• alex [they, il]@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    287
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Being emotionally detached from really stupid leadership decisions is harder than it seems

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    226
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The company doesn’t care about you. The company doesn’t care about you. The company doesn’t care about you.

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      11 months ago

      My uncle spent years preaching to me about the need to be loyal to a company. I never drank the Kool-Aid. He spent 21 years working for an investment banking company in their IT department. 4 years before he was set to retire with a full pension, etc. his company was acquired by a larger bank. He lost everything except his 401k. He then spent the next 12 years working to get his time back so he’d be able to retire. He died 2 years ago and the company sent a bouquet of flowers.

      THE COMPANY DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOU!!

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The company cares about you in the same way a beef farmer cares about his cattle.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not even if you do valuable or efficent stuff for the company. You’re disposable.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The most important traits for doing well at work (in this order):

    • clear, effective, and efficient communication
    • taking ownership of problems
    • having your boss and team members like you on a personal level
    • competence at your tasks
    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m halfway through scrolling this long thread, and this is the first comment I’ve seen that isn’t overly cynical. It’s also correct.

      I’ve been working for 38 years, and I’ve been someone who makes promotion decisions for 15 of them. The third one is helpful, not essential, but the others are super important. The people who rise to leadership positions aren’t necessarily the top technical people, they’re the ones who do those things with a good attitude.

      The other thing I’d add is that they’re people who are able to see the big picture and how the details relate to it, which is part of strategic thinking.

    • maporita@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was taught that my job is “to make sure all my bosses surprises are pleasant ones”. 15 years of working as an engineer and that never changed. Now I have my own business and that’s the thing I look for employees… someone I can leave on their own to do a job. It they have problems they can always ask me. If they screw up I expect them to tell me immediately and to have a plan of action to fix it and to prevent it happening again. And I never ever get cross if someone does come to me and say they screwed up. Far better that we tell the client about a problem than wait until the client finds the problem themselves.

      Reading all these comments makes me realize how lucky I’ve been in my career. I’ve always had great bosses who defended me and backed me up.

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure if the competence is really in the last place. I’d say it’s on the equal level. Great communication and ownership of the problems means little if you can’t really solve the problems.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        People have those things in spectrums, not all or nothing. You have to have at least some of all of them, but I’d argue that mediocre competency with really good communication and accountability is a better combination that really good competency with one of the others being mediocre.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I still kinda disagree. We’re talking here about engineering role after all. I have a colleague who is a code wizard, but has kinda problem with (under)communicating. He’s still widely respected as a very good engineer, people know his communication style and adapt to it.

          But if you’re a mediocre problem solver, you can’t really make up for it with communication skills. That kinda moves you into non-engineering role like PO, SM or perhaps support engineer.

          But I would say this - once you reach a certain high level of competence, then the communication skills, leadership, ownership can become the real differentiating factors. But you can’t really get there without the high level of competence first.

          • raze2012@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            We’re talking here about engineering role after all.

            where? seemed like general advice.

            Even then, thee aren’t mutually exclusive. your competence will affect how people see you on a personal level, at least at work. And your competence affects your ability to be given problems to own. You’re not gonna give the nice but still inexperienced employee to own an important problem domain. they might be able to work under the owner and gain experience, though.

            Documentation and presentation are highly undervalued, and your ability to understand and spread that knowledge can overcome that lack of experience to actually handle the task yourself.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think we might be agreeing, it’s just that “mediocre” means different things to each of us. My team supports human spaceflight, and no one we have is crummy. The “mediocre” people have pretty decent technical skills if you’re looking across all software development domains.

            Personally, I’ve found the decent technical skills to be easier to come by than the other ones, and having all of them in one package is a real discriminator.

  • incogtino@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your employer does not care about you. You are not important or irreplaceable

    Take your time and energy and put it into your life, not their business

    I have had coworkers die (not work related) and by the time you hear about it (like the next day) they have already worked out who will get the work done so the machine doesn’t have to stop

    • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had a workmate develop a chronic illness after an infection of COVID, and he had to leave under hardship. People that hung out with him as best mates for years stopped talking to him in a matter of days.

        • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          I sent him a few 3 message to see how he was doing. NGL we weren’t super tight before COVID, we never hung out outside of work, and people not masking around me really drove a wedge between us. I’m trying hard not to justify what happened, but who knows maybe I am a little bit.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think taking action to fill a hole is indicative of not caring.

      • Misconduct@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        True but there’s also absolutely no reason to think they care. Even if someone dies. Because they really don’t. So it feels extra soulless when they send out the email redistributing tasks right after the generic condolences email that goes out to the whole floor

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, how do you gauge how much someone cares? What would make you think someone cared (either at work or anywhere else)? I think all actions by a company would make people think it’s just an unempathetic gesture. Even if it was a small company and the employee was there for very long and was actually missed.

    • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      This depends. I’ve had easily 100 shit jobs where nobody cared. I’m now a software developer for a small business <10 employees and they do care.

      I am aware I am living the dream now and this can’t be the case for most.

  • Waldowal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    You don’t have to run the rat race to get promoted. You don’t have to be at your desk at 7am and leave at 7pm to put on a show. Just be competent. Most people are not. You’ll eventually get promoted once you are old and white enough.

    • ours@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      11 months ago

      Getting promoted isn’t a race. It’s a marketing campaign. The squeaky wheel gets the grease sadly. I hate it but that’s the game. You can be great but if the right people don’t hear about it it won’t bring a reward.

      The funny thing is it’s a loss for the employer since it means people spend time self-promoting themselves and their achievements instead of just doing things well.

      • robotrash@lemmy.robotra.sh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Some leadership will actively not promote you, even block attempts by you, if you’re at the top of your role and consistently outperforming peers, why would they let you move up? You make them look good right here.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Getting promotions and raises is rare. Haven’t seen that happen very many times. However, many people have told me that the best way to get a raise is to switch to another company.

      • beckie_lane@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I worked at “AT&T wireless” back in the day when dirt was new. This guy would say “ squeaky wheel gets the grease.” One day after he said that our team lead said “Or gets replaced.” Then they walked his ass out.

      • McScience@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah. I always tell newbies “nobody ever got a promotion for work their boss didn’t know they did.” Sadly if you produce 100 units of value and the boss only knows about 10 of them the guy who did 20 units but won’t shut up about it looks 2x as valuable even though he’s actually doing 1/5 the work. Trick is to be doing the most work and have people see it

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        If we take it from the other side, it’s difficult for management to understand how well you’re doing if you’re not communicating it properly, especially if your job is highly technical but they aren’t. Technical experts who would understand your work alone don’t necessarily make good managers.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I must not be old enough because I’ve never been promoted even though I’m practically white as a ghost. Every promotion I have ever received is from getting a new job at a new company and ending up making significantly more money that way.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just be friends with the manager. That’s who I found was promoted the most in my career.

    • Pansen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fully agree. You can be lazy AF, as long as you get a few key assignments done or overfulfill them. Everybody will be like ‘ooh, he so good’ and forget that you don’t do shit for 95% of the time.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It should be noted that this is advice specific to white men in Western countries 😆 but yes, it’s true.

  • Polymath - lemm.ee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The longer you work anywhere – and I mean ANYWHERE – the more you see the bullshit and corruption and crappy rules or policies and inequality all over.
    For me it has been about the 3 year mark anywhere I’ve worked: once you get past that, you fade away from “damn I’m glad to have a job and be making money!” and towards “this is absolute bulls#!t that [boss] did [thing] and hurt the workers in the process!” or similar

  • demlet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Success is mainly about sucking up to the right people. No matter how good you are at your job, you have to know how to play work politics. Most bosses don’t know how to evaluate actual ability, and they’re much less objective than they think. Usually they favor more likeable employees over capable ones if forced to choose. Human life is a popularity contest, always has been, always will be. That’s the side effect of being a highly social species…

  • Durotar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    11 months ago

    My company laid off a few very efficient workers, who sacrificed a lot of time and mental health for the company, because people working remotely in India are cheaper.

    • NimbleSloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Sounds like a company I worked for. I saw the writing on the wall and got out. A lot of good people were laid off and a second office in India was opened…

  • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    11 months ago

    People in your workplace don’t know shit. There are a few who know stuff but the majority is dumb, careless or the combination of the two. Surprisingly the higher you go the more dumb and careless there are. We are designing monster billion dollar construction projects and some of my colleagues have problems with understanding written english. Others cannot learn a software that has literally 3 buttons in them they have to press. I don’t even know sometimes why I am trying.

  • Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I believe the exact same thing is true.

    I have yet to see an employer even attempt to prove it wrong.

    Showing up and working sluggishly is the most stable pattern. Getting it done quick and then relaxing only attracts attention and criticism, and as mentioned: More work for no increase in pay.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      11 months ago

      Getting it done quick and then relaxing only attracts attention and criticism, and as mentioned

      The trick is getting your task done quickly and then pretend to still be working on it while actually doing nothing.

      • ChilliDownMySpine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I disagree. There’s nothing worse than having to pretend to work. I’m more drained after a day of scrolling than I am after a day of stressful 100%-work. The best imo is around 70%-work.

        • _number8_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          i think it’s the mental stress of knowing this time could be spent on something meaningful but instead because of horseshit protestant work ethic - brained boomers it must be wasted

          kind of like those sick sick stores that destroy merchandise before throwing it away because god fucking forbid someone else could use it. spitting in the face of humanity.

