I am not a teen.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not jusr sex. Most romance can be deleted from series and movies and they would not lose any plot. It is virtually always shoehorned in.

    • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah that annoys me actually more. You often already see in the beginning what kind of (predictable) romance is developing, which just distracts from the main and more interesting plot, adding some kind of annoying drama that is just not necessary.

  • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I have strong feelings about this because I miss horny comedies like American Pie, and sexy thrillers like Wild Things. I miss stuff like Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Boogie Nights, Office Space, Eyes Wide Shut, True Lies. They all had sex/nudity in a way that furthered the plot, or was just plain fun. All of the criticisms I see here sadden me:

    • “It doesn’t further the plot!!!”

    It can absolutely be an important part of the story. See the examples above. Look at most of our ancient mythologies. On top of that I pose the question: Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot? 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the story (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we’ll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

    • “I don’t want to watch that with my kids/parents/coworkers/etc”

    I agree. So don’t. Some of my favorite movies are raunchy comedies or sexy thrillers that I would never want to watch in polite company. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t exist! If art were constrained by what you wanted to display in front of your kids/parents/coworkers then our artistic & cultural landscape would be a much bleaker place.

    • “We have easy access to porn, I don’t need porn in my movies!”

    The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals a problem. Kids today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying “we have war documentaries so we don’t need war movies.” They are completely different things!!

    • “It’s usually cringey & not done well.”

    By that logic you could make arguments against a lot of different genres and classic story elements. I don’t like the argument that because media these days sucks at doing something they should avoid it altogether. I think they should just do better. Movies in the 80s and 90s proved it can be done.


    It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

    Sex is too important to be left to porn.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yes. Yes, yes, yes. I was having this exact conversation in another thread in c/movies not three days ago. The fear of sex is just astounding to me. And it being equated only to porn was more than a little troubling.

    • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh man, I wish I could give you more than one upvote. Thank you for this well reasoned defense of sex in movies.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.

      Nobody is saying you can’t have sexy comedies. We’re just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it’s not a comedy so I’m the asshole for laughing in the theater.

      It’s been ridiculous for decades and we’re tired of it.

      • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.

        A lot of action movies would be very short. My poor kung fu movies would need to be cut down to about 15 minutes. Why can’t we sometimes just have gratuitous things for the fun of it? Not everything needs to be high art.

        We’re just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it’s not a comedy so I’m the asshole for laughing in the theater.

        I don’t think that’s an inherent problem with sex/nudity/romance, the problem is just bad filmmaking. With good writing/acting/directing/editing that exact cliche’ scenario you describe could be done in such a way as to be genuinely funny, or touching, or sexy.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sure. Sometimes. As a specific movie made for that. Not every single show and movie producers can cram it into.

        • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nobody is arguing that all movies need to remove violence or sexy? Where are you even getting that from?

          But no one here is arguing the problem is inherently with sex or romance…you pulled that assumption out of your ass. The entire point of this thread is that unnecessary sex or violence is a crutch of bad film making…

          • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Nobody is arguing that all movies need to remove violence or sexy? Where are you even getting that from?

            The comment I’m replying to (and quoted) literally said: “If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.” And plenty of people in these comments are arguing that if sexiness doesn’t further the plot it shouldn’t be there.

            But no one here is arguing the problem is inherently with sex or romance

            Again, the person I’m replying to was explicitly saying that forced romantic scenes suck, as if they are inherently a problem. I’m just saying I think the “forced” part is the problem, not the romance/sex/nudity. People here are denigrating sex/nudity/romance in film when what they should be mad at is bad filmmaking in general.

            • AugustWest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              That is literally what everyone else is saying. You are arguing with no one.

              The problem IS shitty filmmaking. The specific examples of shitty filmmaking being discussed are pointless violence and pointless sex scenes that don’t contribute to the movie in any way.

              • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Uh no, lots of people here are arguing that all sex scenes that don’t actively move the plot forward are inherently pointless and shouldn’t be there. And I’m disagreeing.

                Sex/nude scenes can positively contribute to the mood, themes, character development, world building, and other things that aren’t absolutely necessary to move a plot forward.

