walk free. If you can’t, perhaps you should be more concerned with yourself than the implications you ascribe to others who don’t deserve it.

        • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          My concern is that there’s a certain type of person who would have zero issues with lying about how impartial they are. Here’s a hint, they’re not like us.

      • Entropywins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I loath trump… but if I was on the jury I would do my job and set aside my personal feelings and listen to the evidence presented by both side and make a decision within the confines of the law… if the prosecution gave charges they couldn’t fully prove or over reached I hate to say it I’d have to find him not guilty even though I know morally he fucked up but it’s the states job to have competent prosecutors that do their job well. I truly hope the prosecution does a stellar job and gets a conviction and I hope those in the jury take it seriously and set aside personal feelings and listen to the facts.

      • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Being impartial doesn’t mean that you are midway between prosecution and defendant.

        Impartial means that you will take the facts presented to you at face value and derive logical conclusions from those facts.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think there are lots of people who have a strong belief in justice regardless of their ideology. Being impartial does not mean you have no foreknowledge of the case but means your willing to make a decision based on the evidence alone. Lots of infamous people are tried and convicted even though their case was quite public.

        The problem is I believe there will be a much higher possibility of people with a hard political conviction that will attempt to hide that bias just to get on the jury. And they might. People willing to ignore evidence even if God himself came down and testified.

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You raise a very good point. I think they should be able to use “innominate jury” (anonymous jury) so that the public and the defendants are not able to know who they are. I don’t know how common it is in RICO cases but it wouldn’t supprise me if this will be used in these cases.