• @Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27910 months ago

    I wish them the best of luck. Not that they have any chance of success but the more damage they cause to the Russian army, the better

    • @perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8610 months ago

      Was there actually anything stopping them before, other than some traffic cops with a grenade launcher, and some excavator operators frantically digging up the motorway?

    • Jaysyn
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      FSB as an organization needs to die to the man before anything good can happen in Russia.

      • @marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        Maybe. It depends if they keep control afterwards… or better, on who keeps control afterwards.

        • BNE
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Oops, All Taliban!™️

      • @CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1910 months ago

        Considering they’re arguably even worse than Putin, we probably don’t want them to actually have a chance at being successful, it’s just that any forces Russia has to use to stop them are forces they aren’t using in Ukraine. Giving them funding would be a seriously bad move.

      • @Jumper775@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        If Biden funds them Biden funds a direct attack on Russia, due to the increased pressure Russia will take that as an attack from the US and will escalate. We want to deescalate everything we can because we don’t know if putin will use his nukes, and if he does the world ends. Putin will not win a war with the us though, so he may not care about the end of the world.

        • @skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          nukes were never on the table. putin’s goal number one is holding power in russia, and it’s no fun when it’s all shiny glass or when you’re dead. the reason behind invasion? believe it or not, also holding more power within russia. over two decades of putin’s presidency, he carefully molded his electoral base to consist of nationalists, and every time he invaded another country his ratings went up (2008, georgia, 2014, donbas, 2022, ukraine, at least initially) because even if your elections are faked, you need it to be believable and you need to have some real support. that’s even how he got presidency in the first place, by initiating second chechen war

          in this situation, what options putin does have?

          • he can’t sue for peace right now, or deescalate in a big way, because his electoral base will see this as a sign of weakness and move on to another rabid nationalist
          • he can’t escalate, because he has little to escalate with, in terms of (modern) equipment and (mobilized) manpower. mobilization is an unacceptable political risk, additionally, he runs a risk of corresponding western escalation, with west is much more capable of, and would consist of equipment only, which is much less politically risky
          • he can’t use nukes, because there’s already nuclear bunker buster with his name somewhere in the midwest and he probably wants it to stay there

          the only survivable option for putin seems to keep intensity at this level or lower, try to limit western aid, and try to slowly grind through to whatever propaganda objective he wants. remember all these russian threats, that if west provides whatever equipment, they will use nuukes! it seems that everyone called bluff on this one, multiple times. conversely, the more favourable scenario for ukraine is escalation. more info here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWKGYnO0Jf4 https://yt.artemislena.eu/watch?v=fWKGYnO0Jf4