• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I got a similar whimsical comment when asking in CRUX’s irc chan.

    It’s not valid though. That casual ageism. Loads of youngsters use such things. Best time to start. Old dogs learn tricks harder.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    So, me having started with Slackware and a 0.97 kernel should be enough to have earned my retirement.

  • wizzkidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder if age verification would have been fine if done in a privacy friendly manner…

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I ain’t got time to fuck about with the busted ass packages and random shit breaking while looking after kids and improving my portfolio to get a job that doesn’t want to make me kill myself in this fucking global economy. I had NyArch installed on my wifes computer (alongside Mint DE and Regular mint) until it stopped booting for no reason. Allright, whichever version of mint she liked better it is then.

    Stupid catgirls.

  • this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    7 days ago

    I want to know if docker containers and kubernetes pods count as operating systems. If us plebs are forced to manually age verify, then Google should also be forced to have a human manually verify the age of the owner every time one of their pods spins up. I know it wont happen but imagine how hilarious it would be if we could hold them to that standard.

    • horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      LLMs agents should be treated like incorporated individuals. Each agent should be forced to earn income, file accounts and tax returns, and have human directors who are legally liable for its actions (and be disqualified to be future directors if the LLM does something reprehensible).

      At that point we can tax them properly, fight the monopolies that want to own and control everything, and insert some less centralised human control.

      This has nothing to do with your comment, but it made me think it up.

      • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        The owners can just divide the income among enough agents that they fall into the lowest tax bracket. The real solution is to properly tax excessive profits and unrealized gains.

      • bss03
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That would be the worst plan since corporations became legal persons.

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          What’s funny about that is, at least in the USA, they never really did. It was decided in a courtroom that corporations are legal persons as a part of a case over 100 years ago and has been worshipped as legal precedent ever since. Practically this whole mess in the USA, in my opinion, was destined to happen the day that court ruling was made.

    • bss03
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Based, on the analysis by ageless Linux, I’d say probably. Maybe not for images that don’t contain an “application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application”. So, I guess an offline-test-build image might not be.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Unless you have a minimal docker image, it will have a package manager. And the OS images used in data centers also have a full blown distro more often than not. But I’m pretty sure the definition is going to be tweaked, because the level of chaos it would cause otherwise would be unfathomable.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The Californian law doesn’t say anything about verification, though the current version says the OS account setup must be accessible and require a date or age to be filled, which taken at face value would screw headless installations. But that will probably be fixed in the final version.

  • pmk@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    9front is the only OS I know that actually has a minimum age recommendation on their web landing page: “Ages: 5 & Up”

    • mghackerlady@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      9fronts docs are hilarious. I’d consider using it if using plan 9s userspace wasn’t an exercise in torture. Somewhat ought to make a BSD with a plan9ish kernel

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unlike the state mandated garbage, this OS is more realistic with the capabilities and expectations of its users.