Ja. Du hast außer Kohle und Wasserstoff keine sinnvollen Alternativen, um aus dem Eisenerz, i.d.R. Fe2O3, Eisen zu machen. Der Sauerstoff muss irgendwo dranbinden und wenn du keine CO2 Emissionen erzeugen willst, dann bleibt nur Wasserstoff. Dabei ist allerdings auch das Problem, dass aktuell sehr viel Wasserstoff sog. “grauer” Wasserstoff ist, der bei der Verarbeitung von Erdöl und Erdgas erzeugt wird. Da fallen dann an anderer Stelle die CO2 Emissionen an.
nd musst du nicht über archive schicken. Die haben keine Bezahlwand.
Ich glaube nicht, dass es einen kausalen Zusammenhang zwischen gesetzlichen Verboten und Einschätzung von Gefahren gibt.
Da spielt eher eine Rolle was die Eltern aus ihren Medien erzählt bekommen. Beispiel “Killerspiel”-Debatte.
Und wenn die Eltern selbst stundenlang bei Whatsapp, Facebook & co. rumhängen, werden sie kaum ihre Kinder überzeugen können, dass das nicht gut für sie ist.
Die Union würde auch so Stunk gegen die Linke machen. Berlins regierender Bürgermeister hat zu Ramelow 2014 Folgendes gesagt (Achtung Springerpresse )
Es ist eine Schande, wenn 25 Jahre nach der Friedlichen Revolution die Partei der Stasispitzeleien und Mauermorde in die Erfurter Staatskanzlei einzieht.»
Die Aussicht auf einen Ministersessel sei vielen augenscheinlich wichtiger als demokratische Aufrichtigkeit, erklärte Wegner. «Ein dunkelroter Ministerpräsident wäre ein Schlag ins Gesicht der Bürgerrechtler und eine Verhöhnung der Opfer der SED-Diktatur.»
Derweil hat die Bundestagspräsidentin Julia Klöckner bereits zwei Abgeordnete der Linken des Saales verwiesen. Einmal wegen einer Mütze und einmal wegen einem Palästina-Shirt.
Ich bin überzeugt, dass selbst wenn die AfD bei 0% wäre, wir solche Manöver der Union hätten.
Ich stimme dir in deinen Schlussfolgerungen aber völlig zu. Nur ein AfD-Verbotsverfahren kann Klarheit schaffen und informelle Regeln werden immer zu Lasten der Demokratischen Parteien und zu Gunsten der Rechtsextremen Parteien missbraucht.
Du hast einen großen Schulhof auf dem alle Quatschen, Bilder und Videos teilen. Du kannst dir aussuchen welche deine Hauptclique ist, aber die meisten sind kühl miteinander und deswegen kannst du jederzeit auch mit den anderen Cliquen abhängen.
All of the quotes are from the wikipedia article and even the specific section you told me to read, which shows that you did not read much of it.
You mean the chemical weapons program built by Germany and the UK, supplied with precursors by further countries such as the Netherlands, Singapore and India?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_chemical_weapons_program
As part of Project 922, German firms helped build Iraqi chemical weapons facilities such as laboratories, bunkers, an administrative building, and first production buildings in the early 1980s under the cover of a pesticide plant. Other German firms sent 1,027 tons of precursors of mustard gas, sarin, tabun, and tear gasses in all. This work allowed Iraq to produce 150 tons of mustard agent and 60 tons of Tabun in 1983 and 1984 respectively, continuing throughout the decade. All told, 52% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin. One of the contributions was a £14m chlorine plant known as “Falluja 2”, built by Uhde Ltd, then a UK subsidiary of German chemical company Hoechst AG;[6] the plant was given financial guarantees by the UK’s Export Credits Guarantee Department despite official UK recognition of a “strong possibility” the plant would be used to make mustard gas.[7] The guarantees led to UK government payment of £300,000 to Uhde in 1990 after completion of the plant was interrupted by the first Gulf War. Saddam’s son Qusay was said to have been put in charge of concealing chemical weapons from international inspectors.[8][7] In 1994 and 1996 three people were convicted in Germany of export offenses.[9]
The know-how and material for developing chemical weapons were obtained by Saddam’s regime from foreign sources.[53] Most precursors for chemical weapons production came from Singapore (4,515 tons), the Netherlands (4,261 tons), Egypt (2,400 tons), India (2,343 tons), and West Germany (1,027 tons). One Indian company, Exomet Plastics, sent 2,292 tons of precursor chemicals to Iraq. Singapore-based firm Kim Al-Khaleej, affiliated to the United Arab Emirates, supplied more than 4,500 tons of VX, sarin and mustard gas precursors and production equipment to Iraq.[54] Dieter Backfisch, managing director of West German company Karl Kolb GmbH, was quoted by saying in 1989 that “for people in Germany poison gas is something quite terrible, but this does not worry customers abroad.”[
The chemical weapon attacks that the CIA tried to blame on Iran, despite knowing it came from Saddam?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack#Allegations_of_Iranian_involvement
Joost Hiltermann, who was the principal researcher for Human Rights Watch between 1992 and 1994, conducted a two-year study of the massacre, including a field investigation in northern Iraq. Hiltermann writes: “Analysis of thousands of captured Iraqi secret police documents and declassified U.S. government documents, as well as interviews with scores of Kurdish survivors, senior Iraqi defectors and retired U.S. intelligence officers, show (1) that Iraq carried out the attack on Halabja, and (2) that the United States, fully aware it was Iraq, accused Iran, Iraq’s enemy in a fierce war, of being partly responsible for the attack.”[30] This research concluded there were numerous other gas attacks, unquestionably perpetrated against the Kurds by the Iraqi armed forces.[62] In 2001, Jean Pascal Zanders of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)'s Chemical and Biological Warfare Project also dismissed the allegations, arguing that "The coloring of the victims is more suggestive of sarin, which was in Iraq’s arsenal.
