The people who called us conspiracy theorists and Putin lovers for saying all along that it wasn’t Russia will never apologize or acknowledge their mistake, and they’ll swallow the next obvious lie without a moment’s hesitation.
every time
Kind of weird question maybe, I’m up unreasonably late, but is there a term for the thought process that leads someone to a probably true conclusion (such as the US, Norway, and Ukraine collaborated on the nordstream demolition) due to inference/pattern recognition/intuition, without undeniable evidence?
facts and logic
Really though it’s frustrating that I can’t show the receipts on something so blatantly obvious, I feel like if I encountered someone who really wanted to believe Putler did it, I’d have to resort to fuckin, slapping it into them lol
Most turbo Libs aren’t well meaning people who got duped by some super convincing propaganda. They’re smug, willfully ignorant assholes who subconsciously know half of what they say is total bullshit but they really WANT it to be true. You’re not ever going to convince them cuz they’re not obliged to abide by the truth.
In that case I want to punk them in the eyes of any observers, so the same questions apply imo
No
no I didn’t need to see that right before bed :|
Too most people you sound crazy just explaining how the system works.
Conjecture.
True it’s a form of conjecture but I like the term @Philosoraptor gave, since “abduction” differentiates between conjectures in terms of simplicity and likeliness, so for example “Russia blew up nordstream” and “NATO blew up nordstream” are both conjecture but the latter is a simpler and likelier explanation.
You might call it a kind of abduction (as opposed to induction or deduction), which is inference to the best explanation.
That’s a good one, I’m not sure I’ve heard of that one before but it’s probably the best fit!
Removed by mod
I think its more that they believe they had the best information they could. They’ll see it as a mistake or a blip in their otherwise good research/sources.
The United States did this, full stop. If Ukraine did it then the EU is fully naked and unprotected.
Yeah this is just setting up Ukraine as the fall guy. I still think it was really the US and Norway, like Seymour Hersch said it was: https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Genuinely, if this was Ukraine then the EU coast is completely naked and anyone with a boat can fuck their infrastructure up. You can tell the EU knows this story is bullshit because they’re not doing huge investigations into security. Libs still buy it though.
If the state department told liberals that a unicorn blew up the pipeline, they would believe it
r/cryptids: UNICORNS CONFIRMED (link to state dept press release)
we need a c/cryptids for the juche unicorns!!
I still think it was really the US and Norway
As a Norwegian I agree 100%
It’s the exact sort of shit that the demented old cold-war fossils who run our military would get on board with lol
i showed my lib coworker this and they fr did the “concerning, looking into it” meme like
Weird, I was expecting a “This proves Ukraine attacked a NATO country, time to invade Ukraine” response!
i showed my lib coworker this
how do you have the patience? I gave up on this years ago. it always ends with me “looking crazy”
To stop telling the truth for fear of looking crazy, this is a nineteenth type of liberalism.
fuck, you’re right
Frankly I wish i’d been more public and out of pocket with my predictions these last couple years, because I stood to gain a lot of cred when they all came true.
The only one I’ve been wrong about was “Russia isn’t going to invade Ukraine, y’all need to calm down”
boredom at work, i just whip my phone out and go “bro check this out” and show him
[cognitive dissonance intensifies]
Removed by mod
“It wasn’t us. Also it’s a good thing we did it”
I don’t believe this story. I think it’s a limited hangout to cover up the real details of the destruction by US and Norwegians, reported by Seymour Hersh
They will never admit that it was the US, but just moving away from “Russia bombed its own pipeline” is a big deal
Yeah, the article really spins it to have been one wolf guy.
That narrative never made any sense, anyways. Like, how did even the most credulous westerner explain that to themselves?
Ze evil Ruzzian orcs, incapable of logic due to their inferior brainpan: “ah, yes, I shall bomb my own pipeline to force the effeminate Europeans to buy oil and gas from the US, this is sure to lead me to victory.”
Like, what’s the framing there? That Russia blew up its own pipeline to get people to be mad at Ukraine for cutting off their energy supply somehow? And then the only spin at all was that they just had a single journalist who nobody knows by name and hasn’t been relevant for 20 years post about it on a website nobody’s heard of behind a paywall?
Mark Ames logic: I am very smart, I tell you Putin will never invade Ukraine -> but… Putin invaded Ukraine!! -> Since I am very smart, Putin must be stupid to invade Ukraine -> since Putin is stupid, he is probably stupid enough to blow up his own pipeline
It took Seymour Hersh to get on RWN for him to shut up about this completely stupid argument of his.
