• Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gee, I wonder if the cost might go down if we built more of them, as is the case with, y’know, basically every other complicated thing that humans build.

    • oyo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except throughout the history of nuclear power it has always gotten more expensive, regardless of time period, learning curve, adoption curve, or any other variable you care to consider. Solar, wind, and batteries have always gotten cheaper and continue to do so.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there some reason for that? What makes nuclear power fundamentally different from all other human undertakings?

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes that is exactly what would happen. To do that though, you really need state funding, state approval, and a secure supply chain as well as experienced engineers, management and construction and supply chains.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So even if I follow your logic, that nuclear plants will get cheaper and faster to build, wich I’m not, you still have to build the first generation of plants slow and expensive. So we either wait 15 years to get better at building those plants, or we just build renewables right now.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So we either wait 15 years to get better at building those plants, or we just build renewables right now.

        We do both. This isn’t a binary choice.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Money and manpower are not infinite.

            Functionally they are because different Capital Groups will chase different projects. For instance Bill Gates / TerraPower is heavily backing both Fusion and SMR Fission technology.

            Meanwhile other Capital Groups like Anschutz are piling money into Wind Farms then there’s yet other groups like Silicon Ranch pouring money into Solar Farms.

            It seems to have escaped the notice of most Netizens but the big money Capitalists have finally come out to play in the Green / Renewable Energy space. Sure there’s an absolute limit on the money and manpower that even they can afford but practically speaking those limits are so high that we’re unlikely to reach them.