The West created the threat themselves as they were happy for Saddams Iraq to slaughter Iranians with these chemical weapons.
Aus meiner Sicht eine richtige und wichtige Entscheidung. Schon der erste Absatz macht deutlich, dass die Berichterstattung von Bild/BZ über Tagesspiegel bis rbb oft ein verzerrtes Bild von Demonstrationen in Berlin darstellt, z.B. indem Behauptungen der Polizei unkritisch übernommen werden, dagegen die Berichte der Demonstrierenden inkl. Videobeweise oft untergehen.
Das die Staatsanwaltschaft Ankalge erhebt, offenbar ohne die Beweise gesichtet zu haben und dann selbst im Gerichtssaal für einen Freispruch plädiert, zeigt dass die Kritik der politischen Verfolgung mit Druck aus der Berliner Landesregierung nicht unberechtigt ist.
From your article
is an Arabic word that means “exerting”, “striving”, or “struggling”, particularly with a praiseworthy aim.[1][2][3][4] In an Islamic context, it encompasses almost any effort to make personal and social life conform with God’s guidance, such as an internal struggle against evil in oneself, efforts to build a good Muslim community (ummah), and struggle to defend Islam.[1][2][5][6] Literally meaning ‘struggle’, the term is most frequently associated with warfare.[4]
Jihad is a much more complex concept than crusades
According to Al-Baqara 256 “there is no compulsion in religion”.[84] The primary aim of jihad as warfare is not the conversion of non-Muslims to Islam by force, but rather the expansion and defense of the Islamic state.
This is fundamentally different to the crusades, where forced conversion and genocidial massacres against Muslims, Jews but also Orthodox Christians were common.
Muslims jurists of the eighth century divided the world into three divisions, dar al-Islam/dar al-‛adl/dar al-salam (house of Islam/house of justice/house of peace), dar al-harb/dar al-jawr (house of war/house of injustice, oppression), and dar al-sulh/dar al-‛ahd/dār al-muwada‛ah (house of peace/house of covenant/house of reconciliation).[88][89] The eighth century jurist Sufyan al-Thawri (d. 778) headed what Khadduri called a pacifist school, which maintained that jihad was only a defensive war.[90]: 36ff [10]: 90 He stated that the jurists who held this position, among whom he refers to Hanafi jurists al-Awza‛i (d. 774) and Malik ibn Anas (d. 795), and other early jurists, "stressed that tolerance should be shown unbelievers, especially scripturaries and advised the Imam to prosecute war only when the inhabitants of the dar al-harb came into conflict with Islam
Largely understood to be solely permissive for defensive war.
Within classical Islamic jurisprudence, during the first few centuries after the prophet’s death,[92] jihad consisted of wars against unbelievers, apostated, and was the only form of permissible warfare.[57]: 74–80 Bernard Lewis stated that fighting rebels and bandits was legitimate, though not a form of jihad,[93] and that while the classical perception and presentation of jihad was warfare in the field against a foreign enemy, internal jihad “against an infidel renegade, or otherwise illegitimate regime was not unknown.”
The first documentation of the law of jihad was written by 'Abd al-Rahman al-Awza’i and Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani. (It grew out of debates that surfaced following Muhammad’s death.[31]) Although some Islamic scholars have differed on the implementation of Jihad, the consensus amongst them is that jihad always includes armed struggle against persecution and oppression.