Ze evil Ruzzian orcs, incapable of logic due to their inferior brainpan: “ah, yes, I shall bomb my own pipeline to force the effeminate Europeans to buy oil and gas from the US, this is sure to lead me to victory.”
I can hear Yugopnik doing his ‘ze evil Russian orc’ voice in this whole sentence.
Maybe it’s that Putler decided to teach Germany/the EU a lesson by blowing up their own … Idk . It’s so dumb to even think about, I can feel my braincells dying in real time. NATO so obviously did it, I can hardly imagine the level of delusional propaganda brain needed to believe otherwise.
I believe the story was supposed to be that it was a false flag by Russia, done to frame the US and make the EU states angry enough to not help the US/Ukraine.
I don’t buy it. 6 schmucks just rent a sailboat and some deep sea diving equipment? It’s a scapegoat. The only country both capable and incentivized to pull it off is the US. US officials and Biden have said many times they would destroy it. They just can’t be seen as responsible for directly attacking Russia and Europe.
It’s ridiculous on its face
yep
The current US Secretary of State literally wrote a book about blowing up Russian gas pipelines. There was always only one suspect here.
Also wouldn’t be the first time the US blew up a Russian undersea pipeline. Has been happening since the Soviet era and at this point is a tradition.
This is diversionary propaganda in my opinion. The goal is to hand over blame of the attack to Ukraine so it doesn’t harm the US in diplomacy with Europe and Germany going forwards.
Oh and we’re supposed to believe that Ukraine can pull this off but not be able to get the Crimean Bridge?
Convenient this out a week after the article saying that the USA gave the its time to surrender talk to Ukraine
Could you send some sources for the claim that the USA are telling Ukraine it needs to consider surrendering?
Okay yeh I seen this.
I think this is just referring to negotiations for a ceasefire or end to the conflict but not a full surrender of the Ukrainian government no?
It’s also difficult for me to gauge how serious these reports are. They could be psy-op work by other side. Perhaps to convince people that the yanks are down to negotiate and then blame Russia when it inevitably does not materialize. I could be wrong, but it seems to me like neither side has any real incentive to negotiate for the time being. The US and Ukraine may be hoping that Russia also bleeds themself enough from attrition on the front lines that they are eventually content with just the Donbass and Crimea. I’d be very interested to see whether or under what conditions Russia would actually come to the table. What incentive do they have now? If the US gets to the point where the situation for Ukraine is so dire that they are willing to get negotiations going and push Ukraine to accept giving these territories, then why would Russia in that situation not simply also have no incentive to negotiate? Why not push up to Kiev? I guess the main obstacle there and possible source of WW3 style crisis would be if there is a nuclear standoff as Russia pushes all the way through Ukraine and the US starts setting nuclear-use related red lines.
Exactly, they angling the move of saying: “it was a rogue agent of Ukraine”. Which is smart in that it is obviously more believable than the narrative of “Russian bombed their own pipeline and a key point of leverage in negotiations with Europe”.
But yeh it is still very funny as a narrative.
Didn’t Biden slip up and kinda admit it at one point?
Don’t have the video link with me, but 3 weeks before Russia invaded, Biden said “if Russia invades, then we will put an end to Nord Stream”, a reporter then asked “how exactly?” and he said “I assure you we’ll be able to do it.”
Here you go: https://youtu.be/OS4O8rGRLf8
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Yes he threatened it before it happened
He did, before they bombed the pipeline even.
Even this would be an act of war against most of Europe
European vassals know better than to question the infinite wisdom of their American masters
Removed by mod
Sir, I need you to upload a high resolution image of your hog to verify your account.
Clear bullshit, right?
If Ukraine could pull this off, I could pull this off. I refuse to believe that international infrastructure could be so vulnerable.
deleted by creator
I mean to be fair if you can afford to be a WH40k fan you probably have the resources of a mid-sized Eastern European country.
a six-person team that rented a sailboat under false identities and used deep-sea diving equipment to place explosive charges on the gas pipelines
I doubt I could do it without getting caught, but the fact that I could cripple Europe’s economy with a sailboat and a few explosives is terrifying.
Even that story is bullshit, because the boat they tracked as being the rented one is relatively small, and they’d brought on several thousand pounds worth of explosives.
Are you an expert deep sea diver?
That’s something a person could viably become. I think the point is that there was a lack of institutional power or actual military equipment or anything else beyond the reach of an individual being used here.
“But thousands of pounds of explosives”
Yeah, that’s probably the hardest part, but it’s not like any of it was particularly artisanal.
