• GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can NATO just say enough is enough? Attacking food storage will have as large of an effect as the use of a nuclear weapon. The loss in food supply, in theory, would be directly responsible for tens of thousands of starvation related deaths.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all the previous war crimes weren’t enough, one more isn’t going to change anybody’s mind. :(

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NATO can say whatever they want, but they won’t do anything.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      1 nuke is launched, there’s a VERY good chance every single nuke on Earth is launched. Literally everyone dies in that scenario. I agree, attacking the grainaries is evil, but it’s several orders of magnitude less severe than a nuclear bomb. For instance, the 2 nukes dropped on Japan killed almost a quarter million people. Modern nuclear bombs are tens of times more powerful than Fat Man and Little Boy.

    • IchNichtenLichten@server1.duluth.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NATO is a defensive pact, you fuck with one of us, you fuck with all of us. Ukraine isn’t a member but I support it’s application to join.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But the point her is that fucking with the food from Ukraine fucks with the rest.

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            NATO has stated that if nuclear weapons were used outside of NATO territory, they could income article 5 if nuclear fallout enters a territory.

            Not a direct attack in that scenario, just consequences from an attack on a non-nato country, which starvation from a lack of food is also technically a consequence from an attack on a non-nato country.

          • XTornado@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So if I send a Nuke to Ukraine and affects all the border nations we act like oh look they didn’t attack us… Or poison a river that goes to other countries etc…
            Or whatever… So any attack that affect the redt but it’s not direct is nothing… This is stupid