• joao@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    10 months ago

    If he means like blaming farmers, who intentionally prevented the publication of research about how eating too much of the food they were producing would most likely kill people by causing diabetes, then yes, he has a point.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Remember when the farming industry did its own independent research on obesity, found they themselves were the cause, and then buried the evidence?

    Remember when the farm industry spilled millions of barrels of crude corn syrup in every ocean?

    Remember when the f

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Taken at face value, I can see the argument here. However, the reality is that the Oil Industry has spent disgusting amounts of money lobbying (bribing) governments and organizations in order to slow or outright kill programs related to clean energy or anything related to weaning off of oil. They are 100% part of the problem. So fuck’em.

  • BaronDoggystyleVonWoof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    Except, the oil industry already knew since like the 80s that burning their stuff will cause climate change.

    And it’s insane that they are still denying it. Truly the worst timeline to be in.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    …like blaming tobacco companies for lung cancer?

    “Hey, you can’t hold us responsible if we deliberately make and market an addictive product. It’s clearly the fault of the people who purchase and use our product exactly as designed and intended.”

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    In the U.S., we can probably blame farm subsidies for some of the obesity. Every politician supports corn subsidies (mostly because they all think they’ll be president someday and the Iowa Caucus is historically the first step to that). The result is that high fructose corn syrup is artificially cheap as an ingredient and industrial-sized food and soda producers use the fuck out of it.

    It’s not so much that corn sugar is worse for you than sugar cane sugar as that “Low fat!” marketed products are often loaded with added sugars (and salt) to make the product more palatable. You can’t expect consumers to sit at the grocery reading over every label.

    And all you need to know about diet recommendations in the U.S. are that they’re done by the Department of Agriculture and not the Department of Health and Human Services. It’s as stupid as asking an oil company executive to help decide how we stop digging up carbon-based molecules and lighting them on fire.

  • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This would be true if you ignored the billions in dollars of subsidies that O&G producers have received.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would say its more like blaming the sugar/corn industry for lobbying for subsidies or getting studies that point the finger at fat over sugar as the problem.