I thought he was ok, maybe even bordering on good. Ironically, he played more like Bagent. Avoiding negative plays (would have liked to see him check out at the line a lot more, some of those run plays were obviously defeated pre-snap and he just let them go anyway), few big passes outside of the one excellent touchdown throw.
But he wasn’t, like, great. Most of the points came because he was getting insane field position.
It’s almost as if multiple things can be bad at the same time.
I don’t believe for one second that there are a significant number of people who want to keep the coaching staff and get rid of Fields.
Honestly asking, do you believe he was bad today? I truly don’t understand how someone could walk away from today with that takeaway
I thought he was ok, maybe even bordering on good. Ironically, he played more like Bagent. Avoiding negative plays (would have liked to see him check out at the line a lot more, some of those run plays were obviously defeated pre-snap and he just let them go anyway), few big passes outside of the one excellent touchdown throw.
But he wasn’t, like, great. Most of the points came because he was getting insane field position.
Because there’s 34 games of evidence to base our opinion on rather than just this one.
Poles wants just that, and he actually matters. So 1 is a significant number in the Bears’ case.