Sooooo. Who’s actually going to arrest him? And then charge him?
Every single one of those people are common murderers and thugs. They should be thrown in prison and left to rot.
thats the problem they are not common murderers and thugs, they are billionaires, CEOs, multination conglomerates that run the world.
They behave and talk exactly like common murderers and thugs. I watched a fuckload of interrogation videos and the only difference between the fuckers who kill random people for fun and these people is their bank accounts and having an entire media apparatus behind you.
If Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold came back to life and had fox news behind them, if they decided to shoot up columbine a 2nd time many would be convinced it was necessary to fight the woke and nip woke activities and transgender professors in the bud.
Every time we hear something outrageous about these psychopaths, it always sounds too insane, even for them. Then we find out it is true, and even worse than we thought.
So this? Sure, why not? I’ve come to believe these pigs are capable of literally anything. I wouldn’t be surprised if they ate a baby.
And now we’ve become the same as r/conservative. Just believe anything because to aligns with your world view.
Are you claiming that the files released by the Department of Justice are fabricated?
We know that he is accused of having been complicit and a witness to infanticide, which is perhaps easy shadenfreude to believe but accusations are not proof of wrongdoing. Sadly, if it is true, we need a lot more than a record of conversation with a victim about events occurring 40 years ago.
I’m saying we can’t know why the fuck is real in them. They’ve had them so long that they could have been doctored in god knows how many ways.
Do I believe they out here killing babies? Not without proof no.
No, we aren’t the same at all. PedoCons literally invent their lies about their opponents out of thin air (the “Biden Crime Family,” etc.), while we are only choosing to believe actual evidence from the biggest international pedophile ring in history, and not accept their lame excuses for their despicably evil behavior.
If you can’t see the difference, then YOU are part of the problem. Polish your Critical Thinking Skills.
I hate that this particular story is being picked up. it’s a single report to the FBI from someone decades after it allegedly happened. Literally the best possible example of hearsay
The Epstein docs have so much far more damning evidence that is verifiable. Focusing on what amounts to a single phone call to the FBI - something I could do myself tomorrow - makes us look like bafoons
It’s like… It’s going just as planned.
So maybe it’s our turn to Flood The Zone™. Keep them on rhe defense, tire them out, and wait for them to make a mistake. A few weeks of this and I’d wager he’s just ducking stupid enough to admit to the shit he did, just to disprove the shit he didn’t do.
Basically you call anyone a pedo publically and that sticks in everyones heads. It doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong, they’ll think it. It’s why the conservatives make hella random ass wide spread bs accusations since it does eventually get ingrained in ppls head so they subconcioisly get turned away from those candidates.
I reckon that if you questioned him in the white house press room and called him a gay pedophile because he had sex with little boys (which would also make him a DEI hire), he would balk so hard at that that he’d let something spill live on camera.
But you’d have to stand and keep eye contact with him such that you looked like you were about to cross the room and kick his head in, because at heart, he is a coward.
Hearsay is when someone says they heard that x happened, but didn’t see it personally. This is eyewitness testimony, as in the person making the allegation says they saw it happen. For it to be hearsay she would have needed to disclose it to another person who then disclosed it to the FBI.
This is a second hand report of the first person’s claim. The document itself is hearsay. Her testimony would be admissable. A recording would be admissable. A typewritten document from who the fuck knows when is not.
A typewritten document from who the fuck knows when is not.
The fact it’s not a recording doesn’t make it not firsthand testimony, and neither does its age (which is from 2020 btw, you can see it yourself at the top of the document).
Firsthand testimony isn’t inherently true, but that doesn’t make it not firsthand testimony.
It sure as shit isn’t hearsay as was being asserted.
but it’s not first-hand testimony. it’s a typewritten document by an FBI agent. that is literally not first-hand testimony. in order to be first-hand testimony it needs to be given in a courtroom or recorded. we don’t even know if the person who made the phone call is who they claim to be.
They are intentionally picking at this for that reason. Easy to dismiss, so the rest they can just say is the same quality
No, you misunderstand. His fanboys will never change. The question is whether the FBI and DOJ have actually investigated anything. And this is an example where they didn’t. That’s more felonies for lying to Congress, that’s more dark shit to look into.
Remember, we aren’t a court. We don’t need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We are the people demanding transparency and oversight. Justice? Fuck, he would die before any trial took place, at this point, he’s just too old and too sick.
You don’t even have any evidence to suggest they didn’t investigate the claim. Do you have any idea how many lunatics file false claims every day? Overwhelming is with time-wasting bullshit sure sounds like a great way to stall for time. I’m not interested in helping mask the real stuff but looking at one-off unsubstantiated reports that any citizen could make.
Show me a single shred of evidence supporting this claim and I’ll be with you. But at this point it’s a giant fucking waste of time and energy.
The same could be said about the Epstein files themselves. There are so many clearer instances of Trump breaking the law, his oath, and the constitution without having to back to something that came out during his previous term and devolved to nothing. To me, it’s funny how people point to real world threats and problems Trump is threatening, preparing, and has already caused and saying that that’s a distraction from Epstein and not the other way around.
Propagandist don’t just feed their own narratives, they feed the easiest takes to deal with from their opposition so that their loudness drowns out the most effective opposition. With Trump, evidence seems to point that Epstein is definitely bothering him but it is not really stopping him from doing any of the BS he’s doing. The point isn’t that it doesn’t bother him, but that he keeps the focus on the small things that bother him so that people ignore the big things that would.
As much as I hate trump, and would love this to be true, it’s well in the catagory of “uh he h, sure”
I can believe he would SA women and girls, but this is two steps further, and is a very uncomfortable report.
Shit like this is plenty bad
Wrong font , fake ?
No, I grabbed this directly off the .gov website.
Bone spur coward!
This is not something to focus on I’m going to need much more evidence and information before taking a claim like this seriously but this is all over with people treating it like a established fact which makes anti-trumpers look silly.
Provided that: Trump is allowed to, without ever disclosing any evidence, presume people to be immigrants, and then to also presume them to be illegal, until proven innocent, sending them to prison camps in the meantime, often without ever giving them any effective trial at any point; then I can likewise presume him guilty of these crimes until and unless he’s proven innocent too.
The difference is my presumption of guilt does not (and will not) result in him getting sent to a prison camp (unfortunately). Maybe you still think that is a realistic option if we just make sure to focus on the “right” evidence to eventually convict King Trump who hasn’t already found half a dozen ways to prematurely pardon himself of all possible wrongdoing. I don’t.
So you’re simply not going to stop me from presuming him guilty. Go ahead and call me or anyone who is willing to believe this a “silly” “anti-trumper” if you want. It will just make you look like a disingenuous moron.
This is not a logical, rational debate between opposing and equally valid positions that will be resolved fairly by following a specific process. This is an ideological war against inhumanity and injustice, and all is fair in love and war. Trump is inhumane, Trump is unjust, and Trump is guilty, and I don’t need any more evidence for any of that than the present reality has already provided. I am not a judge and this is not a trial, this is my personal opinion, and I will not relinquish my entitlement to it, thankyouverymuch.
