Any.

My first guess is that the first, fourth, and fifth ones are the lies.

Slander is generally used when something is…

1. Taken out of context
2. Presents something as wrongful when it’s not
3. Leaves out when an issue has been reconciled

What you’re spreading is a mixture of all of these things (there were at one time things I was actually guilty of, but I have since reconciled with all of these, and nothing you’re showcasing in the way you showcase them is an accurate depiction of me), and from the looks of it, you’ve only ever done it for the sake of it. Much of the accusations you throw at me, including supposedly defending Nazis (when nothing I’ve said is about defending any kind of murderers at all), exist ironically for the very reason that I try to look things over, analyze world issues and personal issues, and consider my sources, so many of which were fact-checking sources. Never did I say Fox was one of these, and being banned from wherever I’m banned from (which definitely doesn’t include five places) is not indicative of someone’s behavior, especially since the whole point of a place or service being federated is that people can manage things based on their own discretion. As someone who has been in charge of a number of places before, I also thus consider it wise that, unlike some people, I’ve never ban-evaded.

You say that like I don’t have proof of the part about me being banned from five places here being false, that bans are supposed to be seen as conclusively indicative about who someone is (especially when the whole point of a place being federated is that each part can act according to its own ideas), that half of the bans I’ve gone through weren’t them taking other peoples’ reasonings for me being banned for their word, that taking the national majority/ADL/Snopes stance on a gesture is the same thing as defending Nazis (I consider myself a rule-abiding member of this place; what was I supposed to do, not pay attention to misinfo?), that I was actually saying Fox News was reliable just because I cited them in my responses, that I’m any of the other people you talk about, that things said or done years ago that were reconciled for (some of which was taken out of context) should have any bearing to a rule-abiding individual in another location, or that I’ve been ban evading.

Hey, sorry you bother you again, but they’re back at it again, but in replies this time (while slandering me, and all the community owner did was lock the thread) rather than in the form of an OP. Could you or @smorks@lemmy.ca do the same thing again please?

I do in fact.

Sarpa salpa can make you very high. I realized it but didn’t do anything about it.

Oh. That’s impressive. People must like their burgers.

In any case, I don’t mention the whole pariah thing for no reason. To put it one way, imagine for a moment, being habitually involved with something that’s so trigger-ready to outcast you that it will take the words about you by someone who was given the boot from the community as gospel, despite the fact that, along with being demonstrably and chronically wrong, actually arise from an attempt at being tolerant despite you being painted as anything else. Then ask yourself what you’ve been through that is closest to that, and think of whether that warrants a tip. I for one tip waiters and waitresses for their friendliness.

You’d think there’d be more activity if the chart was being accurate. I barely know like fifty people.

How does one count the amount of people on a service?

One dollar for every person on the service who hasn’t yet considered me a pariah. I’m actually serious about that.

There’s a pair of identical twins in another family I’m close to. Their names are Christina and Constantina. Their parents didn’t think they’d survive because both twins have Turner syndrome, and so whether you’d call it superstition or fear of attachment, the parents were more open to names. They were eventually named Christina and Constantina (with each’s first name being the other’s middle name), which I felt almost destined them to me because I come from a long line of Tinas. I wouldn’t have named them anything else (albeit using up what names I would name anyone). These days, I’m like their second mom.

As of now, this is how it would work until something I say in the future were to override it, either in part or in its entirety.

Except for money that contains a negative value (more on that in a bit), all my money, which currently mostly includes rai stones, would go to my currently only non-technical BF, but on the condition that he can take care of my pets. Everything (and I mean everything, even things that one might not think of in this context) of mine that wasn’t a part of an inheritance would go to my two best friends (with a vote, one with no unprescribed options that lasts seven days amongst any group of people that specializes in polling, deciding who something goes to in case there is a schism over who gets certain things, with votes always able to override previous votes if anyone feels the need, with the one with the most voting participants being the most valid if there are two polls at a given time), and this would include the things that would otherwise go to my only non-technical BF if he wasn’t able to fit the role I describe here. Except for things of mine which have a negative monetary value, which would go to whomever I deem to have wronged me the most (supposing I make it explicit), the rest would go to the twins whose family I often mention I help.