                If the original article was titled “Teens want better implementation of sex in movies” I wouldn’t have commented. But most people aren’t complaining about “bad implementation” or “bad filmmaking” - they’re saying they don’t want sex in film at all unless ABSOLUTELY necessary, and I think that’s unfortunate.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would appreciate less violence too. It feels like since GoT they have to put some gory violence and some sex scenes into everything that is targeted at an adult audience.

      The point really is not about fundamental opposition. It is about being oversaturated and hence tired of it. That is why it is annoying when it doesn’t further the plot, is done cringey or well, seems like an attempt at being porn of some sort. That stuff worked in the 80s and 90s, when people still had to rent VHS. People being addicted to porn and harming themselves with their overconsumption but being in denial about it probably also adds in here.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        To be fair game of thrones turned out to be a scam. At the time we thought there was plot reasons for literally everything.

        I can’t even get 15 minutes through episode one now before the plot utterly collapses and I have to stop.

    • DjMeas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Great points! Personally for me I can do with less gorey violence. What I’m most interested in is good action sequences.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Even in kids movies I get questions like “does the goomba die when Mario smashes it?”

        Thats maybe an absurd example but I think it highlights how we see stories where characters often solve their problems with violence, even as a first choice.

        Sometimes the tone is wildly off too, like watching the good guy kill multiple people and then everyone is jovial about it.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          All those comic book movies are especially weird.

          Slaughter their way through an army of henchmen who presumably have families and homes to go to and are nothing more than hired goons, before getting to the mastermind and mostly just giving them a firm telling off and taking them to prison.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Statistically, there’s a lot more violence and a lot less sex for people under the age of 30. So it just kind of reflects the experiences of young people I guess.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s the stupid toxic “romance” that I want rid of. It gets so boring and tedious to watch. If it’s important to the story, then fine. But otherwise can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people without the need for bad relationship drama, jealousy, and normalizing the idea that when someone says no, they’re actually just “playing hard to get”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people

      Great idea. I would love a prominent TV show to have main characters of the opposite sex that are good friends and a romance is never shoehorned into it at any point.

      Warehouse 13 got sooooo close.

      • Deway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        Stargate SG1 did it as well or evem better than WH13 in my opinion. Sure Jack and Sam have some sort of romance but Teal’C, Sam, and Daniel are great friends. Atlantis did it even better with Ronon and Teyla.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, but not all the characters on any show were hooking up with each other outside of soap opera stuff. There was still an idea that two of them will end up falling in love. Why does that need to be part of the show at all? Let them all have partners outside of work.

          • imecth@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Romance sells. Will they won’t they sells. Sex appeal sells.

            It might seem cheap to you, but people do want and enjoy that kind of content.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Don’t you think people also might and want shows that don’t have those things? I really don’t think a single show where there is a mixed gender cast and no one ever ends up in bed with anyone else is going too far.

              • imecth@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’m sure some exist, but you’re an exception in not wanting that at all; most people want sex appeal and some romance.

                Sex is an intrinsic part of being human and influences a lot of our decisions, it’s only natural for it to be in our media.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  This is what I said:

                  Great idea. I would love a prominent TV show to have main characters of the opposite sex that are good friends and a romance is never shoehorned into it at any point.

                  A prominent TV show.

                  As in one. Singular.

                  So I’m not sure where you have gotten it into your head that I want no romance at all in media.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Honestly, Law & Order is good for this imo. Especially Benson and Stabler from SVU, and some of Criminal Intent with Vincent D’Onofrio and Kathryn Erba.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think you meant Elementary, but good point! I forgot about that show!

          Not only did they not get together, Watson made it clear that ain’t gonna ever happen within the first two or three episodes.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve had that show recommended to me before and I keep avoiding it because the subject matter doesn’t interest me, but I keep being told to watch it despite that, so it is on my long list.

          • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’m not sure what you think the subject matter is, but I was completely caught off guard. The main character is ostensibly in a “fish out of water” story, and that certainly creates a humorous backdrop. But the show is really all about mental health and wellbeing. People supporting each other while they learn to love themselves, deal with anxiety, trauma, and prejudice… It’s immensely beautiful, uproariously funny, and I will happily be the next person to recommend you watch it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s the sports part that held absolutely no interest to me because I think sports are really, really boring. But I’m told I’ll like it anyway, and you seem to back that up.

