• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about this specific case but it’s a common practice to have big consumers be on specific agreements with national grid so they can be shut off on demand to ensure the grid integrity. The companies are compensated for the inconvenience in exchange for their flexibility. Usually it’s with heavy industries like metal, paper and glass manufacturers.

    • MechanicalJester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Architected a bunch of software to measure baselines, prove or disprove responses to demands within requested periods etc.

      You don’t want giant arc furnaces running full tilt in the midst of an energy crunch. It’s enough compensation to cover NOT producing anything that day which the ratepayers pay for but also benefit from.

      Everything had to work sub-second round-trip, fun stuff, egomaniacal boss.