Opportunity cost. Whether we draft a QB only to stick them on the bench in favor of Fields or whether we pick up Fields’s option only to pay him to sit on the bench, we’d be using resources that could have been put toward a player who could provide a much more direct and immediate impact to us. Sure we could trade whoever loses the QB competition, but then every team would know that whoever we’re trading lost the QB competition.
If an established quarterback comes onto the market, that’s absolutely an option we should be considering. That’s just rarely the case, especially not at a reasonable price. The last time we were in the QB market was when Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson were reportedly on the block. Obviously we’re now glad we didn’t get Watson, and Seattle ultimately decided against trading Wilson that offseason at all.
Additionally, none of the people who will be involved in the process of evaluating our QB options this offseason–regardless of who we do or don’t retain–were involved in picking Fields or Trubisky or any other QB this franchise has ever selected unless the McCaskeys get themselves involved. Different OC, different coach, different GM, different team president, different eyes, different processes.