• Chloë (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 month ago

    Did you know that the best way we currently have to store energy are dams? In most dams you can install a pump to take water and store it higher, then when energy is needed you simply open the turbine.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      351 month ago

      The problem with dams or pumped storage is it only works in specific places where you have a higher place to put lots of water.

        • @SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I would be all for that, but I think a lot of smaller tanks of compressed air might be better or easier.

          A dam would be a huge natural tank. I can’t think of a similar structure that is safe enough to prevent widespread destruction.

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      You need a certain kind of landscape for that. I think the UK only has a couple of pumped storage power stations due to lack of suitable sites

      • @freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Pretty sure geographically germany still has a few nice spots for it. Allgau, Schwarzwald, Pfälzerwald …

        It’s just all these damn people with their damn towns and livelyhoods that are in the way.

    • BigFig
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Hydrogen and Methane Power-to-gas can store more power for longer than hydro pump

        • @Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          20
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The downvotes are because almost all of the global hydrogen production is made either with natural gas, as a byproduct of oil drilling or through coal.

          In its current state, it is a fake green product pushed by the oil industry to hamper the transition.

          • @PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 month ago

            Ah - that makes sense, thank you. You’re correct, but I work in the aerospace industry with hydrogen fuel cells and green hydrogen is all I’m familiar with, but I realize now that this was bias on my part.

          • @catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            Is hydrolysis not cost-effective? If we have excess electricity, as in this case, can we not use that to get hydrogen?

          • BigFig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            On the recent lemmy topic of using up votes and down votes incorrectly.

            Literally just stating a verifiable fact, not in support or against the technology, and I get down voted lol.

      • Chloë (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        huh i hadn’t heard of this one? I went to a dam last year and that’s what the guide told us…

        • bobburger
          link
          fedilink
          41 month ago

          I think it’s the physical size of the reservoir that is the limiting factor. You can’t reasonable expand most reservoirs, but it’s relatively easy to create new hydrogen/methane storage tanks.

          • @sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Yes but pumped storage is about 80% round trip efficiency vs power to x which is barely touching 20% out of the lab. And power to X needs an epic fuckton of very clean water, which also isn’t easy to find.

      • @sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        At huge inefficiency loss though. Denmark is probably further with this than anywhere else in the world and even they are sputtering on getting this going.