• Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re being a dolt. They’re there because of their quasi sovereign pre invasion nationality, you see it as color they see it as an attachment to the land.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, that’s why I say it can still be morally correct to create this position in parliament. Quite frankly I think they should get more than just this one position. It boggles the mind how land can just be taken and the native population just ignores like this for centuries.

      But if it’s based on race it’s racist. That’s a fact. Unless you redefine racist to be only against minorities. Or only against non-white people. But for me racism is action based on the race of people.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed.

        Nope. Not even by the definition of racism. It’s equity, equitable things can be based on protected classes, sure.