Mexico’s supreme court has decriminalized abortion across the country, two years after ruling that abortion was not a crime in one northern state.

That earlier ruling had set off a grinding process of decriminalizing abortion state by state. Last week, the central state of Aguascalientes became the 12th state to decriminalize the procedure. Judges in states that still criminalize abortion will have to take account of the top court’s ruling.

The supreme court wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that it had decided that “the legal system that criminalized abortion in the Federal Penal Code is unconstitutional, [because] it violates the human rights of women and people with the ability to gestate.”

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because not letting the state choose means the federal government is telling the state what to do and that’s big government overreach

    • Bloodyhog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a world outside the US, as they say… Regardless, why would a federal government enforce the control of someone’s body? There are in general 2 people involved in this, and they should be the only ones responsible for this type of decisions. Not a state, not feds.

        • Bloodyhog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If we are talking about 2 consenting adults - yep, this is my take on it, only these 2 are in charge, until the baby is born. Afterwards there must be some protection for the baby, so there is a role for a government. It was not always like that, but that is how, I think, it should be at this stage of society’s evolution. Another moral claim, I know. )

    • gtaman@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But … states have different partial authonomy. Again, PARTIAL. Otherwise, they arent really part of federal government in the first place.

      By ur logic texas can say “well, now we wont have a president but we will have a ruling dynasty.” For me even the authonomy american states actually have is too high. Like how can in a same country have different laws about BASIC human rights?