I would appoint my best friends’ children, or accurately-put the closest thing to children, to be the ones who, if working collectively, are to finish whatever ongoing projects I have going on when I die, be them creative, competitive, or of some other nature, including the fulfillment of my will itself, at least concerning parts that are not, naturally, dealt with by other people where we all live. I would appoint my guy best friend as my proxy when dealing with matters of sorrow towards others on my behalf, and I would appoint my other best friend, currently his mate, as proxy when dealing with matters of forgiveness towards others on my behalf. I would appoint my three step-step-kids (the kids of the ex of my only non-technical BF; believe it or not, they are my age due to how the family operated) as my proxies for everything else, but only collectively (as in only things said and done in consensus could be counted as being on my behalf, and no one of them is my proxy on their own).

I would ask that my body be broken down into parts that were useful for surgical, medical, or scientific progress and to be used to the best of the ability of the parts being broken down, supposing a beneficiary is found who would be grateful enough to pay it forward, with my step-step-kids being able to meet the beneficiaries if possible, and I would ask for the rest of my body to be broken down into parts and chemicals that either might have some considerable value if sold and/or given to the right people or might have some nutritional value for birds of prey, with the beneficiaries of these, too, hopefully being grateful enough that they may channel their gift in a way that others may find some kind of relief.

If these actions cannot be performed, or if for some reason successfully completing all that would be physically insufficient to render me unable to be buried, I would aim for a tree burial, but as per whatever burial laws are in effect when I die, if I must get buried in a way that involves a stone, assuming I had not successfully gone awol right before my death in order to escape the fact that will-fulfillment companies take money out of the dead person’s inventory to pay for death-related expenses once the body is found, I’d ask for the stone to double as a birdhouse (the kind of birdhouse is the choice of the person fulfilling the will). Might as well let a bird live in it. And I would ask for what I leave behind to be maintained well for as long as a year hasn’t gone by when a bird hasn’t lived in the stone.

As for what I’m buried with if I am buried, I wish to be buried wearing the clothes I normally sleep in, with everything else I normally sleep beside being buried beside me. That also includes whatever pets I last had at the time of dying, though if the pets are still alive, if possible, wait for them to die first before digging me up to bury me with them. It is better they be spared and miss the chance to be buried with me than to be killed just so they can be buried with me. This isn’t Mesoamerican sacrifice. If possible, if it turns out I’m called to be buried, and assuming my significant other is buried and doesn’t mind me being buried with him, I would also like to be next to my significant other, but that isn’t a strong request either.

I don’t 100% separate the concept of spouses with the concept of boyfriends. Certainly if you ask me, a union is a union. I consider what I have with my BF to be equal to that of how people think of spouses. Though it gets complicated because my first BF has been on and off about what we have because him being hospitalized for viral brain issues disrupted our perception on what could count as closure. The semantics of it change like the wind, and it’s not like you can ask someone in a coma how they see a relationship. After that whole thing started, I’ve had five technical boyfriends, technical in the sense that they haven’t gone past a certain degree of relationship-related activity, though only one has really disagreed with me on the first point. I guess the closest I come to being a legal wife then is with the first BF and helping care for him and vice versa.

Most of what you said, including the part where you mention groups I supposed help run, is rendered moot by the fact that I’m not the same person as anyone else. I’m not sure why you consider Davel reliable here. The proofs provided with OP challenge that.

Also never have I defended Nazis just because I take the fact-checked stance regarding the controversy surround his rally gesture (or that Fox News is wholly reliable; earlier I brought up the fact that, love it or hate it, especially with Trump as president, with our two-party system, the notion that Musk’s gesture is supposed to be seen as a Nazi salute is a minority position in the US, something I brought up not to appeal to authority but to allude to the fact that anyone who uses that stance as a reason to close their doors to someone is closing themselves off to a lot of people, with this being the only reason I would have brought up Fox). I do NOT support Fox of all people, but Snopes and the ADL aren’t even right-wing.

We go over why the rest is misconstrued most of the other times you bring all that up.

I’m not sure if the term is au pair or sponsor or what it is, but the closest I get to being a mom is there’s a pair of identical twins named Christina and Constantina who I help with who are like a decade and a half younger than me. I take care of them both at home as well as at my grade school teaching aid job sponsored by my uni.

Not really anything. Nobody came.

I’m taking the fact checker’s stance.

That isn’t the same as defending Nazis, who I vehemently denounce.

None of that is true, and a part of the whole point is the fact this Davel conjures lies like he thinks nobody will question them.

Nothing you just said is true, something the OP proves.