Yes.

Meanwhile intelligence agencies says they want to stop encryption to help them investigate crime…

Lobbyists selected by rich people tell politicians who to appoint to lead agencies. These people give directives and can get agents fired for disobeying.

Stopping it means removing “single points of failures” like not having such a powerful hierarchy, in addition to accountability measures (independent inspections, etc)

Pressure wash

Well, unless they also made key generation shitty, because that’s equally plausible and would likely allow RSA keys to be broken (it’s surprisingly hard to generate RSA keys safely)

Presidential pardons for state crimes don’t exist. Claiming he’s done it does nothing. Signing fancy formal papers saying so is null and void.

Unreliable certainly. For as long as there’s radio coverage there’s a way, but it used to be impractical to give passengers enough bandwidth. 20 years ago you’d have to ask the captain nicely to get a call routed (read: have an emergency)

If you allow civilian HAM radio, you go back a few more decades (not quite applicable to planes, but definitely applicable to boats). If you allow Morse code you go back yet a little further.

This one (bath thermometer) goes to 111°F

Irrational probabilities makes MWI impractical unless you interpret the branching much like a continous graph (as a visualization, see phase of matter graphs) with an ever increasing number of dimensions. And yes continous branching is weird

They’re just contributing to perfect information, or, uh…

And why would a bunch of never-left-their-staters even care in the first place? They clearly don’t want freedom of movement

This map won’t be centered on the equator

EU have a freedom of expression law and multiple countries also have constitutional freedom of speech, including right to film police

Germany is also rather unique in having laws with opaque interpretations

https://digit.site36.net/2023/01/31/police-violence-in-germany-misuse-of-wiretapping-paragraph/

He holds it weird too

In USA, after 3 years of no use and no intent by the owner to use you can challenge a trademark

They went for the protocol used by Bluesky. But apparently disabling federation.

What about surrealists

Interestingly they’re basing it off the Bluesky atproto architecture. Seems like they’re keeping controlled sign-ups and setting the appview to only index (and only display) their own users.

And if they don’t break protocol compatibility, others could have a “read-only view” of their network from servers / clients that federate (comparable to a lemmy server which would reject incoming messages but still let you browse)

That meeting should’ve been an email anyway.

… Uh, wait a minute…

Replying with this in a thread about fighting nazis is pretty tone deaf. Nazis never looted and terrorized anybody according to you…?

Not with those diets

Make Nazis Ballasts