• GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, I think their reading of Lenin is correct but they are just applying it carelessly. This is why I always say “liberalism” to describe the political system is more useful.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s not so bad. I just think that Lenin was in the wrong using the phrase to begin with, and that we seem to all acknowledge it’s a shit phrase by not using it, and instead using “socialism” or “AES” to describe states doing this.

      In my experience people that want to adhere to Lenin’s term are usually doing so because they want to imply that these states aren’t socialism and that they are just capitalism. This is where we can easily get into conflicts.

      • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To clarify, I was not trying to do this. I was, and do, talk about it as a socialist strategy. I don’t call it socialism alone, because that erases other, non-statist forms of socialism such as cooperativism, syndicalism, or parecon. We might call this “state socialism”, but I have found that term to be less understood than “state capitalsm”