This is really a big step in my opinion, as language choices can shape opinions, as the article states “a ‘significant step forward’ in recognizing the preventable nature of road collisions.”

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Why don’t we use the word accident again?”

    “Because accident implies there’s no-one to blame.”

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The official new word is “collision”.

      Also “accident” is being phased out in recognition of the fact that crashes should be prevented, not considered an unavoidable or acceptable downside of automobile use.

      Accident implies there is no culpability.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The official new word is “collision”.

        Oopsie, I just had a collision in my underwear.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          While I suspect you’re just trying to be funny, this could be read as an attempt to trivialize car-related fatalities by comparing automobile accidents to bowel malfunctions.

          People don’t usually die from pissing themselves.

          Edit: I’m not trying to shit on anyone’s fun, but I leave comments like this because I don’t like the idea of some hypothetical lurker even accidentally walking away with misinterpretations.

          It’s like how you can make fun of bigots using sarcasm, but sometimes they just take you seriously, and walk away thinking you’re one of them. I hate when that happens, and sometimes you wont even know if it did.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        There goes the automobile industry’s last bits of influence on the public at minimizing the mechanical death machines

  • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    “Collision” is the word. While most of them aren’t intentional, very few of them are unavoidable. See, e.g., the lady who passed me on a double yellow blind curve on a 25mph residential road in front of a school, only to stop next to me at the red light 50ft down the street

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good. There is nothing accidental about the horrible way people drive and the utter disregard for other’s lives that they display behind the wheel. Cars are a horrible way of getting around but people’s bad driving makes things so much worse than they need to be.

    My dad and I have jokingly been calling them “intentionals” for a while now.

  • GiveOver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Casually everybody will obviously carry on saying “accident” for now, but I wonder how fast it will filter down from official language to every day language. Would be interesting to watch the trend over the next few decades. Like how people still say “road tax”.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    He said: “Most crashes are not ‘accidents’ but are avoidable, normally by drivers and other road users paying more attention.”

    And to take it a step further, some blame should be cast on the peoole who design roads to be as dangerous as they are.

    You can design a road that effectively forces drivers to both pay attention and drive more slowly.

    But since roads aren’t designed with safety in mind, you get far too many "accidents"🙄