• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe. I’d start with the labelling of everything as “terrorist” first. That’s probably got the most. After that is probably like “authoritarian” or some shit.

    The tactic is pervasive.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, the “thought terminating cliche” is a really old thing. You know the “Our noble government, their perfidious regime” cartoon? It’s exactly that. Hell, Lenin’s snark about “changing the name of things not changing the thing itself” is a part of it. You can probably find ancient Roman authors commenting on this practice if you look.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Right but does it have a name? If it doesn’t have a name, it hasn’t been formalised. Naming it gives you something to attack, it gives you a way to communicate that it’s bad.

        The goal here, in essence, is to use the practice against itself. I want to thought-terminating cliche the tactic of thought-terminating cliches. Give it a name so people can debatebro it as a bad thing that you absolutely should not do every time they see it.