• LordGimp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              You have to realize that semi trucks are built different. Think of it closer to a bulldozer than a pickup. It’s not designed to crumple into origami to absorb the force of impact. It’s a heavy industrial piece of equipment that’s designed to haul assloads of product with 3 or 4 assloads of horsepower. It’d be pointless to subject such vehicles to the same or even similar tests.

              • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You’d still think of verifying energy mitigation/redirection for impact into other vehicles, no?

                Like it should be required that there’s something to keep a car from going under a trailer’s wheels if they merge into the side of a truck. How do you verify that’s working properly?

                • LordGimp@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Nah lmao. Big truck pull hard no stop. As long as it does all those things, fuck everything else

          • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know if heavy trucks are exempt (which may explain why the DOT regulates drivers and their schedules more strictly) but I do know the Cybertruck is not a heavy truck. It’s a light truck which has similar rules to passenger cars.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    I didn’t realize that NHSF crash tests were even optional for mass produced cars.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s mainly to get a nice little graphic to put into your marketing materials. Elon knows that the type of sucker who buys his products doesn’t look past the shiny design.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      What’s the NHSF? You said it like it’s a well known organization or something. lol

      That said, did you think there was a minimum safety rating cars had to achieve or something? That would pretty sweet and something we should totally have. I absolutely love safety regulations!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are lots of safety regulations manufacturers must comply with even if their vehicle is not independently tested.

        I think this aligned with the greater frequency of lawsuits in the US. Sometimes it’s more cost effective to enforce regulations by lawsuit than to hire inspections/audits/testing. I’m not agreeing with them at prioritizing, just describing

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      People love shitting on autonomous driving and I agree that it isn’t ready yet which is why the driver is supposed to still be paying attention, but I think people are way worse and are more likely to cause an accident.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think it varies. A trained human who is paying attention is better than the self driving script (for now?), but sometimes the human driver is drunk, busy texting, or someone whose idea of training was “I’ve ridden in cars before, how hard can it be?”

        It’s not hard to outperform those cases, but “better than Drunkotron” isn’t enough to roll out self driving everywhere.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dude, people with money are so fucking boring.

    Bezos could easily buy 100 of these things (yes I know he can buy an infinite amount) and crash test them himself and put out the stats.

    And he’d make money from it as well

  • yuriy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 months ago

    Who’s excited to see what a vehicle without crumple zones does to a regular car at 60+ mph? Smart money is on at least one person being split completely in half, but the hail mary returns on “no fatalities” is really tempting.

    • GhostTheToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Look, maybe some by crazy chance, it’s super safe for occupants. However, I think the cars it hit will be sheared a good ways through.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        And this is precisely why many people I know want SUVs. Compact cars are simply not safe anymore in much of the United States. I drive a hatchback in Texas and have to pay more attention driving here than anywhere else I’ve lived. The many lifted pickup trucks simply can not see anything other than SUVs, and that ignores the crash testing problems which need to be updated to better reasonable modern roads largely filled with SUVs and pickup trucks.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cars move, meaning its reasonably safer to crash into (or against) another car.

      Its concrete walls and trees that you have to worry about. Those things will murder you. Medians, dividers, buildings, trees, power lines, etc. etc. If you don’t have crumple zones, you’re dead.

    • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why pay a crash test team and fund all of that research when tech bros will test it for you! Good luck everyone else!

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That gif at the beginning of the article clearly showcases the lack of crumple zones. The impact energy doesn’t dissipate and you can see the crash test dummies lurch forward with a good amount of whiplash at 35 mph (56 km/h).

    • dragontamer@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      An internal, unreported test by Tesla. That strangely cuts out before the impact and has no statistics or discussion about it’s crash capabilities.