footfaults [none/use name]

  • 19 Posts
  • 799 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2020

help-circle












  • @2:03 Wu: I got into the progressive movement over a decade ago

    Jesus christ. This pisses me off because this person has done nothing but shit all over everything and hasn’t even been in this movement for very long. Like, I think I am only a little younger than Wu and I have been kicking around since 2004.

    Like, I’m not trying to gatekeep here. It’s just that this person smells like a grifter to me.

    @2:27

    Charges of the left being anti-semetic, man fuck off.

    5:00 Konst talking about bots

    5:30 Konst is mad about people calling her NATO

    6:15 Wu jumps in and agrees that Konst was treated unfairly by people online.

    Ugh. Kill me

    7:40

    okay finally De La Cruz gets a chance to talk and finally talks some sense about how the Democratic party is the one who silences leftists and progressives. Excellent stuff.

    12:17 Wu basically accuses the anti-zionist stances as being a smokescreen, or a way to hide their anti-semitism

    honestly I think I’m just going to skip the parts where Konst or Wu talk and just focus on De La Cruz



  • So, I’m willing to step on this landmine here.

    If you were a US soldier in Vietnam, you absolutely were fighting for a nation that did war crimes in Vietnam and was the bad guy.

    But I feel like the war criminal label has to actually be reserved for the people that actually did the killing of civilians, and specific acts, like the solders that did the Mai Lai massacre.

    Like if you harmed civilians, yeah war criminal.

    But if somehow you managed to fight just armed combatants (bear with me here), even if you were fighting for a colonial aggressor (France or the US in Vietnam) that doesn’t rise to the level of war crime. That’s just you being part of an imperialist aggressor (which is STILL BAD) and for some reason it just feels like calling every US soldier a war criminal just dilutes the label and makes the idea of war crimes less serious and prosecuting those people who did them less likely to happen.

    Like, to put it another way: every war crime is immoral, reprehensible, and evil, but not every immoral, reprehensible and evil thing rises to the level of a war crime?