In short, we aren’t on track to an apocalyptic extinction, and the new head is concerned that rhetoric that we are is making people apathetic and paralyzes them from making beneficial actions.

He makes it clear too that this doesn’t mean things are perfectly fine. The world is becoming and will be more dangerous with respect to climate. We’re going to still have serious problems to deal with. The problems just aren’t insurmountable and extinction level.

  • Athena5898@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    oh look people in the comments who are missing the fucking point. I’m honestly so sick of this shit. You either have rainbows and unicorns and “we’ll just figure it out”/climate deniers to “WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH” apathetic fucks who won’t do shit* because “what’s the point we are all doomed anyway” which…causes the same problem as denying does.

    honestly i’ve delt with more people who refuse to change anything because “what’s the point” than I deal with outright deniers anymore.

    *not sure if anyone in the comments is an apathetic "do nothing though tbf and honest. So there is my disclaimer don’t @ me.

    • Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see this all the time on social media, and it’s frustrating. I don’t want to dampen anyone’s passion for combating climate change (because I agree!), but it’s like a feedback loop for rhetoric that gets more and more extreme.

      Something that starts out as:

      “There was a wildfire in _____. This could be part of a larger trend related to climate change.”

      Turns into:

      “This fire was caused directly by climate change.”

      Turns into:

      “The world is on fire! Take shelter!”

      Turns into:

      “Don’t plan for the future. Don’t have children. Move somewhere cold and start prepping for the apocalypse.”

      You can literally watch this same process happen with every issue that gets traction on social media or cable news. Then one side looks at the most extreme comments from the other side and easily dismisses the whole thing.

      • drphungky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I literally had a convo with two friends this weekend about how they won’t have kids because they think it’s irresponsible to raise them in a world “that might not exist when they’re adults”. The doomsaying and hyperbole is absolutely real.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          What worries me about that thinking is that historically children have been the big reason for people to care about the future and what they’ll leave behind.

        • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I personally don’t want kids, and while that may be a bit of hyperbole, kids being born now are going to be living in a vastly different world 35+ years from now. I think people denying the impacts and going “eh, we’ll figure it out” are worse than the doomers.

        • Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t uncommon now, and it’s sad. Social media algorithms pushing doom and gloom for clicks are scaring people out of living their lives.

          The whole thing feels very similar to how Fox News scares old people for viewers, except maybe less intentional.

    • rumckle@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      honestly i’ve delt with more people who refuse to change anything because “what’s the point” than I deal with outright deniers anymore.

      But most of the people who express that opinion aren’t saying it because they think that climate change is unstoppable.

      They are saying it because the changes that we know can help fight climate change, that we’ve known about for years, that international leaders can implement, aren’t being done.

      And this statement, from someone with a lot influence on global carbon emissions than the average person, seems very out of touch. He is telling off the people whose house is burning down, while ignoring the arsonists.

      • Athena5898@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        actually, a lot of them do think climate change is unstoppable in some way shape and form, I know cause i get told that almost every day. There are people doing it in these comments right now.

        Also, I read the article, he is not ignoring the issue here, and honestly, i think this is directed at the leaders too. Who do you think is spreading this gloom and doom in the first place? Who benefits from people giving up and we just live in a worst world when there is much we can do to fight? The fossil fuel-backed “leadership”.

        There are plenty of ways to fight, you just can’t do it alone. No one can fight climate change alone. Our individualism has warped our brains so that we cannot even fathom what to do at first when we ourselves cannot fix a problem by ourselves. Another outcome of hegemony and our corrupt society.

        only through building community and threatening the power structure can we effectively fight for real change. “leadership” (aka people with power who are all corrupt to a certain extent) will do nothing if they do not have a legitimate fear of the people, and that will not come without community building and throwing off the shackles of individualism.