          • SnowBunting@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Agree. How many hours humanity could use elsewhere. Being creative, exercising and having fun.

        • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Behold and bask in the glory of working from home! Here, all your free time can actually be spent free! No more alt-tabbing to a random Excel spread sheet or dumbass email everytime the floor boards outside your crap ass cubicle squeak. No more desperately searching for mildly enjoyable activities that are only slightly conspicuous when viewed from over your shoulder. Revel in a world where if you bust ass and finish what you need to you are actually rewarded with the free time to cuddle your dog, take a nap, binge stardew valley, or just do absolutely nothing.

          The fact that it is for this exact reason working from home is hated by old farts is so unbelievably frustrating it’s difficult to put in words. I know they like to word it differently like “lack of productivity” or “lowered team dynamic” (which have both since been repeatedly disproven by what little research we have) or some crap but we all know they just can’t stand not knowing exactly what we’re doing at all times. It honestly feels like they’re just irritated that workers are genuinely happy for once.

      • demlet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can touch type at about 70 wpm. Why? Typing practice looks remarkably productive to anyone who doesn’t know what I’m actually doing. I also find doing math puzzles helpful. Making little calculations and drawing diagrams looks super impressive to clueless managers. Of course, such strategies depend on apathetic managers.

  • Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Efficient workers get more work if you’re in the office. I work from home, and that allows me to work efficiently until my work is done, set up scheduled emails to go out at the time I would’ve otherwise been done, then do what I want until then.

    • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I see your work doesn’t have invasive programs that check idle mouse and idle keyboard behaviors.

      this is an old one but i can’t help thinking, what if they installed it without my knowledge, after all, my work laptop was given to me already pre prepared by our IT department.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is an entire department at my work that employs thousands of moderators to review desktop screenshots of all employees every 5 minutes to make sure no one is “idle”.

        Makes me want to scream when I think about it.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, they’re pretty behind the times, and I’m happy for that. They gave me a work laptop, but since they didn’t block me from just using my home computer instead, I just do that so that I’ve got an excuse if they ever bring up any strange data they might be skimming from the laptop. It’s been a couple years now without any word from them about it, though, so I think I’m in the clear.

        • rolaulten@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fyi. If your IT department is remotely on top of things - they know. They just might have larger fish to fry.

          We can see all kinds of things about any devices that log on to check email, connect to the VPN, etc.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, I figured they’re aware I’m not using the laptop - I’m not on the VPN most of the time as a result. I’m still able to do all my work in my own copy of excel, though, so I’m hoping I can continue pretending I’m unaware that I’m not following the correct avenues to get my work done, at least until they force me to use the laptop.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a double edged sword. I was very efficient, and did get more work, which got me noticed and eventually promoted out of a doing position into a leading position

      It’s a nice change, the work is light, the people side of the work is easy. I have higher pay and much more free time

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You you’re writing up more time that it actually took you. That is fraud.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m not writing up anything. I clock in when my shift starts, I complete the work designated for me for that shift, send it out by the time it needs to be sent out, and clock out at the end of my shift.

        • Kalash@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          57
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not writing up anything. I clock in

          … same fucking thing, Einstein.

          The non-fraudulant thing would be to clock out when you’re done.

          • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s not fraud, that’s called “working smarter”. Not giving us a raise to account for inflation, now that’s fraud.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe it’s meant to be, but my parents taught me about deliberate ignorance, and I intend to use it.

          • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I remember those halcyon days when calling each other Sherlock and Einstein was the zenith of insults.

            On the playground.

            During recess.

            In the fifth grade.

            • Kalash@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Which seems appropiate since most of people in this comment chain seem to be teenagers who’s only argument seem to be “boss bad” and “work bad”.

              • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                A lot of us speak from experience… it’s not just some opinion pulled out of thin air and being reductive and dismissive isn’t solving anything.

                • Kalash@feddit.ch
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Well, surely there must be more constructive replies to that situation that just slacking on the job or wirting up fake hours.

                  Like does everyone here work for Evil Corp itself? If it sucks so bad, quit. Find a better job.

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most employers pay you to be on standby for last minute tasks. That’s what you are doing for the rest of the time. You are also planing on how to do these tasks more efficiently. That is all billable in my opinion.

  • masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    11 months ago

    I learnt meritocracy is a joke long before I discovered that it was literally invented to be a joke.

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Loyalty is vastly overrated. The only rational course of action is to complete exactly the tasks to which you’ve agreed for the wage they’ve determined. Your employer will demand loyalty but never reciprocate. Don’t let them manipulate you.

    Also, never ever let them see you sweat. It doesn’t matter how good your employer is, at the first hint that you’re insecure, they’ll pounce and you’ll be treated like garbage. Always have your briefcase packed and a box to clear out your desk on a moment’s notice.