Both Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim asserted that Muhammad never initiated hostilities and that all the wars he engaged in were primarily defensive. He never forced non-Muslims to Islam and upheld the truces with non-Muslims so long as they did not violate them. Ibn Taymiyya’s views on Jihad are explained in his treatise titled Qāʿidah mukhtaṣarah fī qitāl al-kuffār wa muhādanatuhum wa taḥrīm qatlahum li mujarrad kufrihim. (An abridged rule on fighting the unbelievers and making truces with them, and the prohibition of killing them merely because of their unbelief). According to Ibn Taymiyya, human blood is inviolable by default, except “by right of justice”. Although Ibn Taymiyya authorised offensive Jihad ( Jihad al-Talab) against enemies who threaten Muslims or obstruct their citizens from freely accepting Islam, unbelief (Kufr) by itself is not a justification for violence, whether against individuals or stated.
According to some authors,[who?] the more spiritual definitions of jihad developed sometime after the 150 years of jihad wars and Muslim territorial expansion, and particularly after the Mongol invaders sacked Baghdad and overthrew the Abbasid Caliphate.[103] Historian Hamilton Gibb stated, “in the historic [Muslim] Community the concept of jihad had gradually weakened and at length it had been largely reinterpreted in terms of Sufi ethics.”[104]: 117 notes that “despite the theoretical importance of the idea of jihad in classical Islamic juristic thought”, by the time of the Abbasids, the concept was no longer central to statecraft.[81
When Europeans began to colonize the Muslim world, jihad was one of the first responses.[7]: 157–158 Emir Abdelkader organized a jihad in Algeria against French domination, tapping into existing Sufi networks.[7]: 157–158 Other wars were often declared to be jihad: the Senussi religious order declared jihad against Italian control of Libya in 1912, and the “Mahdi” in Sudan declared jihad against British and Egyptians in 1881.[76]
Rashid Rida and Muhammad Abduh argued that peaceful coexistence should be the normal state between Muslim and non-Muslim stated, citing verses in the Qur’an that allowed war only in self-defense.[2] However, this view left open jihad against colonialism, which was seen as an attack on Muslims.[2]
In colonial times Jihad was the legitimate defense against the colonial invaders. The concept of Jihad as a right to defensive war has largely been adopted into modern international war.
Modern Muslim thought had been focused on when to go to war (jus ad bellum), not paying much attention on conduct during war (jus in bello). This was because most Muslim theorists viewed international humanitarian law as consistent with Islamic requirements. However, Muslims later discussed conduct during war in response to terrorist groups who targeted civilians.
For Iran, which is largely Shia it becomes even less offensive:
In Shia Islam, jihad is one of the ten Practices of the Religion[136] (though not one of the five pillars). Traditionally, Twelver Shi’a doctrine differed from that of Sunni Islam on the concept of jihad, with jihad seen as a “lesser priority” in Shia theology and “armed activism” by Shias “limited to a person’s immediate geography”.
Ich denke die AfD hat schon immer mit Ambiguität und z.T. offenem Doppeldenk gearbeitet. Ich glaube auch nicht, dass die “neue Rechte” den offenen Bruch mit der AfD suchen wird, weil die AfD weiterhin das Bindeglied in die “Mitte” der Gesellschaft ist, die inzwischen massiv nach rechts gezogen wurde.
Dazu kommt, dass Hundepfeifen auch schon immer eingestreut wurden, sodass den harten Rechten klar ist, dass die Sachen härter gemeint sind, als sie gesagt werden.
Kubitscheck hat wiederum schon immer den “Anti-Establishment” Hardliner gegeben, wenn ich mir so seinen Wikipediartikel anschaue. Ebenso hat er beste Beziehungen zur AfD, in der er zeitweise Mitglied war.
Kubitschek selbst schrieb 2006 in der Zeitschrift Sezession, das Ziel sei „nicht die Beteiligung am Diskurs, sondern sein Ende als Konsensform, nicht ein Mitreden, sondern eine andere Sprache, nicht der Stehplatz im Salon, sondern die Beendigung der Party“.
