• YMS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, an article with such a headline should be banned from all news-themed communities since 2016 at the very latest, when he proclaimed that autonomous driving is a solved problem.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I recall he claimed fully automated driving would be ready by 2016, and back then I actually believed him.

      When other makers said the technology was at least 5 years away, and probably more like 10, I thought they were losers who couldn’t compete.

      LOL apparently I too was an idiot for believing Musk, My wife and I even bought a house in the country, where driving a car is a must for shopping and daily life in general, in confidence that we soon would have fully autonomous cars.

      1 thing is for sure, when we finally switch to fully electric cars, there is zero chance they will be Tesla, and that’s not because he made 1 mistake.

  • johsny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, he looks so wise in that photo. You would never know that he is actually an idiot irl.

    • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless, he’s saying this stupid shit for more than 10 years now. Self driving cannot be solved without an artificial general intelligence because there has to be an understanding of what other people are going to be doing

      • fearout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh. You can probably solve it with a good enough artificial narrow intelligence. Or/and dedicated infrastructure, inter-car communication protocols, etc. The issue is it’s solving the wrong problem altogether.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Years ago (maybe still) Microsoft had a research facility for self-driving infrastructure. Instead of putting all the recognition and awareness in the car itself, a lot of it was offloaded the mini city they built. Streets and stop signs with embedded RFID, etc.

          This, of course, doesn’t stop pedestrians from dying. But I thought it was a cool approach to the problem to “update the world” instead of trying to make a product that navigates our unmodernized infrastructure

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe, though trams only work in town. I couldn’t go see my family with a tram but I could put my self-driving city car in manual and take it out past the cornfields.

              I think a lot of things have to change outside of major cities for public transportation to really take off as a concept here. There is SO much “empty” space in the US, it’s hard to imagine getting infrastructure out there that mainly only benefits a handful of people

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If there was dedicated lanes/infrastructure it might be possible but makes more sense for cities to improve public transportation. A bus/train is a big fancy car powered by a general intelligence.

  • extant@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t seem far fetched for bots to self-drive Tesla’s since the bots are self-driving Twitter.