President Joe Biden said on Monday the threat of Russian President Vladimir Putin using tactical nuclear weapons is “real”, days after denouncing Russia’s deployment of such weapons in Belarus. On Saturday, Biden called Putin’s announcement that Russia had deployed its first tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus “absolutely irresponsible”.

  • ArtemZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And what the entire west is going to do about it? Express deep concerns? Deliver 10 more outdated tanks to Ukraine?

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deliver 10 more outdated tanks to Ukraine?

      Russia is fielding T-55 tanks onto battlefields in Ukraine. If that sets the baseline, then nothing the west has sent can be considered “outdated”.

      • ArtemZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally irrelevant because:

        • Russians use them mostly as tactical utility vehicles for moving personel around.
        • Tank battles almost never happens in modern warfare
        • Russians still have more T90s than Ukraine has Leopards and T90 is a more advanced and better protected machine
          • ArtemZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are they really losing? Looking at the map it seems like they control 2x territory compared to pre-2022. And they just recently took Bakhmut.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Russians use them mostly as tactical utility vehicles for moving personel around.

          Tanks aren’t made to transport people and they are abysmally bad at it. They use a ton of fuel and don’t hold anybody but the crew. A passenger could sit on top, but if you are going the 100% unprotected route, there are piles of vehicles out there that are less maintenance and fuel intensive for troop transport. If that is honestly how Russia is using their T-55s, I encourage them to continue.

          • ArtemZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are using a tank purely for moving people around then the only crew member is tank commander. Speaking of fuel, it is not like Russia has any shortage of it.