              • marquisalex@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                There are plenty of shows “about” subjects that you really don’t need to have any interest in to enjoy, because the show is actually about the characters. Like Succession, is any knowledge about or passion for corporate takeovers necessary? In Ted Lasso, the sport is there to motivate the characters, and is only very occasionally on screen.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The issue isn’t sex itself. It’s putting a sex scene in most movies meant for adult audiences. Imagine if there had to be a shootout or extended martial arts fight in every romance movie or Hollywood just wouldn’t fund it.

    Use it where it makes sense, and leave it in the tool box when it doesn’t.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s fucking crazy to me that this is a hot take these days. I just want movies to be good. Throwing unnecessary sex scenes into a movie to drive ratings up usually does not achieve that.

      Edit: And by unnecessary, I don’t even mean just not plot relevant. Only that they should add to, not detract from, the characterization, tone, or plot/story. Fucking loved Challengers (check it out, it’s great) and that had a sex scene like every 5 minutes. I just wanna watch some good fucking movies. If I wanted to watch good fucking-movies, I’d just find those online.

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        I saw… killing joke? Whatever movie was made off of that. The Batman Batgirl Makeout was completely unnecessary and more than a bit disturbing.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I thought they added romance to action movies for the female viewers. Lack of creativity turned romance into mostly sex.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m not a teen (far from it), but I’m with the kids on this one. The vast majority of sex scenes in movies are awful. They’re awkward and totally unrealistic. It completely takes you out of the movie. Most sex scenes are not engrossing or engaging, they don’t immerse you in the story, they push you out of it.

    Most every sex scene feels like it was made by someone who’s never had sex. Every angle is the right angle, every thrust is ecstasy, it’s nonsense. It’s like someone who thinks the covers of romance novels are depictions of real life.

    There are a lot of intimate moments that can be portrayed convincingly enough on film, but sex is rarely one of them. And it’s just not necessary. Let the audience infer, let us use our imaginations.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have a friend who’s dated a bit but has never really had a boyfriend. I think she gives up too soon because she expects a Hallmark movie where everything’s perfect and every kiss is magical.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know if that’s necessarily a bad thing, I kind of wish my standards had been higher when I was younger. I dated a lot of people longer than I should have, thinking that that was as good as it got. The fact that she is going on dates is a good thing- it means she’s at least getting an idea of how she fits with different types of people and she’s socially active.

        Obviously she might overdo it, but as long as she’s content alone as well, she’s not really hurting herself. I guess it’s a function of how regretful a person she is and her age.

        • Today@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          She’s 30 and has a physical disability that is obvious when she walks and requires her to use a wheelchair for longer distances. That makes dating difficult, so i hate to see her give up on people just because there’s no magic on the first couple of dates.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There’s a really good BBC miniseries about Oppenheimer made back in the 80s with Sam Waterston in the lead role.

        On the one hand, it doesn’t have mind-blowing special effects.

        On the other hand, there’s no sex scenes in a show about the scientist who helped make the atom bomb because why would watch a TV show about him and hope to see him fucking?

        I wouldn’t even want sex scenes in a Feynman movie and he was fucking every woman who was willing. It’s just not a necessary thing to tell his story. You can show he was a horndog and not show him fucking.

        Anyway, here’s the miniseries.

        https://archive.org/details/oppenheimer1980

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sorry, but this take feels out of touch. Every shot in a movie is at the right angle. Of course they’re unrealistic. Movies are unrealistic. Sure, some try to take a more gritty, grounded approach but in general art is trying to capture the highest and lowest points of life. Obviously it’s going to be unrealistic.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think they’re probably referring to films that were otherwise meant to be realistic, then there is this terrible, unrealistic sex scene that is just a distraction

