If I say “the sun rises in the morning”, is that also an “implication of status and reasonability”? Do explain how a neutral statement implies “status and reasonability”. Go ahead!
Also explain what an “implication of fashion” is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I’d be surprised if that’s news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.
You also failed to show how I said anything about something being “inherently attractive”. Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.
If you’re going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.
And yet men go for the women with long eyelashes. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work.
But even if they didn’t, imagine this: Women can change the way they look entirely without wanting to look hotter for men. Shocking, I know.
Removed by mod
I don’t believe I made any comment about what’s “inherently attractive” or “reasonable” to “wear on your face”. What’s with the loaded question?
Removed by mod
If I say “the sun rises in the morning”, is that also an “implication of status and reasonability”? Do explain how a neutral statement implies “status and reasonability”. Go ahead!
Also explain what an “implication of fashion” is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I’d be surprised if that’s news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.
You also failed to show how I said anything about something being “inherently attractive”. Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.
If you’re going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.