Social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against conspiracy theories ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

  • Billiam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7410 months ago

    That’s a lot of words to just say “Allowing bad actors to lie about elections makes us money, while hiring the staff to combat election lies costs us money, and we’re too sociopathic to spend money for the good of the country.”

      • @astreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        I have had a sociological theory for a while now:

        There has been two dominate breeds of homo sapiens: the people and the dragons.

        The dragons, through out history, have been driven by greed, whether it’s capturing more land, hoarding gold, or accumulating power.

        The people have been driven by cooperation and community, whether it’s sharing a cup of sugar, or giving money to those in need, or building a barn as a community.

        The problem we’ve faced with Capitalist Realism is the argument that deep down we are all dragons whether we want to admit it or not, when actually dragons are a tiny, tiny tiny percent of the population determined to benefit at the expense of everyone else.

  • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is a shitty opinion article that links speculation, anecdotal evidence, and “experts” with no actual studies at all. Whether or not they’re doing a good job at it, all of these companies invest heavily in moderation on their platforms, and that investment hasn’t been reduced substantially.

    Everyone hates social media through elections, it’s an easy thing to blame because the loud get louder. This article is punching down early for clicks.

    • Prethoryn Overmind
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      I made a comment the other day saying Lemmy users are just as biased as average people.

      Someone said, “how is this article biased.”

      I am convinced half the user base that was here before Reddit doesn’t know they are stuck in a loop of reading and posting articles here that justify their mindset the same as anyone else.

        • @PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          Lemmy caters particularly well to the doomer crowd, since it presents an alternative to corporate-owned social media. Doomers have a lot of overlap with leftists(or liberals or whatever), and this causes a feedback loop of depression and anxiety. Consider two people; the leftist and the doomer:

          -The leftist gets mad about something and posts a few articles

          -The doomer sees this and reposts it with a more fatalistic title

          -The leftist sees the new post and becomes more outraged, posting massive walls of enraged text in the comments

          -The doomer reads the first paragraph and begins wailing about how the world is ending

          -This anger spills over into other posts and generally sours the mood for everyone involved

          Because the doomer is incapable of viewing anything in a positive light and the leftist lives in a state of perpetual butthurt, they feed into one another and fill everybody’s feed with outrage and despair.

          Swap the leftist with alt-right and you have 4chan circa 2017. Let it fester for a few years and you have a machine for churning out political extremists.

    • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -510 months ago

      Yes, and stay on Lemmy, the totally unmoderated version of those filled with Russian and CCP propaganda.

          • KSP Atlas
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Yeah there were systematic issues at play there

        • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          If you’re going to compare it to corporations like Meta who spend billions per year on platform moderation then yes, it’s absolutely unmoderated. Even compared to the shitty volunteer moderation of Reddit, which at least has mod tools. If Lemmy was big enough to be noticed by the media it’d be right up there on that list of misinformation spreaders, because that’s just what social media is.

          I like Lemmy better than those platforms, I’m here after all, but saying get off those other platforms from a platform that has the same problems is the pot calling the kettle black

  • @RobotToaster
    link
    English
    22
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Maybe a hot take, but allowing capitalist corporations to decide what is “the truth” was always a terrible idea.

    • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      What?

      Musk might be the number 1 person in the whole world when it comes to losing money this past year.

      • @CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Oh, I’m hardcore anti musk, but I mean “firing watchdog staff to reduce overhead”, not that musk is financially literate.

        If musk can fire his watchdog staff, thereby reducing staffing costs, other companies will want to follow suit. Just look at Spez admiring musk.

      • Prethoryn Overmind
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -110 months ago

        They are just another Lemmy user that doesn’t know what the fuck they are talking about.

  • @Jeredin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    Facebook was the start (though Yahoo and YouTube weren’t far behind). All conservatives and the rich have is money, so what’s it to them to buy out the company or their CEO? This may end up being a worse propaganda machine than FOX, but time will tell…Haven’t been on Reddit but not sure how their algorithm has been doing but their ads were very conservative before I left…

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      Facebook Hired Joel fucking Kaplan right after he left the Bush White House. Kaplan personally exempted rightwing conspiracy news sites from Facebook’s truth standards, while also deprioritizing more overtly left leaning sites.

      He personally nixed any change to the Facebook algorithm that would reduce the radicalization pipeline.

      Oh, and he also stuffed Facebook management with right-wing yes men.

      • @boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        Thank you. At least someone remembers that Facebook/Meta has been a right winger echo chamber earlier than Musk’s version

      • @Jeredin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Best we can do is migrate…I always had this thought (stick with it): a lot of police are conservative, because how many progressive people do you know who want to have that difficult job? It seems true for management to: progressives don’t enjoy bossing people around and often enjoy the process of producing/making something. So who is left to fill the void? Conservatives. Worse, it doesn’t seem rare that “progressives,” turn hyper capitalist or all together conservative - they simply joins the rich club and most of their ideology. Even most politically left politicians only pander to progressive social issues but tend to bend to special interests. It’s going to take a major shift to change our power structure and who knows how that will come about…

  • The Snark Urge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    They know our government effectively has schizophrenia. Trouble is they’re fucked in the long run whether it’s Jekyll or Hyde.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation, abandoning their most aggressive efforts to police online falsehoods in a trend expected to profoundly affect the 2024 presidential election.

    These shifts are a reaction from social media executives to being battered by contentious battles over content and concluding there is “no winning,” said Katie Harbath, former director of public policy at Facebook, where she managed the global elections strategy across the company.

    In the run-up to the 2020 presidential election, social media companies ramped-up investigative teams to quash foreign influence campaigns and paid thousands of content moderators to debunk viral conspiracies.

    Civil rights groups pressured the platforms — including in meetings with Zuckerberg and Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg — to bolster their election policies, arguing the pandemic and popularity of mail-in ballots created an opening for bad actors to confuse voters about the electoral process.

    Internal momentum to impose the new rule seemed to plummet after Musk boasted of his plans to turn Twitter into a safe haven for “free speech” — a principle Zuckerberg and some board members had always lauded, one of the people said.

    Instagram head Adam Mosseri, who led efforts to build Threads, said earlier this year that the platform would not actively “encourage” politics and “hard news,” because the extra user engagement is not worth the scrutiny.


    The original article contains 2,614 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 91%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @Monomate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    Moral of the story: it only took one social media site to start being more lax on cersorship for the other ones to follow suit. Maybe this is indicative that spending a lot of money on censorship measures is useless.

  • @deft@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    tbh if you aren’t in highschool or a content creator why the fuck have an insta or Facebook or any of this at this point. nobody cares about your vacation bro