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fair enough, though calling this stuff art is a bit much. Most TV shows and movies are better described as visual junk food than art. I think a bare minimum standard is for the work to stick with you longer than 5 minutes after you finish watching it.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Fair enough, but when you’re trying to recreate something as intimate and vulnerable as sex, it just stands out more. Of course when I’m watching a movie I consciously know that what I’m seeing on the screen isn’t real, but when it’s done right I’m so immersed that that part of my brain turns off and I’m able to get completely lost in the story or spectacle. But more often than not, when there’s a sex scene I get completely taken out of it and instead of seeing characters having sex, I see actors engaged in an awkward simulation.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s just boring, and defeats the purpose of good story telling IMO. It’s either uninteresting showing very little, or it’s like porn, and when I watch a movie, I’m generally not in the mood for porn.
      If they had great sex, it may not mean the same to everybody. But if you show them at a later point, like breakfast or something, and they are glowing and smiling bigly to each other, we all know what happened, and how it went.

    • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      As I said here:

      By that logic you could make arguments against a lot of different genres and classic story elements. I don’t like the argument that because media these days sucks at doing something they should avoid it altogether. I think they should just do better. Movies in the past proved it can be done.

      It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

      Sex is too important to be left to porn.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

        I’m not saying no character should ever be allowed to be horny, or sexual in any way. My point isn’t that we should pretend that human sexuality doesn’t exist, I just don’t think it’s always necessary to see it simulated (usually poorly) on screen.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      One point to disagree on: less teens than ever are having sex, and with no actual experience, their imaginations are based on porn. No wonder they’re terrified of it, if their first impression is what comes up when you Google “boy girl have sex”.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Too many parents are not open with their kids about sex. I made sure my daughter understood that there’s nothing shameful about watching porn or masturbating, but she should not expect actual sex to be like what she sees in porn and she will enjoy it a lot more if she won’t have those sort of expectations.

        It’s not enough to just tell kids where babies come from. You need to tell them all sorts of things that they really need to know about sex because otherwise they’ll learn bullshit from the internet and other kids. Tell them about the things I mentioned and also about things like contraception and consent and even about kinks and why you shouldn’t feel shame or be worried if your kink involves consent all around.

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well yeah, I think this is universal. No one wants to watch a sex scene with their parents

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I watched GoT largely with my parents. It shouldn’t be that big of a deal. That said, does it add anything? I can watch as much porn as a I want whenever I want.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Fair point I guess. If you want to watch porn with your parents, for some reason, but feel like that’s too far, I guess sex scenes is the best you can do.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t think of a single sex scene in a movie that added value to it. They’re pointless and akward to both the audience and actors.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Lol, If someone puts a gun against my head and says guess the most lied about thing in human history, honest to god I would say, Teens lying About sex.

    For some reason I question the validity of this study.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is porn now. Everyfuckingwhere. For free. So much porn. Niche porn. Hardcore porn. Fetish porn. You don’t have to jerk off to a lingirie catalog like we did when we were kids. Or sneak National Geographic magazines to see boobs. Sex in movies is just sad, stupid, and often unnecessary tittilation.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s this.

        I remember walking to the video rental store in the 90s to hire VCR tapes. We always tried to get that ones rated 18+ because there would be some boob stuff. Usually the attendant wouldn’t care.

        Now, fuck. Filtering porn out of my social media feeds is a daily ordeal.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        So what, we’re gonna remove gore and action scenes too? I’m not saying sex scenes inherently have more “value” than any other scene, I’m not even arguing they have any “value”, but there are a lot of movies out there that are 90% “unnecessary titillation” in one way, shape, or form.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          So what, we’re gonna remove gore and action scenes too?

          If they are unnecessary to the plot, and add nothing, then yes?

          Sex scenes are fine if they’re important to the plot, and/or they add to the movie or show in a valuable way. It just turns out that ~99% of the time, these scenes are completely unnecessary.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Disagree, in the world full of all sorts of sexual depictions this just feels like you’ve accidentally switched to porn - something you’re currently not intended to do and if you would, you’d look for it directly.

          It’s awkward, unnecessary and usually excessively artsy to be taken seriously, and actors might not be the kind of people you’d love to see sex scenes with.

          While I appreciate and share your look at sex as a continuation and natural part of romance, I think it is necessary to show the main part - love, devotion, trust, butterflies in the stomach - and the rest can be figured out.

