• Natanael
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You need to read what I wrote again because you flew by my point with light-years of distance

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bud there’s no way I’m getting into a slapfight with someone that either:

      • Doesn’t understand that the creative output in your scenario comes from the artist not the commissioner.
      • Does understand that, but managed to articulate their point that badly.

      I don’t have much self respect, but I’m not spending what little I do have on something this goofy.

      (Edit: And who apparently is that bad at articulating their point, but characterizes the people falling victim to your lack of capacity for eloquence “dumbasses”…)

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s the damn point, my comment is directed at uncreative prompters who think the dice roll machine gifts them creativity, and you misread me badly. Was the context not enough?

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Your comment was ambiguous - I agree with the sentiment now that you’ve added the clarifying edit, but your behavior in response to the ambiguity you failed to identify is icky.