• DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Varrick bombed buildings and tried to kidnap a president to start a war for profit and got away with it too.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No he “got away” with decades of war crimes by becoming disillusioned of the society he was born and bred in and becoming a political enemy of the state and putting his physical wellbeing at risk to free the people his country had waged war on all while mentoring the person who would take over that country and try to create a better country and a better world. One of the most poignant moments is when he says he didn’t realize his visions of conquering ba sing se would be him taking it back for its own people.

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Which is why this is fictional, and he’s allowed to have a narrative story arc.

      However, if this was a Nazi SS Officer, who fled to South America, and then went on to redeem himself by [insert narratively compelling redemption story], he’d still be a war criminal.

      But again, it’s a cartoon, and we don’t have to treat his character as if he were an actual Imperial General commanding troops during wars of conquest, especially one from the IJA.

  • dotslashme
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 hours ago

    People change, we should all learn to see people for who they are, not who they were.

  • Dadifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m not sure siege is considered a war crime. Isn’t that just standard medieval warfare?

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean really the existence of war crimes relies on the existence of treaties between the nations defining what those crimes are. Gonna guess the Fire Nation was not a signatory.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The other nations wouldn’t see it that way.

      There’s no central authority, but it’s not a machiavellian free-for-all like medeival Europe. The rest of the world was rather unhappy with the Fire Nation’s aggression, even in light if the world’s long history of warfare. He would be tried for that, no doubt.

      And his reputation/nickname is subtext for crimes he did commit but that the cartoon couldn’t spell out.

    • TOModera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, it’s not a war crime that I can find, however we can attribute harm caused to civilians through these actions, such as starvation due to supply lines cut off. So he did some vile shit, had a moment where he realized the error in his ways, then did everything in his power to make things better.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A war crime according to… Who? Is there some treaty or convention that happened? Is there some customary international law that he violated? I can’t find the Hague anywhere on any maps in this universe but maybe I missed something.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well he does leave the army and help the opposition so I’d say he redeemed himself hard

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like how NATLA goes into his “war crimes” more.

    And Lu Ten’s funeral… I cried over that scene.

    There’s a lot to not like about live-action atla, but I was there for all the Iroh/Zuko scenes. Kinda like Book 1 of ATLA, to be honest.