          Something like “they lived happily ever after”

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah except people in relationships have sex.
            Like it just is a thing that people do for reasons of intimacy or power or excitement. There are lots of excuses for sex and just reducing life to
            "And they lived happily ever after and maybe had sex at some point
            Isn’t even the kind of stories I would want to read or watch.

            In the real world people have sex and if I want stories to feel real they are gonna do that if it feels right. Doesn’t mean it needs to be gratuitous but hiding it feels Puritan and not true to reality either.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              People in relationships also take a shit etc. Doesn’t mean we have to demonstrate it for further engagement.

              But I guess that’s a matter of preference anyway. Let’s just agree that there is no single best option.

              • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Sex should not be a myth that people are scared of and hiding it behind the extra that happens after true love does no help for the people who are now going to be afraid or perfectionists about a normal human experience.

                I don’t like bad writing as a sell point but sex in stories is not that most of the time. The things trying to sell themselves on shock will turn to other aspects just fine. Look at the romance movie that ended with 9/11 instead of a sex scene for that.

                I also think bathroom use can absolutely be included in a story if it works and is important to the story which sex as an intimate act with multiple characters usually is.

                I just don’t think pushing a side of less sex should be talked about is a good side to suggest as equally valid as it does not help anyone but those that want it to be a controlling force and act.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            If the plot is they slept with one another and now it’s awkward, it is better to at least show them passionately kissing the night before to set the stage for awkwardness later on

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Dunno. There are better sources too look for sex. Watching a movie with your mates is just awkward.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s lot of ‘need to touch grass’ level of discourse of sex being icky these days.

      Disclaimer: Based on my infrequent visits to tumblr and related subreddits.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Absolutely. Sex is viewed as either a prideful event to be overly open about or a dark hidden secret that only one should do.

          If all we have is extremes no wonder neither side feels very interested in it. It loses the fact that it’s a thing that you just can do. It’s an action that can have lots of intent behind it and some of it is needed for procreation.
          As is now it’s too surrounded by argument.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think that there’s a lot of anxiety more than puritanism. There’s a lot of reasons, but one of them is certainly the growing political divide; women are trending more and more liberal, and men more and more conservative. Women don’t want to get trapped by a man that doesn’t think that she should have rights, while men seem to think that they are ‘owed’ a woman to have their babies (…and how are they going to fucking pay for those kids, when they think their wife is going to stay at home, and they have zero fucking job prospects…?).

          TBH, if I was a woman, I sure as fuck would not want to risk dating men right now.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah I think that anxiety is the reason people don’t want to see it.

            The study also shows that they want escapism and fantasy stories that are only happy more than ever as well.
            Ignoring the harsh bits is the point and the anxiety of the topic of Sex itself is I think the key factor in it being taboo because people want to ignore that which makes them uncomfortable.

  • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    I remember watching the wolf of wall street on opening day with my parents when I was a teen.

    Based on that experience, I agree, that was so awkward lol

    • sOlitude24k@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      So, way back in the day, when Borat was released, basically my whole household loved it. Then, Bruno was announced! Another movie from the same guy, excellent!

      Wrong.

      I took my mom to go see it. In theaters. I don’t think I can really put into words the awkwardness of sitting through that film.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Bud, imagine your parents taking you as a teen to see Species (1995) because we all thought it was just some sci-fi alien movie…

      • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        My mom did something similar and dragged 13 year old me and my two younger brothers to go see Saturday Night Fever in theaters because the commercials had dancing and music, so she thought it was a musical.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have noticed over the years sex scenes usually add no value to the movie. If the sex scene was removed completely it wouldn’t change the story at all.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, while I do enjoy seeing occasional boobs (which most of the time aren’t even showed), if I want to watch sex, I’ll just put on some porn.

        IMO, The Room is one of the few movies where the sex scenes added anything. And even then, they didn’t add anything to the plot, they added to the meta plot, which was the story of a guy with a passionate vision but lacking the talent to pull off that vision, which IMO Wiseau does have talent doing, since he’s been able to recreate that same feeling in other content, making me think he’s playing a character (Tommy Wiseau the producer) he wants the audience to laugh at.