Just going to pitch in real quick. Growing your eggs on site is way better for the environment, since they don’t have to be shipped to your grocery store from miles away.

Your chickens, even if you are a pos that doesn’t take care of them at all, will still have a better life than in an egg laying factory.

I highly suggest it. I had some for a while. It’s surprising how many eggs you end up with as well, you don’t need that many and it’s easy to give them a nice life.

What’s the name of the post and what did it link to? “Informational video” screams YouTube.

Rule 4 might be referencing their site wide rule against spam and ads.

It’s to manufacture rage. You need clever tricks to get a whole population to hate any kind of technological advancement.

Publishers usually get about 85 to 90% of the revenue on printed books, and 75% of the revenue on ebooks.

If using copyrighted data becomes illegal, they will get 100% of the profit from selling their data most likely.

This book should be aimed at them.

You’re barking up the wrong tree if you think I have trouble admitting I’m kinda gay for femboys. You are a weak person bro, both mentally and probably physically.

Nothing wrong with a guy dressing like a girl, you loser. I know it confuses you when you get a boner but boys in skirts are actually a really cool and fun thing. This isn’t the platform for your puritanical insecurities.

Are you hoping Meta or the copyright industry wins this case? Maybe I misunderstood.

I mean a loss for meta is technically a win for everyone most of the time but I’d expect more pragmatism in this case.

None of that matter if, right now, you are cheering on copyright laws. There’s no reason to stop promoting change now.

Encouraging laws you don’t like does nothing but cement them. We are currently, as a society, begging lawmakers for harder copyright laws.

I get the Justice system sucks but making the wrong laws stronger does not make it better.

Think about what you are saying is all, you tend to write long elaborate speeches on why copyright deserves to win. There is being critical of AI, and then there’s being a mouthpiece for copyright companies. I’m not trying to be mean here, sorry.

Obviously, the losers against this would be highly transphobic and homophobic. It must be rough having to create an other handful of alts each time you want your “contributions” to have any upvotes.

We don’t get better laws if everyone is cheering for the copyright industry. Everything after your first point goes against that. Goliath, the same one that beat up Aaron, finally has a match in his own weight category, and you are hoping he wins basically.

It’s weird that your take away is “Meta needs to get it” and not “Clearly, these laws work for no one”. You don’t get better copyright laws by cheering for the copyright companies.

Aaron wouldn’t be part of the side that wants to lock up all data behind a giant gate and give the keys to a handful of companies. Well, we don’t know what he would think, but I’m guessing he didn’t lean copyright.

They didn’t say seeding is fair use, just inherently part of torrenting. Good thing Sarah Silverman has pc gamer there to pander for her.

Better term would probably be generative AI to also cover music, video and my grandmother’s soul.

The whole area has little food security and no water security. A few desalination plants have already been hit iirc. It’s going to be a huge crisis.

One explanation I heard was that it was very close to a naval base and almost all the students were kids of high ranked officers. They killed their kids to send them a message.

I can’t find the video in the article to confirm, but I also heard it was double tapped.

I remember 15 or so years ago when they were using it in Gaza. First time I realized Israel were the bad guys. Watching it live then seeing all the news site shrug and take Israel side, even outright denying the use of it, was dystopian as hell.

Would you ban a user who felt an obligation to take a more active role in downvoting vegan content?

There’s a huge amount of Brigadoon related to AI content. People downvote and stalk the communities instead of just blocking them. I think the heavy handedness is justified, and I’ve even been on the wrong side of it (getting banned for posting in fuck AI).

I don’t know why the autocorrect gave me that but I’m keeping it.

All trade names, trademarks, and images and biographical information of people contained in the Cara Site are either the property of, or used with permission by, Cara.

From their ToS, they actually give themselves explicit property rights twice on top of the copyright.

A tweet doesn’t mean anything if they give themselves rights in their ToS. The ToS wins. What’s worse is this doesn’t mean anything against scrapping, since it isn’t against the law so they can only ban offenders.