Republicans rejected a resolution to curb Trump’s ability to unilaterally take military action, even as questions linger about the scope and goals of the escalating conflict.

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked a resolution to curb Donald Trump’s military authority in Iran, sending a clear message to the country and world: GOP lawmakers are — at least for the moment — unwilling to put a check on the president’s operation in the Middle East, and there’s little Democrats can do about it right now.

The 47-53 vote fell mainly along party lines, with Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky — the GOP co-sponsor of the effort — the only Republican to join all but one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, in support of the motion.

The measure would direct the removal of U.S. forces from Iran that haven’t been authorized by Congress, pointing to Article I of the Constitution, which gives Congress sole power to declare war.

As the vote was underway, Paul lamented a Congress “without ambition.”

  • DandomRude@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, that should finally make it clear that the US is a failed state where organized crime reigns instead of law and order. This has been more than obvious for a long time, but perhaps now even those who still refused to believe it will finally realize that they are ruled by a king-like mob boss whose depravity can hardly be surpassed by any other monstrous tyrant of this world.

  • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man, just imagine the amount of rampant blackmailing/kompromat that must be held on these Republicans…

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the point of Congress anymore? Just pass asinine laws that only serve to irritate people then go on vacation? Because they aren’t doing much more than that.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Without ambition?” Senator Paul really needs to turn down that spicy rhetoric before he sets the senate on fire with his words. What a brutal takedown.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t forget the stare of disappointment Schumer surely gave everyone over his glasses. I’m sure that’ll show 'em all.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, he (trump) started talking about it saying people are going to say he can’t pay attention long enough and will get bored. Then, and you can’t make this shit up, immediately started talking about the gold drapes in the room and his new ballroom.