I wouldn’t be caught dead using non-artisanal explosives
Bespoke bombs
Whose economy is crippled lol
The HCOB Eurozone Manufacturing PMI came in at 43.1 in October 2023, down from 43.4 in September and compared with a preliminary estimate of 43. This marked the sixteenth consecutive month that the Eurozone’s manufacturing sector has been in contraction territory, and the sharpest in three months
China’s, their economy is gonna collapse within the next decade you CCP shill
You’re reading Andreas Malm, they’re living it!
Won’t know until in a few decades it all gets declassified but my bet was always a US Navy Special Warfare team, aka SEAL team. That is who the US uses for such operations. Previous week there had been US Navy units doing exercises in the general area. The level of hostility, type of aggressive narrative control, and how key US outlets were already standing ready to suppress certain details made it suspicious from the start.
The US uses the same playbook again and again, makes people suspicious even when the US might not have been involved in events.
I mean it’s still a state. Lot easier to forge all kinds of documents and get stuff if you’rea already a state.
Sure, but that only matters if you want to avoid getting caught afterwards.
If you can talk the US into turning a blind eye you can pull off a lot
i think we’re capable of more than we think
The amount of explosives and specialist diving equipment required to do this is actually not trivial.
The idea half a dozen dudes did this in a small yacht is laughable.
The nato ships doing “exercises” to “train” for exactly this type of operation that were in the exact area about 2 weeks beforehand is the immensely more plausible explanation, which points to the UK and USA, probably with the cooperation of Denmark since it was just near to their waters and observation area.
read theory!
what is this?
Are you some kind of hypnotist?
is there a more cucked country in the world than Germany?
The UK. Cucked to both unwavering Atlanticism towards the USA, and a monarchy. Left the EU for the stupidest of all possible reasons. Sent Boris Johnson to sabotage peace deals in Ukraine. Terf island. It just goes on and on.
Meanwhile Australia is buying $400 billion ‘worth’ of nuclear submarines while the Prime Minister is going to China to try and sell lobsters at a market stall or something
https://twitter.com/qingqingparis/status/1721097724509229254
(About half the leaders of Australian states have also visited China in the last month, probably because the US is too busy with Ukraine and Israel to scold Australia too hard)
mods are asleep, establish diplomatic ties with china
The UK is definitely the answer. And worse, people are totally, willfully blind to it.
I remember pointing out where most of the money was coming from for leaving rhe EU (it wasn’t Russia, it was American libertarian think tanks, software companies, and healthcare companies) as well as the money that was spent against Corbyn on things like the ‘Integrity Initiative’ smear abd disinfo campaigns (US gov, UK gov, Facebook, US & UK arms manufacturers, Saudi gov) and people still said 'I don’t know about that, why would America care? The papers say it was Russia before the very same people complain about how American our media has gotten.
People complain about the culture war shit and how it feels like an American import, but if you point out that right wing American think tanks and orgs (from TPUSA to evangelical anti-trans orgs) are funnelling a shit loaf of money here you get blank stares and muttering about how it’s probably because we’re so similar to the US.
Our prime minister is a de facto billionaire who has US citizenship and didn’t even live here a lot of the time before becoming PM. Keir Starmer, after being a loyal dog of the British security state for years, regularly met with intelligence chiefs in the US long before he was head of the Labour Party. MPs as a whole I’ve met tend to love the US and have ideas about moving there ‘one day’ and the smarter/wealthier ones have stock portfolios full of US healthcare companies etc that are lined up to further privatise the NHS. I knew MPs who took paid trips to the US to form working groups with what would have been the Hilary admin before and after 2016 to study, I shit you not, electability, which of course meant building a Democrat-like party whose job it is to completely kill off the left, not to mention all those nice US lobbyists they got to meet.
But again, if you point that out, people look at you like it’s some far out conspiracy theory. The very same people who today complain about America lying and dragging us into the Iraq War are the same people who argue that America doesn’t have any control over our foreign policy today.
don’t think Rishi Sunak has US citizenship but there is this green card/permanent residency scandal:
You’re right, it was permanent residency. I misremembered, probably in part because the yank immigration system makes even less sense to me than the British one did when I was trying to navigate it with refugee orgs. Thanks for the correction.
didn’t mean to take away from your (GOOD) post at all it’s on point
No worries, I didn’t take it like that.
I think the fact that the UK spawned the US makes the cucking even more embarrassing. This is your child, you made this, and now you just follow every whim
Tbf with the UK, they were only strong because of their empire. The moment they lost that, they pretty much became a backwater European country.
This is the liberal playbook though. They did this with the Iraqi “wmds” and every CIA coup ever.