„Unsere Aufgaben“ seien die „Zuspitzung der Begriffe und die Kennzeichnung der Gegner“.[49] In seinem Buch Bruchlinien schrieb er 2007 zur „Metapolitik“: „Wem sein Vaterland lieb ist, muß den Vorbürgerkrieg gewinnen, bevor er unbeherrschbar wird. […] dieser Krieg [ist] neben dem handfesten, den die Polizei und jeder Angegriffene auf der Straße und in seinem Viertel auszufechten hat, vor allem ein geistiger Bürgerkrieg gegen die Lobbyisten der Zersetzung […].“[50] Der „Konservativen Revolution“ während der Weimarer Republik attestierte Kubitschek 2011 eine bis heute andauernde „Strahlkraft“ und schrieb, sie sei „ganz und gar bereit für etwas Neues“ gewesen, „einen Dritten Weg, einen Umsturz, eine Reconquista, einen revolutionären, deutschen Gang in die Moderne. […] Von Harmlosigkeit, zivilisierter Zurückhaltung, Zahnlosigkeit keine Spur“.[51]
Nach dem Einzug der AfD in den Bundestag 2017 schrieb Kubitschek in der Sezession am selben Tag: „Im Grunde Schach: Wir fordern heraus, aber der Gegner will nicht, warf die Figuren um, jahrelang. Aber jetzt ist die Aufstellung fertig, die Dame fehlte noch, seit heute steht sie.“
Im Juli 2019 beschlossen die AfD-Politiker Alice Weidel und Björn Höcke nach Vermittlung von Götz Kubitschek, einander nicht mehr öffentlich anzugreifen.[82] Im August 2019 bezeichnete Weidel Kubitschek als „eine sehr wichtige Figur für das rechtskonservative Spektrum unserer Partei – auch wenn er nicht Mitglied der AfD ist“.[83] Nach der Wahl Thomas Kemmerichs (FDP) zum thüringischen Ministerpräsidenten mit den Stimmen der AfD-Fraktion Anfang Februar 2020 schrieb Kubitschek auf der Internetseite der Sezession, dass Kemmerich lediglich „die Figur“ gewesen sei, „die König Ramelow matt setzte, mehr nicht, und er hat sich – so ist das bei Figuren – nicht selbst geführt.“
Nach der Kundgebung in Chemnitz am 1. September 2018, bei der AfD-Abgeordnete an der Seite von Rechtsextremen und Neonazis demonstriert hatten, empfahl Kubitschek, der an der Veranstaltung ebenfalls teilgenommen hatte, allerdings: „Keine Großdemonstrationen mehr unter der Fahne der AfD. Laßt das andere machen! Die Teilnahme empfehlen, sich unters Volk mischen, Gesicht zeigen, an der Gegenöffentlichkeit mitwirken und die Sympathie der Wähler gewinnen – das kann man auch, wenn man nicht den Hut aufhat und in der Zwickmühle steckt.“
Für Kubitschek ist das hier also nur der neuest Zug im gleichen Spiel. Ein Spiel, dass er mit der AfD zusammen und nicht gegen sie spielt.
Iraq wasn’t an “intelligence failure”. There was tampered “evidence”, singular sources blown out of proportion instead of their veracity challenged and wild computer animations to drive the point home with the public.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_Iraqi_mobile_weapons_laboratories
They knew they were lying, just that today it is even more brazen. The US needed to produce images of “strength” after 9/11 so it was clear they will invade someone. They didn’t invade their allies in Saudi Arabia despite most of the perpetrators being Saudi nationals. It was clear to seasoned politicians that this is a sham aimed at producing the right images and seize the opportunity to reshape the region.
What is Britain going to do in response that could harm Palestinians more? Start bombing themselves instead of telling Israel where a lot of people are sitting together in a tent and delivering the bombs for Israel to drop?
I’m also not sure if such acts really are helpful at disproving the popular resentment that all palestinians are radical islamists, terrorists or in bed with hamas.
If you glue yourself to the street in a climate protest, you are already labelled terrorist in countries like the UK and Germany. Meanwhile Germany is applauding Israels war of aggression against Iran and peddling lies about weapons of mass destructions like it is Iraq all over again, although this time around the IAEA and American intelligence agencies kept stating publicly that there is no evidence of such weapons in Iran.
So far the governments have been ignorant to legal protests. The governments instead often crack down with massive police violence and criminalization of freedom of speech against peaceful and fully legal protest. Just yesterday the Council of Europe has published a letter voicing its concerns over the massive repression in Germany. There is no indication that governments like the UK or Germany would stop their complicity without any pressure.
So the option people have are:
a) watch a genocide and only raise your voices in the small frame tolerated by the government, knowing that it will not lead to any change
b) interfere with the infrastructure used to facilitate genocide
Meanwhile Israel is using starvation and the promise of aid to lure starving people into places where Israel can massacre them more easily. But nonviolent actions are the real extremism here…
Düsseldorf, Solingen, Mönchengladbach, Bonn, Dortmund, Minden-Lübbecke, Coesfeld, Leer, Gotha, Meißen
Viele von diesen Kreisen sind für eine starke Rechtsextreme Szene bekannt. Ich würde mich nicht wundern, wenn da die lokalen Nazis jeweils massiv Inhalte gemeldet haben und Meta die Accounts ohne Rücksicht auf die Plausibilität der Meldungen gebannt hat.
Der dritte Weg ist eher Dunkelgrün mit leichtem Türkiseinstich. Anscheinend hat man auch einen besonderen Fable für das römische Imperium. Nazis bleiben halt “Volksverräter”.
Wir wissen natürlich, dass die AfD mit aktivistisch gewaltätigen Neonaziszene besten vernetzt ist und sich zunehmend auch in diese Richtung entwickelt.
Danke, Formatierung am Morgen macht Kummer und Sorgen.
I don’t think so. People of palestine action have faced prison sentences for nonviolent crimes. And they have been active well before Russias fullscale invasion of Ukraine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Action
Palestine Action was established on 30 July 2020 when activists broke into and spray-painted the interior of Elbit Systems’ UK headquarters in London.[2] The organisation’s co-founders are Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, and Richard Barnard, a long-term left-wing activist.
Filton 18
An initial ten people were raided and arrested by counter-terror forces under the Terrorism Act on 19 November 2024 in relation to an August action against the Elbit Systems HQ in Bristol,[47] in addition to those previously arrested on the scene who were charged for non-terror related crimes.[48][49] In total, 18 activists were held in custody, dubbed the Filton 18.[50][51] Tom Southerden of Amnesty International said the terrorism powers were misused to circumvent normal legal protections, resulting in excessively long pre-charge detention.[52] Documents released under Freedom of Information suggest that the UK government shared contact details of counter-terrorism police and prosecutors with the Israeli embassy during the investigation into the incident.[53]
https://palestineaction.org/prison-sentences/
Two people who took direct action to dismantle and occupy a weapons company, were sentenced to prison after pleading guilty to charges of criminal damage. A third, who had taken part in the action was acquitted at Chester Crown Court. Out of the two imprisoned, Mike Lynch White, a scientist, was sentenced to 27 months. The other, was sentenced to 16 months. Usually, approximately half of a custodial sentence is served in prison.
This would be a ridiculously ineffective way to waste operatives. Also if there was any plausible links to Russia, there is a strong reason to assume that something would have come up in the “counter-terror” investigations and heavily placated by the British and Israeli government to delegitimize the group.
If we look at actual Russian sabotage we see exploding parcels, drones around military sites, arson attacks…
Nonwithstanding, the fact that two people on an E-Scooter could break into an airforce base, damage planes there and leave undetected will surely be followed closely by Russia and is a huge security failure for the RAF. If people can drive in a fire extinguisher full of paint, Russian operatives could drive in a bunch of explosives and destroy all the planes on the tarmac.
Production license.
Russia got the plans how to build the drones from Iran and pays a certain license fee for every drone they build in Russia.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/05/29/russia-iran-drone-cooperation-industry/
Production of weapons under licensing deals is quite common in the arms industry, especially as it helps to circumvent national export restrictions. For instance the second most common rifle in the West Asia region (after Kalashnikov variants) is the German Heckler & Koch G3 as millions of units were produced by various countries in the region under licensing deals.
Regarding the involvement of the UK in Intelligence flights for Israels attacks, but also for facilitating US arms deliveries i can highly recommend the investigative work of declassifieduk. The UK while providing less military aid than the US or Germany in the shape of arms deliveries, is extensively involved in Israels attacks through logistical and intelligence support.
https://www.declassifieduk.org/britain-secretly-sent-500-extra-troops-to-cyprus-base-being-used-to-supply-weapons-to-israel/
https://www.declassifieduk.org/why-have-israeli-military-aircraft-been-landing-at-a-uk-air-base/
https://www.declassifieduk.org/britain-sent-over-500-spy-flights-to-gaza/
An eine Hasstirade einfach noch einen Fantasiebegriff anhängen und man ist fein raus?
Ehm doch? Deswegen gibt es doch Antidiskriminierungsgesetze, die ganz wesentlich auch auf die Behandlung bei Arbeits- und Ausbildungsplätzen abzielen. Wenn man wegen seines Aussehens, Geschlecht, etc. und nicht wegen seinen Leistungen und Eignung abgelehnt wird, dann ist das natürlich eine Abwertung und im Widerspruch zu “gleichwertige Persönlichkeiten”